10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. Epistemonikon is a special feature <strong>of</strong> rationality, fitting us uniquely for, among other things, the rule <strong>of</strong>law itself. After all, what is the rule <strong>of</strong> law except the ability to apply some universal precept to anindefinitely large number <strong>of</strong> individual instances, each qualifying as, for example, “theft”?2. It is in virtue <strong>of</strong> this rationality that we become fit for a mode <strong>of</strong> political, social, and civic life that isunavailable to other “types” within the kingdom <strong>of</strong> life.II. Given that we have these faculties and powers, how will Aristotle understand and approach the problem <strong>of</strong>knowledge? For Aristotle, to know something is essentially to know the cause <strong>of</strong> it; that is, to have asystematic, scientific understanding <strong>of</strong> things (episteme) is to know the causes by which things are broughtabout.A. In effect, Aristotle says that a claim that someone knows that a right-angle triangle has 180 degrees can beunderstood in one <strong>of</strong> two ways.1. A person may know that a triangle has 180 degrees because she has measured the angles and sees thattheir sum is 180 degrees, or she may know that by definition a triangle has 180 degrees and, thus,knows this <strong>of</strong> all triangles without measuring any <strong>of</strong> them.2. What is the difference between the knowledge <strong>of</strong> one sort and the other? In one case, what is known isknown by experience and does not rise to the level <strong>of</strong> episteme. In contrast, developed knowledge,such as could be gained by studying geometry, is a knowledge <strong>of</strong> the regulative principles and lawsthat govern the affairs <strong>of</strong> things, not simply factual knowledge <strong>of</strong> this or that.B. Of course, to say that knowledge requires an understanding <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong> things is to raise a questionabout just what a cause is. “Causation” can be understood in several senses.1. Every identifiable thing that exists is made <strong>of</strong> some particular material and could not exist except as aresult <strong>of</strong> that material. The marble <strong>of</strong> which a statue is made is, thus, the material cause.2. Every such thing is recognizable as a given type or form <strong>of</strong> thing. This “form,” then, must be presentfor the thing to be what it is. In this respect, the shape <strong>of</strong> the statue and its resemblance to an original isits formal cause.3. But form is imparted to matter by strokes and blows and other forms <strong>of</strong> mechanical influence. Theshape <strong>of</strong> the statue is carved out <strong>of</strong> the stone by chisel and hammer; these are the efficient cause <strong>of</strong> thestatue.4. The ultimate understanding <strong>of</strong> the object stems from the intelligent design that the object itselfrealizes. Aristotle refers to this as the final cause—that is, the final thing realized in time, although it isfirst in conception.C. Truly developed knowledge embraces not only the material, efficient, and formal causes, but the that forthe sake <strong>of</strong> which these causes were recruited. To understand x is to know what x is for, what its purpose orend, its telos, is. Thus does Aristotle seek teleological explanations as ultimate.D. Questions <strong>of</strong> what things are for are also central to Aristotle’s ethical and political thought. We havepurposes and ends as the kinds <strong>of</strong> beings we are; how are those to be reached? How does the polis aid orhinder those ends?1. Our knowledge <strong>of</strong> ourselves must be grounded in a respect for just what our defining abilities achievebecause these very abilities reveal the that for the sake <strong>of</strong> which….2. The developed knowledge that we have leads us to an understanding that the things <strong>of</strong> the universe,including living things, instantiate a plan; they fit in. Nature does not do things without a purpose. Theultimate question for understanding, then, is: “How does this fit into things? What is it for? Whatpurpose does it serve?”3. We know at the outset that nothing with pattern and design comes about accidentally. As Aristotlesays, “If the art <strong>of</strong> shipbuilding were in the wood, we would have ships by nature.” Wood, however, isthe material cause <strong>of</strong> the ship, and the workers who build the ship are its efficient cause.4. The art <strong>of</strong> shipbuilding is finally in the ship’s designer. It is the designer who knows what ships are forand how that purpose is served by the right materials, rightly assembled. To “know” in this sense is tocomprehend far more than anything conveyed by the mere material composition <strong>of</strong> an object.©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!