10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. So far as it can coexist with the freedom <strong>of</strong> all according to a universal law, it is the one sole originalinborn right belonging to all people.V. These lines provide a foundation for one <strong>of</strong> the most influential works in contemporary philosophy <strong>of</strong> law, JohnRawls’s A Theory <strong>of</strong> Justice.A. As with Kant, Rawls’s goal is the preservation <strong>of</strong> freedom from the compulsory will <strong>of</strong> another.B. Kant’s categorical imperative supports what Rawls calls the difference principle: Social and economicinequalities should be arranged so that they are to the greatest benefit <strong>of</strong> the least advantaged before theyimprove the condition <strong>of</strong> the more advantaged.C. However, Rawls’s A Theory <strong>of</strong> Justice is incomplete. It is surely not a Kantian maxim that the claim onehas on the general resources is proportioned to the degree <strong>of</strong> disadvantage.D. There is a small step, actually, from the position that law is no more than a social instrument to the use <strong>of</strong>law to secure social conditions dictated by theories that are presented as if they were protected fromcriticism, rather than outcomes <strong>of</strong> criticism.E. <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> law is extremely useful at the level <strong>of</strong> criticism. It makes no promises, however, at the level<strong>of</strong> great abiding and true discoveries.Recommended Reading:Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard, 1977.Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, 1980.Hart, H. L. A. The Concept <strong>of</strong> Law. Oxford, 1961.Questions to Consider:1. How is natural law theory reconciled to the utter diversity <strong>of</strong> legal precepts in different cultures at differenttimes?2. Is Kant’s philosophy <strong>of</strong> law in any sense a practical jurisprudence?3. If law is sensitive to such factors as what a judge has for breakfast, what claim does it have on our fidelity?28©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!