10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Slavery is commonplace in all <strong>of</strong> recorded history and <strong>of</strong>ten predicated on the belief that some personsor tribes or religious groups or races are simply inferior to their enslaving masters.E. The closest we come to a discussion <strong>of</strong> universal individual rights is in some <strong>of</strong> the precepts <strong>of</strong> the ancientCynics.1. Diogenes (412–323 B.C.) was a leader <strong>of</strong> this radically “democratic” school <strong>of</strong> philosophy, opposed toclass hierarchies and even slavery.2. Here, too, however, notions <strong>of</strong> universal brotherhood did not capture the sense <strong>of</strong> “rights” as such, butsomething more akin to a naturalism that requires social and political life to be stripped <strong>of</strong> what ismerely artificial and self-serving.II. Perhaps the most significant development in conceptions <strong>of</strong> justice was that introduced by the early churchfathers, especially by St. Augustine in his discussion <strong>of</strong> conscience and freedom <strong>of</strong> the will.A. Justice on this account is obedience to God’s law, which may place a person in adversarial relationshipswith others and with the state.B. Augustine is also important for his comments on slavery. He sees in slavery only the lust for domination,which condemns the master, but Augustine does not <strong>of</strong>fer any political argument for abolition.C. John Locke, regarded as the prophet <strong>of</strong> American liberty, in the preamble to the Constitution for Carolinain 1669, made express provision for the keeping <strong>of</strong> “leet-men,” holdover serfs <strong>of</strong> medieval Europe, orslaves.D. I know <strong>of</strong> no anti-slavery treatise based on the universal principle <strong>of</strong> human rights before the 17 th century,when the Quakers protested the importation <strong>of</strong> slaves from Africa.III. There are earlier treatises on “human rights” apart from the issue <strong>of</strong> slavery and its abolition.A. The Magna Carta <strong>of</strong> 1215, signed by King John at Runnymede, affirms the rights <strong>of</strong> the Church against theCrown and grants individuals free exercise <strong>of</strong> their religious convictions.1. The document neither affirms universal rights nor focuses on the individual as the bearer <strong>of</strong> suchrights.2. It lays the foundation for principles that will become more sharply defined in the Reformation andthereafter, as to the limits on royal prerogatives and clerical authority.B. By the 18 th century, the secular version <strong>of</strong> this conception <strong>of</strong> justice requires rule by right reason over andagainst any rule based on no more than revelation or tradition.IV. Out <strong>of</strong> the religious wars between Christians and Muslims would come a most significant teaching on the rights<strong>of</strong> man—Francisco de Vittoria’s (1480–1546) De Indis and his De Jure Belli Relectiones.A. Vittoria insists that God’s laws apply to the children <strong>of</strong> God and would preserve them from torture andtorment. The religious ignorance or waywardness <strong>of</strong> a people cannot justify inhumane acts toward them,even during war.B. Vittoria also proposes the idea <strong>of</strong> a “just war,” beyond the ancient concept <strong>of</strong> “might makes right.”1. Christian theological virtues also must be adhered to, including the stipulation that “mercy is theperfection <strong>of</strong> justice.”2. Justice now is measured against motives, and the motives must be faithful to Christian values.C. In the context <strong>of</strong> Christian teaching, the two most significant writers on the subject <strong>of</strong> the just war were St.Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas.1. Augustine made clear that, at the personal level, only self-defense can justify the use <strong>of</strong> lethal force. Atthe level <strong>of</strong> nation-states, however, there is a larger purpose served: the preservation <strong>of</strong> peace. Thisview specifically rules out as permissible motives or justifications for war “the passion for inflictingharm, the cruel thirst for vengeance… the lust <strong>of</strong> power.”2. With Thomas Aquinas, we see the full development <strong>of</strong> a theory <strong>of</strong> just war in an attempt to remove theinconsistency that results in what he <strong>of</strong>fers as the sole justifications for war. For a war to be just, threethings are necessary.3. The authority <strong>of</strong> a sovereign by whose command the war is to be waged.4. A just cause, namely, that those who are attacked should be attacked because they deserve it onaccount <strong>of</strong> some fault.30©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!