10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lecture Forty-SevenWilliam James’s PragmatismScope: If some broad “ism” is to be used as a label for the character <strong>of</strong> James’s work, it would be functionalism.Both philosophy and science may ask about anything what it is for, what part it plays in the larger scheme<strong>of</strong> things, and within that larger scheme <strong>of</strong> things is where life is actually lived. The functionalistperspective translates directly into pragmatism and pluralism.James’s pragmatism ties truth to what are, in fact, the “highest interests” <strong>of</strong> those who pursue truth orattribute it to their assertions and negations. The basis on which even scientific theories stand or fall isultimately pragmatic in this sense, for what cannot serve these highest interests must ultimately yield towhat does. James’s pluralism rejects rigid theories <strong>of</strong> the true and the false; there is no final word on theuniverse or on what the highest interests <strong>of</strong> beings such as ourselves may be.OutlineI. We now move from William James’s radical empiricism to his pragmatism and pluralism.A. The practical side <strong>of</strong> James’s philosophy begins with functionalism. His Principles <strong>of</strong> Psychology put inplace an essentially functionalist psychology and formed the foundation for American behaviorism. Jamestakes the position that the creatures <strong>of</strong> nature, via evolution, obviously are fit to deal with the environmentthey find themselves in.B. There’s a famous brief treatise by James on the question “Does consciousness exist?” The answer Jamesgives is “yes and no.”1. If we think <strong>of</strong> consciousness as immaterial, spaceless, massless but nonetheless an ontologically realthing, no, that doesn’t exist.2. But if we think <strong>of</strong> it as a flow <strong>of</strong> ideas, the stream <strong>of</strong> perceptions and thoughts and feelings, the processby which a supernumerary intelligence knits together experiences over a course <strong>of</strong> time, thenconsciousness is indubitable.C. Without invoking Aristotelian “final causes” or attaching himself to every feature <strong>of</strong> Darwinian biology,James nonetheless ties processes to functions, to larger purposes and possibilities.D. What, then, is the function <strong>of</strong> consciousness? What is it for? What does it achieve that could be achieved inno other way?1. The brain is a fabulously complex organ, consisting <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> cells constantly at work processingsensory input. Yet the result is not simply a “blooming, buzzing confusion.”2. For survival, we must not only be able to sense our environment with great subtlety but react to stimuliinstantly and correctly: This is the “hair-trigger” nature <strong>of</strong> brain functions.3. Our conscious processes are declared to be necessary to regulate the flow <strong>of</strong> mental functioning,through such specifically conscious functions as attention, selection, and will.E. It is out <strong>of</strong> experience that the will itself is constructed. This is James’s ideomotor theory <strong>of</strong> the growth andfunction <strong>of</strong> the will:1. It is under purely reflexive control at first, as the infant responds to stimuli.2. These reflexive experiences continue, and they persist as a reservoir <strong>of</strong> behavior the individual candraw on.3. By attending to the possibilities around us, we are able, in responding, to select one behavior overanother from the reservoir we have accumulated.F. For James, the will is simply part <strong>of</strong> our nature, as it must be if the game <strong>of</strong> living is to get going in the firstplace.II. James’s pragmatism is tied to his functionalism.A. Critics <strong>of</strong> pragmatism <strong>of</strong>ten take pragmatists to be claiming, “If it works, it’s true.” On this understanding,there would be no way to distinguish between competing scientific worldviews if both <strong>of</strong> them led tocomparable practical success.©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!