10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. In the final state, we’re all supposed to be Humeans! This is key, because Mill’s philosophy is so closelymapped onto Hume’s that his affinity for Comte was predictable, if not entirely long-lived.C. Note that the term positivism is also used in connection with a certain philosophy <strong>of</strong> law, as in legalpositivism, the subject <strong>of</strong> a later lecture.D. A third sense <strong>of</strong> positivism gets closer to Comte’s use <strong>of</strong> the term and to what Mill works to develop in hisphilosophy <strong>of</strong> science.1. Its most cogent defense comes from Ernst Mach, a great figure in physics at the University <strong>of</strong> Viennalate in the 19 th century.2. His An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Sensation is part <strong>of</strong> his larger project <strong>of</strong> ridding science <strong>of</strong> all metaphysicalspeculation. In a word, you can tell you’re engaged in a scientific enterprise to the extent that you arenot engaged in metaphysical speculations.III. John Stuart Mill should be understood as promoting a philosophy <strong>of</strong> science compatible with Mach’s and withthe general positivistic view <strong>of</strong> science.A. Science is what takes place in the domain <strong>of</strong> experience. It is an empirical enterprise.B. Mill goes so far as to define matter itself as but “the permanent possibilities <strong>of</strong> sensation,” meaning that thematerial world is a permanent possibility <strong>of</strong> sensation. Reality exists ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it is the subject <strong>of</strong>experience.1. He rejects rationalist arguments <strong>of</strong> philosophy, saying that the introspective method employed isfaulty. By reflecting on what we recall from our early years, we fail to come up with any experiencethat might have conveyed an idea and incorrectly conclude that our current awareness is “intuition.”2. Mill places in opposition to this what he calls the psychological method. He argues that we learnthings in the present by being presented with what it is to be learned, being rehearsed through repeatedpresentations, and forming the necessary associations. Mill is very much the echo <strong>of</strong> Hume in thisargument.C. With Mill, the problem <strong>of</strong> knowledge solves itself in that well-known empiricistic way, fortified bymethods <strong>of</strong> experimental inquiry. In Mill’s treatise on inductive logic, he actually sets forth a methodologyfor experimental science.1. According to the principles <strong>of</strong> concomitance, A is the cause <strong>of</strong> B whenever, in presenting A, you canbring B about.2. The method <strong>of</strong> agreement would have the experimenter record all factors present whenever B occurs.3. The method <strong>of</strong> difference is comparable; now we look to see if there is an event whose presence isalways the case when B occurs, but whose absence is matched by the absence <strong>of</strong> B.4. There are other “methods” and various refinements <strong>of</strong> each. In the end, a manipulability hypothesisgrounds the entire approach: A is the cause <strong>of</strong> B when—taking B to be an empirical feature <strong>of</strong> theworld—A can be used to manipulate that feature <strong>of</strong> the world.IV. In the matter <strong>of</strong> ethics—the problem <strong>of</strong> conduct, as we’ve called it—Mill says the right test ethically is notwhether something holds up in logic but whether it holds up in life.A. He thinks that, with some significant modifications, Bentham got it right. We do what we do chiefly ascreatures <strong>of</strong> nature, constituted in such a way as to maximize our pleasures and minimize our pains.B. What Mill concludes is that the most significant sources <strong>of</strong> human activity are grounded in considerations<strong>of</strong> utility. The ultimate test <strong>of</strong> a course <strong>of</strong> action is whether it is useful, whether it serves some fundamentalhuman purpose.C. But Mill does not want to be misunderstood in affirming utilitarianism as the standard by which we judgethe ethical content <strong>of</strong> actions.1. He rebukes those who see utilitarianism as a caricature <strong>of</strong> the Epicurean: “Eat, drink, and be merry, fortomorrow you shall die.”2. Mill’s thesis is that when people set out to assign utilities to courses <strong>of</strong> action, what they include iswhat makes life more meaningful, more developed, more purposive, and more under rational control.3. The ultimate pain is a life that is not authentically one’s own, and what is pr<strong>of</strong>oundly useful is ameaningful and fully lived life.©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!