10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lecture Twenty-TwoScholasticism and the Theory <strong>of</strong> Natural LawScope: Thomas Aquinas is the most celebrated <strong>of</strong> the scholastic philosophers. His treatises on law would form thefoundation <strong>of</strong> critical inquiry in jurisprudence for centuries. But his “natural law” theory is also a gloss onThomistic psychology, for as he says, “If our natures were different, our duties would be different.” Thusdo we find Thomas Aquinas defining law as an ordinance <strong>of</strong> reason, promulgated by one who isresponsible for the good <strong>of</strong> the community. In other words, the Thomistic psychology is derivable from ananalysis <strong>of</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> life most able to realize human potentialities most fully. A rule <strong>of</strong> law is “natural,”then, when its aim is the provision <strong>of</strong> those basic goods that are, at once, basic and good in virtue <strong>of</strong> thenature <strong>of</strong> human nature.OutlineI. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) was the great 13 th -century Dominican figure whose Scholastic philosophycontinues to dominate thought in the religious philosophy <strong>of</strong> the Catholic Church.A. Thomas was a child <strong>of</strong> privilege. His father was Count <strong>of</strong> Aquino and his mother, Theodora, Countess <strong>of</strong>Teano. His early promise as a child schooled by the Benedictines resulted in advanced study in the liberalarts at Naples, where he committed himself to a religious vocation. By the age <strong>of</strong> 20, he was a Dominicanfriar.B. In Cologne, under the teaching <strong>of</strong> Albertus Magnus, Thomas’s full promise became apparent. He earned ateaching position at Paris, where he would also earn a doctorate. By the time <strong>of</strong> his early 30s, he was acelebrity, attracting the best students and serving as an intellectual resource to the princes <strong>of</strong> the church.C. Outside <strong>of</strong> Catholic philosophy, Aquinas is probably best known and most widely read for his treatises onnatural law. He was tutored in the law, and in the 13 th century, the European world again was in possession<strong>of</strong> Roman law. At the same time, the church required legally trained scholars to fight the daily wars onheresies and address the complexities <strong>of</strong> relationships between the secular and clerical worlds.II. For a mind <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> Aquinas’s, however, law was much more than a set <strong>of</strong> procedures for settlingdisputes. It was recognized as an expression <strong>of</strong> the rational order itself and was not removed from humanpsychology, ethics, philosophy, politics, and religion. We find his most systematic treatment <strong>of</strong> law inQuestions 90 to 108 <strong>of</strong> his Summa Theologiae.A. The place to begin, however, is in the first part <strong>of</strong> the Summa Theologiae, Questions 75–89, whichsummarize his position on human nature. The format is the established one, found in Abelard’s Sic et Non.We begin with a question, whether the soul is a body, for example, then confront arguments for andagainst.1. The first objection to the proposition that the soul is a body is: “It would seem that the soul is a body,for the soul is the moving principle <strong>of</strong> the body, nor does it move unless moved.”2. Against such objections is placed the contrary position: “Augustine says that the soul is ‘simple’ incomparison with the body, inasmuch as it does not occupy space by its bulk.”3. Then, Aquinas <strong>of</strong>fers his own answer, followed by statements designed to meet all the objections. Hisreply to Objection 1, for example, is: “As everything which is in motion must be moved by somethingelse, a process which cannot be prolonged indefinitely, we must allow that not every mover is moved.”4. Here, then, is the essential form <strong>of</strong> the discourse. On the question <strong>of</strong> human nature, followingAristotle, Thomas adopts the hylomorphic thesis: Man is a composite <strong>of</strong> body and soul, where the soulis “the form <strong>of</strong> the body.” Just as the process <strong>of</strong> sensation is both a power <strong>of</strong> the soul and a process thatrequires material organs, so the whole man is an enmattered being whose psychic processes arerealized through corporeal operations.B. On the question <strong>of</strong> knowledge, Aquinas distinguishes the human and divine intellect, the latter being in thevery essence <strong>of</strong> God, whereas the former is but a power or faculty <strong>of</strong> the soul.1. In this, it is included among several powers, such as sensation, appetite, and the will.28©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!