E. Further, to the intellectual virtues <strong>of</strong> Aristotle must be added the theological virtues infused in us by God:faith, hope, and charity.1. What would Aristotle make <strong>of</strong> charity? He describes magnanimity as a virtue: Not only should we bevirtuous, but we should be virtuous in a large-hearted and generous way, not grudgingly. This is asclose as Aristotle comes to charity.2. Christian charity, in contrast, is not putting oneself forward but sharing what one has, not taking foroneself even what one deserves if another is in need. Absent this theological virtue, the Christiancannot know salvation.3. Faith, as Aquinas means it, would be almost repugnant to Aristotle. If the word refers to asuperstitious rejection <strong>of</strong> the evidence <strong>of</strong> sense and the counsels <strong>of</strong> reason, it cannot be a virtue.4. On the Thomistic account, if our duty is to know the divine essence, we must recognize that rationalityand the evidence <strong>of</strong> the senses will take us in that direction but can never help us achieve the goalcompletely. There are mysteries in creation that only faith can reach, most importantly, God’s <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong>salvation.IV. The problem <strong>of</strong> conduct for Aquinas is the problem <strong>of</strong> reconciling us to the eternal law. It is the path to or awayfrom salvation and eternal happiness.A. Right conduct is not simply a matter <strong>of</strong> making sure one’s life in the political community is a decent one,that one is civically responsible, and so on. The problem <strong>of</strong> conduct now is inextricably bound up withnotions <strong>of</strong> a life that is committed to knowing God, to loving God, and to becoming worthy <strong>of</strong> God’spresence in the life to come.B. In this undertaking, the rule <strong>of</strong> law guides and serves. Defined by Aquinas as “an ordinance <strong>of</strong> reasonpromulgated by one who has responsibility for the good <strong>of</strong> the community,” law appeals to the rational side<strong>of</strong> our nature. The Thomistic theory <strong>of</strong> law is a natural law theory, much in the sense that Aristotle, Cicero,and the Roman law itself understood the relationship: Law is “natural” to creatures <strong>of</strong> a certain kind.C. In the thrall <strong>of</strong> addiction to our own desires and their satisfaction, we neglect those basic goods by which aflourishing and worthy life is served.D. How do we protect against ourselves in this regard? Apart from the gift <strong>of</strong> grace and the blessings <strong>of</strong>heaven, there are more immediately perceptible means <strong>of</strong> improvement and immunity: the well-orderedstate and the realm <strong>of</strong> justice.E. Taking human nature to be an expression <strong>of</strong> divine love, Aquinas finds the children <strong>of</strong> God placed here fora purpose. That purpose is for what is best in us to flourish, and what is best in us is the capacity for anintegrated, wholesome family life; for responsibilities to the church; to conduct ourselves in a prudentmanner; to desire the good and to shun evil; and to shun what cannot be in the interest <strong>of</strong> a rational being.F. We do have the potentiality for developing the moral and intellectual virtues by study and contemplation.We must also deploy, finally, the theological virtues so that the form <strong>of</strong> life we live matches up in a properway with the life that Jesus lived.V. Stepping out <strong>of</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> religion, we find in Thomas Aquinas a towering intellect, yet toward the end <strong>of</strong>his life, he turned away from scholarship. He thought so deeply and persistently on the meaning <strong>of</strong> life that hecame to find words incapable <strong>of</strong> expressing truths that can only be known by the grace <strong>of</strong> God.Recommended Reading:Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, 1980.George, R., ed. Natural Law Theory. Oxford, 1992.Questions to Consider:1. Conclude whether one can actually develop psychology “backwards,” that is, by starting with a theory <strong>of</strong> basicgoods for human beings and, from this delineation <strong>of</strong> goods, constructing a theory <strong>of</strong> human nature.2. Explain on what grounds the fall <strong>of</strong> Adam in some way would “justify” or render reasonable the institution <strong>of</strong>slavery.30©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership
Lecture Twenty-ThreeThe Renaissance⎯Was There One?Scope: From Petrarch in the south to Erasmus in the north the spread <strong>of</strong> humanistic thought would collide with thedeeper convictions <strong>of</strong> an age seeking to refine and defend the faith. Renaissance humanism, with itsemphasis on human dignity and a progressivism based on the power <strong>of</strong> knowledge, wealth, and politicalinfluence, would alarm many <strong>of</strong> the deeply religious minds <strong>of</strong> the age.The Renaissance hosted an especially intense form <strong>of</strong> the age-old conflict between faith and reason, thesacred and the pr<strong>of</strong>ane, the temporal and the eternal. Two figures vividly exemplify the possibilities:Erasmus and Luther. But there are also such luminaries as Valla and Ficino, Savanarola and GiordanoBruno, Michelangelo and Leonardo. Here in the Renaissance <strong>of</strong> the south and <strong>of</strong> the north natural magicwill begin to evolve into natural science, and the revival <strong>of</strong> classical humanistic thought would occur in thecontext <strong>of</strong> vulgar extravagance, crass commercialism, and witch hunts.OutlineI. In this lecture, we return to the question: “Was there a Renaissance?” but this time, we look at the Renaissancethat began in Florence in the quattrocento.A. The civic dimensions <strong>of</strong> life were <strong>of</strong> utmost concern at the time. The mathematician Alberti’s (1404–1472)text on architecture, De architectura, records the relationship between the physical structure <strong>of</strong> the city andthe quality <strong>of</strong> life therein.1. Alberti’s discussions <strong>of</strong> the sheer joy <strong>of</strong> his villa and its gardens find him citing Horace and Pliny,revealing one <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> Renaissance writers: their personal identification with leadingfigures <strong>of</strong> the classical period. Alberti sees in Rome a heavenly combination <strong>of</strong> vernal beauty andcleansing atmosphere, and he emphasizes the idea that architectural principles work toward such ends.2. The design <strong>of</strong> buildings, he says, must be based on “main lines in strict proportion and regularity, lestthe pleasing harmony <strong>of</strong> the whole should be lost in the attraction <strong>of</strong> individual parts.” No Gothiccathedral would meet these criteria!3. In 1452, Alberti’s treatise De Re Aedificatoria appeared and would come to be the bible forRenaissance architects. Dedicated to Pope Nicholas V, it defended the classical, harmonious, andessentially “musical” structure <strong>of</strong> art—its conformity with principles <strong>of</strong> harmony as abstractly revealedin mathematics.B. In working with two popes and many patrons, Alberti led an aesthetic movement in which politics, finance,piety, and civics were integrated, much to the benefit <strong>of</strong> all. Concern throughout was with just what it isabout a city that makes it the right kind <strong>of</strong> place to live.C. The city was now understood as having definite moral purposes. It is a place in which we learn lessons andrealize possibilities, a place in which an essentially progressive being can make his way.1. To be sure, the ancient polis was also understood as having centrally moral purposes, but Athens wasnot the place where one came to make one’s mark as a progressive, organic being, defining oneselfanew, concealing a lackluster past, or parleying one’s talents into sources <strong>of</strong> wealth and standing.2. The Renaissance, however, embodies this idea <strong>of</strong> progress: Depending on one’s initiative, one’s life,no matter where it begins, can end in a different place. People can move about and engage in differentkinds <strong>of</strong> business. This is a safer and more mobile world, and with that mobility, complex social issuesarise.II. Let us briefly consider another Florentine, by adoption, Leonardo Bruni (1369–1444). Bruni served as secretaryto successive popes and briefly as chancellor <strong>of</strong> Florence in 1410, returning there in 1415 and remaining for therest <strong>of</strong> his life. Bruni writes a history <strong>of</strong> Florence so well received as to have Florentine citizenship conferred onhim and his progeny.A. Bruni was the leader <strong>of</strong> a movement <strong>of</strong> thought and culture that revived the Greek classics through Latintranslations <strong>of</strong> Aristotle, Plato, Plutarch, and Demosthenes. His history <strong>of</strong> Florence emphasizes thefreedoms long enjoyed by Florentines, who were never under the control <strong>of</strong> imperial Rome. Bruni’s©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership 31
- Page 3 and 4:
Daniel N. Robinson, Ph.D.Philosophy
- Page 6 and 7:
Lecture OneFrom the Upanishads to H
- Page 8 and 9:
E. The Upanishads would merge us wi
- Page 10 and 11:
2. Despite their oracles, priests,
- Page 12 and 13:
4. Looking at geometry, we are told
- Page 15 and 16:
E. The contribution of pre-Socratic
- Page 17 and 18:
of the mystery of earth itself impe
- Page 19 and 20:
Lecture SixHerodotus and the Lamp o
- Page 21 and 22:
Lecture SevenSocrates on the Examin
- Page 23 and 24:
Xenophon. Memorabilia. Cornell Univ
- Page 25 and 26:
II. A philosopher is engaged in the
- Page 27 and 28:
Lecture NineCan Virtue Be Taught?Sc
- Page 29 and 30:
Lecture TenPlato’s Republic⎯Man
- Page 31 and 32:
Annas, J. “Classical Greek Philos
- Page 33 and 34: III. The dominant school of Greek m
- Page 35 and 36: 1. Epistemonikon is a special featu
- Page 37 and 38: Timeline800-600 B.C.E. ............
- Page 39 and 40: 1705...............................
- Page 41 and 42: 1873...............................
- Page 43 and 44: Functionalism: The view that consci
- Page 45 and 46: Tabula rasa: A blank slate. In the
- Page 47 and 48: progress in one of its most summoni
- Page 49 and 50: John Locke (1632-1704): Physician a
- Page 51: The Great Ideas ofPhilosophy, 2 nd
- Page 54 and 55: Table of ContentsThe Great Ideas of
- Page 56 and 57: Lecture ThirteenAristotle on Friend
- Page 58 and 59: C. Aristotle is recovering the Home
- Page 60 and 61: III. The problem of conduct is then
- Page 62 and 63: C. The Stoic account relies on the
- Page 64 and 65: Lecture SixteenThe Stoic Bridge to
- Page 66 and 67: Recommended Reading:Bede. A History
- Page 68 and 69: III. Roman law successfully permitt
- Page 70 and 71: Lecture EighteenThe Light Within⎯
- Page 72 and 73: B. Augustine approaches the problem
- Page 74 and 75: B. Very early, the Islamic commitme
- Page 76 and 77: Lecture TwentySecular Knowledge⎯T
- Page 78 and 79: IV. The third great institutional c
- Page 80 and 81: 1. Scholasticism was an attempt to
- Page 82 and 83: Lecture Twenty-TwoScholasticism and
- Page 86 and 87: historical volumes tell Florentines
- Page 88 and 89: Lecture Twenty-FourLet Us Burn the
- Page 90 and 91: 1. First, the courts required a doc
- Page 92 and 93: 650-850 C.E. ......................
- Page 94 and 95: 1794...............................
- Page 96 and 97: Apatheia: Freedom from pathos and s
- Page 98 and 99: ut cannot know what it is. Ultimate
- Page 100 and 101: Biographical NotesAeschylus (525-45
- Page 102 and 103: Claude Adrien Helvetius (1715-1771)
- Page 104 and 105: Socrates (c. 469-399 B.C.): Greek p
- Page 107 and 108: Daniel N. Robinson, Ph.D.Philosophy
- Page 109 and 110: Scope:The Great Ideas of Philosophy
- Page 111 and 112: B. This expansion, however, does no
- Page 113 and 114: 1. This standard essentially rules
- Page 115 and 116: Lecture Twenty-SevenNewton⎯The Sa
- Page 117 and 118: Lecture Twenty-EightHobbes and the
- Page 119 and 120: Recommended Reading:Hobbes, T. Levi
- Page 121 and 122: B. Other things can be known to be
- Page 123 and 124: Lecture ThirtyNo Matter? The Challe
- Page 125 and 126: Lecture Thirty-OneHume and the Purs
- Page 127 and 128: Lecture Thirty-TwoThomas Reid and t
- Page 129 and 130: efore him were not always faithful
- Page 131 and 132: 2. His Letters on the English makes
- Page 133 and 134: Lecture Thirty-FourThe Federalist P
- Page 135 and 136:
VI. The Federalist Papers and the g
- Page 137 and 138:
III. Kant argues that there is some
- Page 139 and 140:
Lecture Thirty-SixMoral Science and
- Page 141 and 142:
Questions to Consider:1. A hypothet
- Page 143 and 144:
650-850 C.E. ......................
- Page 145 and 146:
1794...............................
- Page 147 and 148:
Apatheia: Freedom from pathos and s
- Page 149 and 150:
ut cannot know what it is. Ultimate
- Page 151 and 152:
Biographical NotesAeschylus (525-45
- Page 153 and 154:
Claude Adrien Helvetius (1715-1771)
- Page 155:
Socrates (c. 469-399 B.C.): Greek p
- Page 159 and 160:
Daniel N. Robinson, Ph.D.Philosophy
- Page 161 and 162:
Scope:The Great Ideas of Philosophy
- Page 163 and 164:
C. Though his system would be mocke
- Page 165 and 166:
1. There is nothing in the physics
- Page 167 and 168:
F. To include Hegel within the trad
- Page 169 and 170:
Lecture FortyThe Aesthetic Movement
- Page 171 and 172:
insisted that our very character is
- Page 173 and 174:
III. Nietzsche was an admirer and o
- Page 175 and 176:
B. In the final state, we’re all
- Page 177 and 178:
Lecture Forty-ThreeDarwin and Natur
- Page 179 and 180:
2. There is room for altruism but o
- Page 181 and 182:
1. He is a Hegelian who stands Hege
- Page 183 and 184:
Lecture Forty-FiveThe Freudian Worl
- Page 185 and 186:
B. How can repressed elements be un
- Page 187 and 188:
III. What figures in the human imag
- Page 189 and 190:
Lecture Forty-SevenWilliam James’
- Page 191 and 192:
Questions to Consider:1. Conclude w
- Page 193 and 194:
III. As long as we subscribe to a
- Page 195 and 196:
Timeline800-600 B.C.E. ............
- Page 197 and 198:
1705...............................
- Page 199 and 200:
1873...............................
- Page 201 and 202:
Functionalism: The view that consci
- Page 203 and 204:
Tabula rasa: A blank slate. In the
- Page 205 and 206:
progress in one of its most summoni
- Page 207 and 208:
John Locke (1632-1704): Physician a
- Page 209:
The Great Ideas ofPhilosophy, 2 nd
- Page 212 and 213:
Table of ContentsThe Great Ideas of
- Page 214 and 215:
Lecture Forty-NineAlan Turing in th
- Page 216 and 217:
C. Searle thinks that the missing i
- Page 218 and 219:
3. Even activities could be simulat
- Page 220 and 221:
B. The inclination to classify is a
- Page 222 and 223:
Lecture Fifty-TwoPhilosophy of Scie
- Page 224 and 225:
V. These debates illustrate a far l
- Page 226 and 227:
1. The two had in common the idea t
- Page 228 and 229:
Questions to Consider:1. What does
- Page 230 and 231:
C. Locke and others emphasized that
- Page 232 and 233:
Lecture Fifty-FiveWhat Makes a Prob
- Page 234 and 235:
B. Kant suggests that the moral law
- Page 236 and 237:
1. Proponents have argued that so m
- Page 238 and 239:
Lecture Fifty-SevenOn the Nature of
- Page 240 and 241:
2. So far as it can coexist with th
- Page 242 and 243:
3. Slavery is commonplace in all of
- Page 244 and 245:
3. Does the just-war theorist have
- Page 246 and 247:
B. The quadrivium comprised arithme
- Page 248 and 249:
2. He argues that the former is pre
- Page 250 and 251:
1. The objects of the knowable worl
- Page 252 and 253:
etween a world of beauty and one of
- Page 254 and 255:
⎯⎯⎯. On Free choice of Will.
- Page 256 and 257:
Herodotus. The Persian Wars. G. Raw
- Page 258:
———. Toward a Science of Huma