10.07.2015 Views

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

Great Ideas of Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C. The Stoic account relies on the notion <strong>of</strong> oikeion, natural affinities, an appropriateness that expresses theorder <strong>of</strong> nature itself. Nature as an expression <strong>of</strong> the logos is an ordered realm, governed by laws thatcollectively establish what is “right” for the entities that compose it.1. The essential nature <strong>of</strong> law or morals is rational, proportionate, unprejudiced. It is also presented andcomprehended by way <strong>of</strong> language, and this fact leads the Stoics to a rather interesting conclusion.2. Only one creature has language, and therefore, only one creature can deal with the sorts <strong>of</strong> abstractionsthat are central to the rule <strong>of</strong> law and to an ethical life: a human creature.3. Mankind is, thus, distinguished from the rest <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> nature. It is only the linguistic communitythat is able to participate in moral, civic, and political life.4. The Stoics contended that there is something about the rational power <strong>of</strong> humanity that confers specialpowers generative <strong>of</strong> rights. It is in virtue <strong>of</strong> the powers <strong>of</strong> abstraction and comprehension that wehave liberties at all. Liberty, after all, is not anarchy; it is conforming one’s behavior to a principle.D. It can be argued that the Stoics, not the French <strong>of</strong> the 1780s or the authors <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, firstformulated the concept <strong>of</strong> natural rights. They understood that the rule <strong>of</strong> law is a rational order accessibleto rational beings so fashioned as to have a natural affinity to such a rule <strong>of</strong> conduct.E. We see here the development <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> the individual person as the object <strong>of</strong> the law’s regard. Invirtue <strong>of</strong> the logos, we as rational beings come to comprehend the cosmic order <strong>of</strong> things and becomecapable <strong>of</strong> legislating for ourselves to secure, not what is pleasurable but what is fitting.III. Emotion and passion are what most contradict reason. Only a man is able to control his animality and,ultimately, to surface as a fully rational being, now sharing in the universal logos.A. The right disposition to have is that <strong>of</strong> apatheia, not “apathy” in the sense <strong>of</strong> indifference but resignationbefore the fact that the cosmic order is determinative.B. We bring about our own suffering and unhappiness by violating the dictates <strong>of</strong> reason—for example, bywanting what is either unattainable or what is not in our interest.C. The essence <strong>of</strong> the Stoic worldview can be found in the words <strong>of</strong> Epictetus: “Never say <strong>of</strong> anything thatI’ve lost it, only that I’ve given it back.”D. There is an order and a rational plan to things. Nothing happens without a cause; everything is anexpression <strong>of</strong> the overarching logos. The individual must understand his or her place, first within thefamily, then within the civic community.E. The ultimate moral community is the community <strong>of</strong> language-using, reasoning, justifying beings whopossess the natural dispositions and powers that qualify them for life under the rule <strong>of</strong> law.F. On the question <strong>of</strong> good and evil, the Stoics again are defenders <strong>of</strong> a form <strong>of</strong> rationalism that resistssupernatural or mystical explanations. What we really mean by “evil” is a departure from virtue and fromthe natural order <strong>of</strong> things. This argument will later be taken up by Christians theorizing about sin.IV. The Epicureans depart from the Stoics on a number <strong>of</strong> points.A. The Epicureans are resolutely naturalistic, but their creed was not “Eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrowwe die”—far from it. The actual teachings <strong>of</strong> Epicurus and his followers are extremely conservative at thelevel <strong>of</strong> individual behavior and social life.B. One <strong>of</strong> the principle differences between the Epicurean and Stoic system is that the Stoic requires us toenter the political world and participate fully in the affairs <strong>of</strong> the polis. The Epicurean scheme is one thathas us remove ourselves from the hurly-burly <strong>of</strong> daily life.C. The point <strong>of</strong> Epicureanism is to reduce the likelihood <strong>of</strong> pain and suffering, to defer death as long as onecan, and to act in such a way that the likelihood <strong>of</strong> loss is diminished. Pleasure is understood almost innegative terms—as the absence <strong>of</strong> pain.D. Where the Stoics valued friendship as central to rational community, the Epicureans used friends toachieve their central goals. Friendship is a species <strong>of</strong> self-defense, a protection against the vagaries <strong>of</strong> thefuture.E. The Epicurean would be the last one to argue that we should eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we willto die, because to perform these acts and to be so fearful <strong>of</strong> tomorrow’s death is already to be overcome by8©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!