III. The problem <strong>of</strong> conduct is then translated into the question <strong>of</strong> how to achieve that flourishing life that is theultimate end <strong>of</strong> our choices and actions. If the goal <strong>of</strong> all our actions, ultimately, is eudaimonia, then what iseudaimonia for us? Aristotle gives two rather incompatible answers.A. The essence <strong>of</strong> our nature is to reason; therefore, as birds must fly and fish must swim, it follows that themost complete life for humans is the life <strong>of</strong> contemplation <strong>of</strong> things <strong>of</strong> first importance and greatestexcellence.B. Actions performed for their own sake rather than as instrumentally tied to other goods are “godlike,”because the Olympians do not act out <strong>of</strong> necessity. Only the contemplative life is “godlike” in this senseand answers to this description. The contemplation <strong>of</strong> the sublime is not a practical matter; it is not done inorder to achieve some other good, such as wealth or fame or the like.C. But is the contemplative life enough? Does not eudaimonia refer to a form <strong>of</strong> life that includes others? As asocial animal, man cannot flourish in isolation.1. Indeed, Aristotle says that the completed human being is found within the polis, at the hearth, andobedient to the law, not in Homer’s hearthless, stateless, lawless man.2. It is in the nature <strong>of</strong> the completed being to seek out the company <strong>of</strong> equals and enter into enduringfriendships, which by their nature, are founded in principles <strong>of</strong> pleasure, utility, and virtue.3. The principles <strong>of</strong> virtue at the individual level are like the principles <strong>of</strong> law that govern the politicalcommunity itself. The good state will require all <strong>of</strong> us to do what the rational man does by choice and,by enforcement, will make virtue habitual.4. In guiding us toward virtuous conduct, the state renders us fitter, not merely for life in the polis, butfor the most rewarding <strong>of</strong> friendships and the flourishing life that becomes possible thereby.D. What would be the best form <strong>of</strong> life one could live, understood in these terms? The eudaimonic life wouldbe the active life <strong>of</strong> the lawgiver. It would be the life <strong>of</strong> one immersed in the political needs and realities <strong>of</strong>his time and contributing to the polis through his own virtuous conduct, contributing in such a way that thestate, like the person, perfects itself.1. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the law is to secure a reasonable, prudent, balanced, harmonious form <strong>of</strong> life.2. The rule <strong>of</strong> law attracts us, and we attach our fidelity to it, because it has a friendly quality—philikon.It inclines us to behave in ways that are best for us for our own sake.E. How do we broker the seemingly competing claims <strong>of</strong> a life <strong>of</strong> political activity and the contemplative life?1. The answer is that it may not be possible to reconcile these competing claims; even Aristotle <strong>of</strong>fers usno compromise here.2. There is a fundamental tension between a life <strong>of</strong> activity and a life <strong>of</strong> contemplation. Once a scholardecides to devote himself or herself to a life <strong>of</strong> study, which includes the recognition that by nature weare fallible beings, it becomes impossible to take decisive action at the daily political level.3. In contrast, the political leader changes the world, with military force, enacted legislation, tradeagreements, and so on.F. In this view, who do we see on the horizon? Alexander the <strong>Great</strong>, who attempted to Hellenize the world. Inthe process, he also transformed himself, illustrating the dilemma faced by those who seek to balance thecontemplative life with the life <strong>of</strong> political affairs.Recommended Reading:Aristotle. Complete Works. J. Barnes, ed. Princeton, 1984 (especially the Nichomachean Ethics, Eudemian Ethics,and Politics).Robinson, D. N. Aristotle’s Psychology. Columbia, 1989.Questions to Consider:1. Given that the eudaimonic life is only for the few, explain what sort <strong>of</strong> life is right for the many.2. Aristotle granted that non-human animals could experience pleasure and pain but not eudaimonia, because thelatter requires developed rationality. Explain why “happiness” should require developed rationality and inferwhether childhood can truly be eudaimonic?6©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership
Lecture FifteenRome, the Stoics, and the Rule <strong>of</strong> LawScope: Stoic philosophy was first developed in the Hellenistic world after 300 B.C. The Stoic worldview is one <strong>of</strong>a rationally governed universe <strong>of</strong> material entities, each answering to its controlling principle (logos) and,thus, participating in the overall cosmic logos. In its most developed form, Stoicism takes the lawfulness <strong>of</strong>the cosmos as the model on which human life is to proceed. The rule <strong>of</strong> law is the defining mark <strong>of</strong> ourhumanity, installing locally what the logos furnishes universally.The overarching philosophy <strong>of</strong> Rome was that <strong>of</strong> the Stoics, whose commitment to rationality and the rule<strong>of</strong> law provided a durable intellectual foundation for Rome’s imperial administration <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the knownworld.OutlineI. In this lecture, we look at the emergence <strong>of</strong> two new schools <strong>of</strong> philosophy around 300 B.C. One was Stoicism,the father <strong>of</strong> which is generally taken to be Zeno <strong>of</strong> Citium, and the other was Epicureanism, the founder <strong>of</strong> thatbeing Epicurus himself.A. Stoicism was so called because the teaching was done in the stoa poikilE, a painted colonnade in theAthenian agora at the foot <strong>of</strong> the Acropolis. The school has debts to Plato and to Aristotle, as well as to theSophists and the Cynics.B. Stoic ontology is physicalistic but in an interesting and subtle way. If we accept Plato’s standard <strong>of</strong>existence—for something to exist it must be capable <strong>of</strong> acting or <strong>of</strong> being acted upon—then the conclusionthat follows is that only physical objects meet this standard. For most <strong>of</strong> the major writers in the Stoictradition, this was the accepted ontology.C. Logos is the “designing fire” from which the physical world springs. It consists <strong>of</strong> two active elements—fire and air—and two passive elements—earth and water. The combination <strong>of</strong> the former creates pneuma,or “breath,” by which entities become individuated in what is otherwise a totally continuous, uninterruptedfabric <strong>of</strong> physicality.1. In its different influences, pneuma is life-giving and mind-giving. It is the psyche <strong>of</strong> the animalkingdom and <strong>of</strong> human rational power, which according to Stoic teaching, is the dominant faculty inhealthy human life. The dominance is revealed by the Greek word adopted by the Stoics:hegemonikon!2. Stoics also understood that non-physical entities must be included in any valid account <strong>of</strong> reality.Space and time, for example, are not “physical” entities but must be part <strong>of</strong> any valid conception <strong>of</strong>physical reality itself.D. Stoicism retained at its core the notion that reality is governed by law, that all <strong>of</strong> the physical world isgoverned by law, and that human affairs must approximate and be obedient to those same principles <strong>of</strong>lawfulness. The hegemonikon <strong>of</strong> reason must regulate life.II. This ontological position generates the Stoic solution to the problem <strong>of</strong> conduct.A. Granting that the goal <strong>of</strong> our actions is happiness, or eudaimonia, it is obvious that any number <strong>of</strong>conditions may lead to happiness or to misery, depending on the particular circumstances. However, thesource <strong>of</strong> genuine happiness must be that which is unfailing in its effects, and this can be nothing butwisdom itself.B. If what has real existence for the Stoic is a body <strong>of</strong> some kind, there is no room for disembodied “trueforms.” Nonetheless, “body” can manifest itself in extremely rarified fashions, in the form <strong>of</strong> fire or spiritor some animating principle.1. How, then, can we integrate the world <strong>of</strong> bodies with ethics? Justice, moral precepts, and ethicalteaching all have powerful influences on our conduct—they have some sort <strong>of</strong> reality.2. Stoic teaching must explain this objectivity. Morals are not simply customary practices; they have realbeing and force in the world. For them to have such force, they must be able to make appeals toentities capable <strong>of</strong> responding to this kind <strong>of</strong> influence.©2004 The Teaching Company Limited Partnership 7
- Page 3 and 4:
Daniel N. Robinson, Ph.D.Philosophy
- Page 6 and 7:
Lecture OneFrom the Upanishads to H
- Page 8 and 9:
E. The Upanishads would merge us wi
- Page 10 and 11: 2. Despite their oracles, priests,
- Page 12 and 13: 4. Looking at geometry, we are told
- Page 15 and 16: E. The contribution of pre-Socratic
- Page 17 and 18: of the mystery of earth itself impe
- Page 19 and 20: Lecture SixHerodotus and the Lamp o
- Page 21 and 22: Lecture SevenSocrates on the Examin
- Page 23 and 24: Xenophon. Memorabilia. Cornell Univ
- Page 25 and 26: II. A philosopher is engaged in the
- Page 27 and 28: Lecture NineCan Virtue Be Taught?Sc
- Page 29 and 30: Lecture TenPlato’s Republic⎯Man
- Page 31 and 32: Annas, J. “Classical Greek Philos
- Page 33 and 34: III. The dominant school of Greek m
- Page 35 and 36: 1. Epistemonikon is a special featu
- Page 37 and 38: Timeline800-600 B.C.E. ............
- Page 39 and 40: 1705...............................
- Page 41 and 42: 1873...............................
- Page 43 and 44: Functionalism: The view that consci
- Page 45 and 46: Tabula rasa: A blank slate. In the
- Page 47 and 48: progress in one of its most summoni
- Page 49 and 50: John Locke (1632-1704): Physician a
- Page 51: The Great Ideas ofPhilosophy, 2 nd
- Page 54 and 55: Table of ContentsThe Great Ideas of
- Page 56 and 57: Lecture ThirteenAristotle on Friend
- Page 58 and 59: C. Aristotle is recovering the Home
- Page 62 and 63: C. The Stoic account relies on the
- Page 64 and 65: Lecture SixteenThe Stoic Bridge to
- Page 66 and 67: Recommended Reading:Bede. A History
- Page 68 and 69: III. Roman law successfully permitt
- Page 70 and 71: Lecture EighteenThe Light Within⎯
- Page 72 and 73: B. Augustine approaches the problem
- Page 74 and 75: B. Very early, the Islamic commitme
- Page 76 and 77: Lecture TwentySecular Knowledge⎯T
- Page 78 and 79: IV. The third great institutional c
- Page 80 and 81: 1. Scholasticism was an attempt to
- Page 82 and 83: Lecture Twenty-TwoScholasticism and
- Page 84 and 85: E. Further, to the intellectual vir
- Page 86 and 87: historical volumes tell Florentines
- Page 88 and 89: Lecture Twenty-FourLet Us Burn the
- Page 90 and 91: 1. First, the courts required a doc
- Page 92 and 93: 650-850 C.E. ......................
- Page 94 and 95: 1794...............................
- Page 96 and 97: Apatheia: Freedom from pathos and s
- Page 98 and 99: ut cannot know what it is. Ultimate
- Page 100 and 101: Biographical NotesAeschylus (525-45
- Page 102 and 103: Claude Adrien Helvetius (1715-1771)
- Page 104 and 105: Socrates (c. 469-399 B.C.): Greek p
- Page 107 and 108: Daniel N. Robinson, Ph.D.Philosophy
- Page 109 and 110: Scope:The Great Ideas of Philosophy
- Page 111 and 112:
B. This expansion, however, does no
- Page 113 and 114:
1. This standard essentially rules
- Page 115 and 116:
Lecture Twenty-SevenNewton⎯The Sa
- Page 117 and 118:
Lecture Twenty-EightHobbes and the
- Page 119 and 120:
Recommended Reading:Hobbes, T. Levi
- Page 121 and 122:
B. Other things can be known to be
- Page 123 and 124:
Lecture ThirtyNo Matter? The Challe
- Page 125 and 126:
Lecture Thirty-OneHume and the Purs
- Page 127 and 128:
Lecture Thirty-TwoThomas Reid and t
- Page 129 and 130:
efore him were not always faithful
- Page 131 and 132:
2. His Letters on the English makes
- Page 133 and 134:
Lecture Thirty-FourThe Federalist P
- Page 135 and 136:
VI. The Federalist Papers and the g
- Page 137 and 138:
III. Kant argues that there is some
- Page 139 and 140:
Lecture Thirty-SixMoral Science and
- Page 141 and 142:
Questions to Consider:1. A hypothet
- Page 143 and 144:
650-850 C.E. ......................
- Page 145 and 146:
1794...............................
- Page 147 and 148:
Apatheia: Freedom from pathos and s
- Page 149 and 150:
ut cannot know what it is. Ultimate
- Page 151 and 152:
Biographical NotesAeschylus (525-45
- Page 153 and 154:
Claude Adrien Helvetius (1715-1771)
- Page 155:
Socrates (c. 469-399 B.C.): Greek p
- Page 159 and 160:
Daniel N. Robinson, Ph.D.Philosophy
- Page 161 and 162:
Scope:The Great Ideas of Philosophy
- Page 163 and 164:
C. Though his system would be mocke
- Page 165 and 166:
1. There is nothing in the physics
- Page 167 and 168:
F. To include Hegel within the trad
- Page 169 and 170:
Lecture FortyThe Aesthetic Movement
- Page 171 and 172:
insisted that our very character is
- Page 173 and 174:
III. Nietzsche was an admirer and o
- Page 175 and 176:
B. In the final state, we’re all
- Page 177 and 178:
Lecture Forty-ThreeDarwin and Natur
- Page 179 and 180:
2. There is room for altruism but o
- Page 181 and 182:
1. He is a Hegelian who stands Hege
- Page 183 and 184:
Lecture Forty-FiveThe Freudian Worl
- Page 185 and 186:
B. How can repressed elements be un
- Page 187 and 188:
III. What figures in the human imag
- Page 189 and 190:
Lecture Forty-SevenWilliam James’
- Page 191 and 192:
Questions to Consider:1. Conclude w
- Page 193 and 194:
III. As long as we subscribe to a
- Page 195 and 196:
Timeline800-600 B.C.E. ............
- Page 197 and 198:
1705...............................
- Page 199 and 200:
1873...............................
- Page 201 and 202:
Functionalism: The view that consci
- Page 203 and 204:
Tabula rasa: A blank slate. In the
- Page 205 and 206:
progress in one of its most summoni
- Page 207 and 208:
John Locke (1632-1704): Physician a
- Page 209:
The Great Ideas ofPhilosophy, 2 nd
- Page 212 and 213:
Table of ContentsThe Great Ideas of
- Page 214 and 215:
Lecture Forty-NineAlan Turing in th
- Page 216 and 217:
C. Searle thinks that the missing i
- Page 218 and 219:
3. Even activities could be simulat
- Page 220 and 221:
B. The inclination to classify is a
- Page 222 and 223:
Lecture Fifty-TwoPhilosophy of Scie
- Page 224 and 225:
V. These debates illustrate a far l
- Page 226 and 227:
1. The two had in common the idea t
- Page 228 and 229:
Questions to Consider:1. What does
- Page 230 and 231:
C. Locke and others emphasized that
- Page 232 and 233:
Lecture Fifty-FiveWhat Makes a Prob
- Page 234 and 235:
B. Kant suggests that the moral law
- Page 236 and 237:
1. Proponents have argued that so m
- Page 238 and 239:
Lecture Fifty-SevenOn the Nature of
- Page 240 and 241:
2. So far as it can coexist with th
- Page 242 and 243:
3. Slavery is commonplace in all of
- Page 244 and 245:
3. Does the just-war theorist have
- Page 246 and 247:
B. The quadrivium comprised arithme
- Page 248 and 249:
2. He argues that the former is pre
- Page 250 and 251:
1. The objects of the knowable worl
- Page 252 and 253:
etween a world of beauty and one of
- Page 254 and 255:
⎯⎯⎯. On Free choice of Will.
- Page 256 and 257:
Herodotus. The Persian Wars. G. Raw
- Page 258:
———. Toward a Science of Huma