History of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> in KaratuIn the latter part of the 1990s, subsoiling (ripping) was introduced in two districts:Karatu and Babati (Bishop-Sambrook et al. 2004). Key facilitators of conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> in Karatu include KDA, SARI and TFSC. In 1997, a soil conservationproject began in Qurus village. The aim of the project was to encourage theadoption of cover crops such as mucuna, lablab and sunn hemp (Crotalaria spp.)through village demonstrations coordinated by KDA. In 1998/99 mucunaperformed well during the first year of the project, but it was not adopted. It lackedmarketing opportunities as it was a new product without established marketingchannels. Furthermore, prolonged drought led to poor germination of seeds andpoor establishment of cover crops.In 1998/2000, SARI and TFSC conducted joint subsoiling activities and covercrop improvement by introducing lablab, which fetches a ready market and isedible. Development of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> under SARI and TFSC wasin three phases. Phase 1 included subsoiling with tractor (1998) and involved 28free demonstration plots sponsored by GTZ and implemented by TFSC. Thedemonstration aimed at motivating farmers to adopt heavy tillage using the chiselplough in the first year, essentially to break up the hardpan and decompact the soil.Phase 2 introduced cover crops in 1999/2000 in 14 trial sites of subsoiled plots.Phase 3 used no-till and direct planting equipment such as jab planters, draughtanimalpower knife-rollers, no-till planters and sprayers, and tractor-mounteddirect-seed drills introduced in 2002.It was realized that to some extent pigeon pea, which is commonly intercroppedwith maize, could be used as a cover crop. For many years, farmers had observedthe positive impact of pigeon pea on soil fertility, the crop’s ability to break hardpan,and its positive impact on moisture retention and weed control, particularly ofnoxious weeds such as Digitaria spp.7 <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> practices<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> aims to conserve natural resources and to make moreefficient use of them through integrated management of available soil, waterand biological resources. The principles guiding the application of conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> are:• Reduce or minimize soil disturbance (that is, soil disturbance in cropproduction is restricted to the absolute minimum).• Maintain soil cover of live or dead vegetal matter on the soil surface. Thisimplies that crop residue should not be burned or removed from the fields.• Rotate crops over several seasons. In addition to minimizing the build up ofdiseases or pests, crop rotation is essential in sustainable farming as it allowsdifferential use of the soil over time, thereby optimizing plant nutrient usethrough synergy between different crop types. Alternating shallow-rootingcrops with deep-rooting ones is also an important feature in deciding cropsin a rotation.78 Ringo et al.
Soil coverThe source of soil cover for conventional farming has been crop residue thatafter having been chopped for animal fodder is returned to the fields. Managingpermanent soil cover is still a problem in annual crop fields but in coffee plantationsit has been possible. Generally, a large amount of the soil cover is removed for usessuch as livestock feeding, fuel and fencing or is simply burned to get rid of it. Afterbeing introduced to conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>, farmers are striving to ensure soilcover. It is a matter of too little biomass, inadequate knowledge of how to establishpasture plots, and persistent conflicts of interest.In 2000 mucuna and lablab were introduced as cover crops in the case study area.Many farmers prefer lablab because besides being useful in improving soil fertility,the seeds can serve as food and as a cash crop; the leaves can be used as greenvegetables, especially during the dry season when it is not easy to get other greenvegetables. At least 350 farmers under an FFS group scheme have at least a plot ofcover crop, either mucuna or lablab, where more than 60% of the maize fields areintercropped with pigeon peas (see plate section).After harvesting maize, pigeon pea is left in the field to be harvested later; therefore,it covers the area during the dry season and forms a very good canopy.Cover crops are managed mechanically by chopping them with slashers; a fewpeople use knife-rollers. Many farmers are hesitant to use chemicals because of thelack of technical know-how and low purchasing power.In some way soil cover is traditionally practised in the study area but proper managementto fit it into the conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> system is lacking. Farmers interviewed declaredthat soil under pumpkin cover looks better in terms of soil moisture conservation andweed control than in areas devoid of such cover. Limited knowledge of how to managesoil cover, inadequate rainfall, fast-decomposing leguminous biomass (lablab, mucunaand pigeon pea), free-range grazing, cut-and-carry methods of handling crop leftovers,and lack of enough planting materials (seeds) have limited attainment of permanentsoil cover. Details of the corresponding challenges are discussed in section 11.Generally, crop residue is meant for dry feeding for animals or is left in the fieldfor free grazing after harvesting. Managing soil cover is still a big problem underconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> systems, as explained in detail in section 11.Crop rotation under conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>Crop rotation under conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> generally is Dolichos lablab or pigeon peafollowed by maize and then wheat. Farmers also rotate crops in intercropped fieldsof maize and pigeon pea or beans with a pure stand of barley or wheat. Farmersare relatively aware of the benefits they get from crop rotation such as improved soilfertility and control of weeds, pests and diseases. However, in areas with relativelyhigh population density (farm size < 2 acres), farmers want to maximize yields andhave different crops on the same piece of land; hence intercropping remains the mainoption. Households have land enough only to grow their staple food (maize), andcannot reduce the area under maize let alone not grow it for any season. Therefore,Karatu District 79
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49:
Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51:
6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53: villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55: ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63: Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150: Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152: technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154:
In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156:
Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158:
Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives