mainly cover crop practices were adopted. The main pathway in Karatu was theuse of indigenous (traditional) knowledge (cover crop and crop rotation). The useof pigeon pea as a cover crop had been practised in Karatu for a long time whilelablab and mucuna were recent introductions. Again, lablab was preferred tomucuna because lablab is edible (seeds and leaves) and has a ready market. Lablabis normally cooked with maize and banana and is also used instead of beans inmany dishes. In Arusha the same recipe is mixed with sour milk to make a specialmeal (‘loshoro’). Lablab and pigeon pea have a ready market within and outsidethe country. Lablab at the local market in Arusha town can easily fetch a price ofTZS 100,000 per 100-kg bag. In the sowing season of 2003/04, lablab was a scarcecommodity, selling at over TZS 120,000.Pathways of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> implements: Adopting cover cropsmeans introducing a direct seed planter, that is, the hand jab planter and the animaldrawndirect seed planter. Implements adopted were according to the status of afarmer. For example farmers with small acreage (< 2 acres) opted for jab planters,while those with 2–10 acres preferred the oxen-drawn direct seed planter. Thisimplies that adoption depended mostly on farm size. Larger-scale farmers with arelatively bigger area of over 20 acres are more innovative and are generally greaterrisk takers than small-scale farmers.Pathway through groups—farmer field schools: Community members havebeen trained in conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> principles through voluntary groups andorganized demonstration plots of different conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> practices vsconventional practices. Ten farmer field school (FFS) groups with 314 members (158male and 156 female) have been formed in Karatu District. All groups received basictraining in conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> (what it is, its principles, advantages, how to startconservation <strong>agriculture</strong>, etc). Other related issues taught included awareness of HIVand AIDS and how the pandemic affects <strong>agriculture</strong>, how to prepare liquid fertilizer,how to strengthen their groups and get access to credit facilities, how to improve theirdairy cattle by integrating conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> and livestock, seed selection, qualityand sourcing, establishment of an input stockist system, grain borer and other storagelosses and control, microfinance access and management, and farmer organizationand empowerment. Basing on their production problems, the groups went throughan interactive process of selecting possible conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> options that couldbe tried in the group plot. Treatment plots under CASARD includedmaize + lablab; no rippingmaize + lablab + rippingmaize + pigeon pea; no rippingmaize + pigeon pea + rippingfarmer practiceAll FFS groups meet once a week, working on the ecosystem Agroecological SystemAnalysis (AESA), which is an integral part of FFS methodology. The project provideslegume cover crop seed, which has been planted in farmers’ own plots (FFS groupmembers). In addition, each member household in Karatu, that is, 10 FFS groupsx 35 members and non-members, received 0.5 kg lablab or pigeon pea seed. It isreported that many of the households had to acquire more seed from the open84 Ringo et al.
market to meet their requirements. The seed was provided at no cost to the farmers.However, all households that got the seed are expected to ‘pass on’ the exact amountof seed received, that is, 0.5 kg to a next farmer, ensuring more access to the seedand more application of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>—soil cover and crop rotation.Members of FFS groups have benefited from capacity-building interventionsconducted through agricultural implements and inputs support, intensive trainingand set forums for group discussions. Although the CASARD project is in its firstyear of implementation, participating farmers have increased their understandingof the importance of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> technologies and practice. Inlocal institutional capacity building, farmers’ abilities in group organization arestrengthened to facilitate mutual learning and the sharing of information andexperience. One of the greatest achievements is the increased morale of differentcategories of farmers, who engage actively in mobilizing locally available resourcesand use their own initiative to bring about changes in crop production. Workingin groups has helped through sharing experiences and resources and has fosteredsolidarity, in so much as farmers are beginning to speak with one voice in relationto hindrances in crop production such as unavailability of inputs and capital, theneed to form credit and saving societies, and the need for marketing mechanisms.Farmers comprehend the soil-related problems that can lead to stable sustainablecrop production even under adverse weather conditions. Group members canexplain clearly what they have been doing and the significant changes they haveobserved in each treatment. The FFS approach has provided an environmentconducive to rapid dissemination and adoption of new conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>relatedagricultural technologies and practices.Pathways through demonstration plots: Depending on the individualhousehold, results from the 28 free demonstration plots conducted jointly by GTZ/TFSC and SARI that were aimed at motivating farmers to adopt the chisel ploughwere up or down. Alfred, a pioneer farmer, continued with the conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>practices and modified them to suit his environment and economic purchasing power.Out of 15 acres of land, he subsoiled 3 acres in 2001 but he did not continue with thepractice on other plots because it was too expensive for him as an individual to orderthe service from Arusha, 120 km away. He continued producing cover crops andbecome a supplier of lablab seeds, sharing his knowledge with other farmers.Individuals: Alfred is a middle-scale farmer with about 15 acres. He owns atractor and plough-drawn implements such as a ripper, direct-seed planter, andknife-roller, all acquired through a project, and hand hoes. Alfred said, ‘It is difficultto attain permanent cover crops; however, I am on trials. I have observed that fingermillet planted in early January tends to have much biomass, hence it covers the soilwell, and when harvested in July or August it can stay covering the soil up to theshort rains of October or November. Finger millet has more solid biomass thanDolichos lablab, which tends to decompose easily just after harvest.’So suitability of cover crop or crop for permanent soil cover depends on anindividual’s choice. It is based on experience and access to planting materials,direct economic benefits (cash), food security (edible), usefulness as fodder, rainfallamount and distribution.Karatu District 85
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49:
Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51:
6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53:
villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55:
ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63: Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150: Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152: technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154: In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156: Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158: Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives