herbicide was completely abandoned due to its residue effects in the soil and thelack of money to buy it. During the trials, farmers mixed Round-Up with Atrazine,which reduced growth on legume crops. Farmers in Kikatiti normally intercropmaize with beans or pigeon pea. Monsanto, after failing to convince farmers to usetheir herbicides, moved out of the area.5 <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> practicesIntroducing conservation <strong>agriculture</strong><strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> is based on three major principles:1. Minimal soil disturbance with reduced tillage, zero tillage and directplanting2. Permanent soil cover, with the crop itself, cover crops, residues andmulch, to protect the soil from sun, rain, and wind and to feed soilorganisms3. Crop rotations through crop sequences, intercropping, relay croppingor mixed crops to avoid diseases and pestsLabour shortage and low yieldsFarmers are interested in any technology that will increase yield at an affordable costand save labour. The elderly complained of drudgery, especially during weeding inconventional practice. Manual weeding is labour intensive. By the time a farmeris through with weeding the entire farm, the part weeded first will usually showsigns of new weeds and weeding has to be repeated. Therefore, families will weedonly where they can and the remaining part will be done if they can afford hiredlabour. Similarly, preparing land is very labour intensive, engaging whole familiesand renting draught animals for those who do not own cattle. This leads to lowyields from poor timing, late planting and inefficient rainwater use.Soil fertility and degradationSteiner (2002a,b) reported that soil organic matter decomposes more rapidly in thetropics because of the higher temperatures; soil inversion increases soil aeration andaccelerates decomposition. During the focus group discussions, farmers concurredwith Steiner: the main aim of soil inversion is to bury crop residue, thus producingoptimal conditions to germinate seeds, increase water infiltration and eliminateweeds. However, with time, such practices exhaust soil organic matter. Steiner alsonoted that losing soil organic matter deteriorates soil structure, crusts and seals thesoil surface. SCAPA and RELMA identified soil hardpan, soil nutrient depletion,and low soil moisture content as a result of poor retention and failure of rainwaterto infiltrate as the main yield constraints (RELMA 2002). As a result cover cropswere introduced, mainly through SARI, to provide soil cover to replace the cropresidue already depleted from grazing.22 Maguzu et al.
Soil erosionSoil erosion is more pronounced in the maize and beans system in the lowlands. It is stilla major issue in the district despite the conservation programme’s significant efforts infacilitating the construction of terraces and contours, and agroforestry. Unfortunately,contours and agroforestry did not result in a significant increase in yields, but theydid reduce runoff and increase infiltration. Contour construction was perceived astiring and separate from routine land preparation. Few farmers adopted contours andmany recently constructed ones were either destroyed or poorly maintained (RELMA2002). Contour bunds did not enhance water retention, but with the Heifer Project,where fodder was planted alongside the contour bunds, runoff was minimal. Furtherinvestigations on pigeon pea, shrub and fodder crop roots revealed serious restriction inroot depth and water infiltration from hardpan (Mwalley and Mawenya 2002).From the early 1980s Arumeru District has had occasional drought from erraticrainfall, poor rain distribution, lack of good rainwater management and inadequatecrop diversification (Mwalley and Mawenya 2002). In the past much effort was made toconserve soil and water with terraces and contour bunds. This has proved inadequate.Water conservation depends a lot on how the soil is tilled and its effects on soil structure,compaction and soil organic matter. Exposing the soil to sun and rain leads to crusting,runoff, soil erosion and degradation. Therefore, conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> can addressthe low yields under small-scale farming by tackling low soil fertility from depletednutrients, poor soil moisture-holding capacity, hardpan, soil and water erosion, organicmatter loss, labour shortage, and inadequate and uneven rainfall.Implements and powerThe main implement suppliers and implement services are TFSC, NandraEngineering and TFA Arusha. They mostly provide ripper attachments, subsoilersand direct-ripper planters. They also maintain and repair the implements. Theservices are limited, since the suppliers are mainly in urban centres. <strong>Conservation</strong><strong>agriculture</strong> implements include the jab planter, hand hoes, pangas, slashers andanimal-drawn implements, including the ripper, direct seeder, no-till ripper andZamwipe, although it is not widely accepted or used yet. Cost of these implementsis indicated in table 3. Draught animals are the main source of power; they may beowned, shared or hired and are mainly used by small-scale farmers.Table 3. Cost of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> implementsImplementCost (TZS)No-till ripper planter 250,000Ripper with attachments 175,000Jab planter 45,000Zamwipe 20,000Hand hoe 5,000Panga 2,500Slasher 2,000TZS 1000 = USD 1Arumeru District 23
- Page 6: ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10: Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14: February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17: Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18: Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27: Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29: 8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31: Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33: It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35: The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39: MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41: middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43: 4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45: maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 48 and 49: Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51: 6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53: villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55: ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63: Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97:
Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99:
Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101:
Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103:
History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105:
what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107:
to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109:
mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111:
Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113:
study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115:
Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117:
abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119:
availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121:
package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123:
of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125:
Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127:
Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129:
Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132:
ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134:
AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136:
1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138:
3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142:
Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144:
egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148:
slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150:
Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152:
technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154:
In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156:
Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158:
Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives