Executive summaryA conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> case study for Wanging’ombe and Mshewe wards wasconducted between March and September 2005 to document past and currentconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> experiences and develop improved understanding to beshared during the Third World Congress on conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> in Nairobi inOctober 2005.The recommendations came from consultations with development workers in thedistricts, including interviews with 67 people in six villages. These findings wereconfirmed by stakeholders in a workshop held near the end of the study. Thesustenance and livelihood of about 85% of the 28,250 people who live in Msheweof Mbeya District and Wanging’ombe in Njombe District depend on <strong>agriculture</strong>.Concern is growing over the decline in crop productivity from poor financial accessto supplies, unsustainable land use from tilling with the mouldboard plough, lowand poorly distributed rainfall, and decreasing farm size. These wards have beenfortunate to receive funding and technical help in conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> and toverify its effectiveness. Major interventions were introduced over the years:Period Funding organizations Interventions1998–2003 TARP II–MAFS and World Bank Ridges, tied ridges, ripping2001 NAEP and World Bank for Ripping and herbicide weed controlSOFRAIP2001–2003 TARP I–MAFS and World Bank Cover crops, ripping, jab, directseedingAmelioration of hardpanAgroforestry, nurseries for tree seedsand shrubs2001–2002 TARP II, SUA and Norad Ridges, tied ridges, ripping2004–2006 FARM Africa Ripping, cover crops, crop rotations2004–2006 FAO and MAFS (TCP/URT/3002)Cover crops, reduced tillage, croprotationsAlso participating in these conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> trials and promotions were thedistrict councils using village extension officers, researchers from the AgriculturalResearch Institute (ARI) Uyole, development NGOs and suppliers, particularlySEAZ Agricultural Equipment, the Mbeya implement manufacturer.Since conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> was introduced in 1998, 201 households from sixvillages in Wanging’ombe and Mshewe wards were exposed to the technology and71, 35%, became adopters. Most, 44, were newcomers, mostly from Mayale village,who started using conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> in 2004. They probably progressedfaster than the others because they had financial support to acquire implements.Reported conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> benefits came mainly from reduced tillage withthe ox ripper, rather than the complete package involving permanent soil cover andcrop rotations. The few farmers who adopted conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> increasedcrop yields, saved labour, and stabilized crop yield even through drought. However,the yield increase depended much on fertilizer.110 Mkomwa et al.
1 IntroductionOver 80% of the people in <strong>Tanzania</strong>’s southern highlands depend on farming. Agricultureleads the economy, accounting for over half the gross domestic product.Recent stagnating or declining farm productivity ends in food insecurity and poverty.The southern highlands have four administrative regions, Ruvuma, Mbeya, Iringaand Rukwa, cover 245,000 km 2 or 28% of mainland <strong>Tanzania</strong> and have about5.82 million people (URT 2001). Altitude ranges from 400 m to 3000 m; annualrainfall varies from 750 mm in the lower altitudes to 2600 mm in the mountainsand along Lake Nyasa. The tropical and temperate climates favour livestock andcrop production.Farmland in the southern highlands is severely degraded, mainly from exploitivefarming. Anecdotal reports suggest compacted soil and reduced productivity inIsmani in Iringa District can be attributed to poor tilling practice, acidified soil inSongea and Njombe highlands from using inorganic fertilizers improperly, and theGreat Ruaha River drying up from deforestation and poor tilling in watersheds, andovergrazing (Taruvinga 1995). Concern is growing that the declining productivityis from unsustainable farming practices. Continuous tillage with the mouldboardox plough in the sandy Njombe soil has created plough pans and low soil organicmatter (Ley et al. 2003). Low and poorly distributed rainfall in both Wanging’ombeand Mshewe wards means crop failures often occur.<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> is an approach that aims to overcome land degradationand other productivity problems. It consists of three soil and crop managementprinciples—no soil turning, maintaining permanent vegetative soil cover, androtating both cash and cover crops. <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> as initiated in Brazilin the 1980s, and now in some other Latin American countries, has reducedproduction costs, increased yields, increased soil fertility and lowered labour needs.It is a promising alternative for farmers in the southern highlands of <strong>Tanzania</strong>.Individual components—mulching, subsoiling and ripping—have been practised inthe zone for many generations. Research work encompassing all three conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> principles was initiated by the Ministry of Agriculture Research Institute(ARI) Uyole in 1999 after a study visit to Brazil by an institute researcher.Farm trials and promotions introduced in Njombe and Mbarali Districts in 1998centred on ridging with animal traction, tied ridging and ripping compared with theconventional mouldboard ploughing. No cover crops were considered. Weeds weremanaged by hand hoeing in ploughed plots, the ridger in ridged plots and contactherbicide in the ripped plots. Cover crops were screened for disease tolerance,establishment, biomass yield and optimal planting time at ARI Uyole.The <strong>Tanzania</strong> Agricultural Research Project Phase II and <strong>Sokoine</strong> University ofAgriculture (TARP II SUA) introduced a similar initiative in 2001, which targetedthe same soil and water conserving structures but did away with herbicides anddid not use cover crops. Coverage was expanded to include new villages: Mayaleand Kisilo in Njombe District, Matai and Sandulula in Sumbawanga District andNkundi in Nkansi District. Farmers in each village were trained in groups of 15households.Mbeya District 111
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49:
Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51:
6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53:
villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55:
ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59:
Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61:
to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63:
Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65:
and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67:
Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69:
Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71:
Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73:
Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77:
10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79:
Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81:
Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83:
Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150: Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152: technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154: In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156: Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158: Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160: • Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162: 10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164: 12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166: Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168: No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170: Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172: Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174: Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176: Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178: Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180: The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182: Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183: Transferring crop residue for lives