<strong>Tanzania</strong> Association of ForestersAchievements: The <strong>Tanzania</strong> Association of Foresters (TAF), formed in 1976, isa professional non-profit NGO, which unites foresters in <strong>Tanzania</strong> and elsewhere.The association facilitates tree planting and environmental conservation in KaratuDistrict. TAF has been supported financially by Byskogsinsamligen (BSI) of Sweden.The project’s achievements include raising about 2.8 million seedlings and creatingawareness of the importance of tree planting. Communities became tired of treeplanting, however, no longer seeing it as a priority, so TAF switched to agriculturaldevelopment by providing farmers with improved seed varieties and with training.Gap and challenges: TAF project interventions in Karatu focused on treeplanting but with time the community changed its priorities, and TAF was forcedto reorient itself to suit the new interests.National Livestock Extension ProjectAchievements: Administered through the Ministry of Agriculture and sponsoredby the World Bank, the National Livestock Extension Project (NALEP-I and NALEP-II) was a government project that aimed to enhance agricultural activities in KaratuDistrict by improving agricultural practices and building the capacity of extensionists(URT 2004b). It operated between 1995 and 2001. Some of the achievements: 15village agricultural extension officers (VAEOs) were trained on various technologies,4 VAEOs obtained diplomas in general <strong>agriculture</strong>, 25 farmers were trained invarious skills. It also provided the following support: a vehicle, 2 motorcycles, 20bicycles, 5 extension kits, 1 computer set, 1 photocopier, 1 soil kit, and furniture.There was also good achievement in disseminating agricultural technologies tofarmers and increasing the number of farmers who adopted new skills.Gap and challenges: The approach was more top down, planned andimplemented by government. Little attention was given to sustainable <strong>agriculture</strong>through maintaining soil productivity. The focus was purely on conventional<strong>agriculture</strong>. Most of the working instruments provided to extensionists were notdurable—for example, the bicycles were of low quality (URT 2004b).Selian Agricultural Research InstituteAchievements: Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) is one of the mainagricultural research institutes in <strong>Tanzania</strong>. It is a leading player in promotingconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> in the Northern Zone of <strong>Tanzania</strong> including KaratuDistrict. SARI officers have been pioneering and spearheading experiments andfield testing use of indigenous cover crops such as Dolichos lablab, pigeon pea andmucuna. Most of the conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>-related activities are either directlyor indirectly supervised and supported by SARI. SARI is also the main supplier ofcover crop seeds in <strong>Tanzania</strong> and it coordinates subsoiling services in collaborationwith TFSC. Almost 30 demonstration plots on smallholder farms were subsoiledfree of charge by TFSC (with support from GTZ). Participating farmers wereexpected to shift to minimum tillage using the chisel plough or ox plough, and toleave crop residue on the field. Cover crop trials were established under TFSC/GTZ sponsorship to examine the effects of lablab and mucuna on soils and yields74 Ringo et al.
of maize and pigeon pea. Research undertaken by SARI has been strongly linkedto dissemination and training. Farmer field days have been held once a year to raiseawareness in the local community and to distribute cover crop seeds. In addition,a large demonstration site was established next to the monthly market ground tostimulate interest among much wider groups of farmers.Results from field trials conducted between 1999 and 2002 found subsoiled plotstypically yielded 4 t/ha whereas plots that had not been subsoiled yielded only0.75–1 t/ha (Mariki 2003). Cover crops were found to improve yields, soil nutrientstatus, soil moisture, rainwater capture and retention, total biomass and earthwormnumbers. The benefits were often further enhanced if maize stover was left in thefields. According to Bishop-Sambrook et al. (2004), these demonstrable benefitsled to about 250 farmers in Karatu, covering 150 ha, adopting the technologies by2003. By 2003, some farmers had privately continued subsoiling with the help ofTFSC.Gap and challenges: Limited funds and facilities hinder extension work and theintroduction of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> practices. Currently, they are operatingonly in some areas of Karatu, Hanang and Babati Districts (Mariki 2003).<strong>Tanzania</strong> Farmers Service CentreAchievements: <strong>Tanzania</strong> Farmers Services Centre (TFSC) and FSC/DeutscheGesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GTZ) have been promotingconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> in the belief that one of the major factors causing soildegradation is conventional tillage, that is, excessive ploughing by use of tractorand oxen ploughs or even the hand hoe, which together with removing or burningor grazing crop residues leaves the soil exposed to heavy rainfall, sun and wind.With the assistance GTZ, TFSC intervened to improve <strong>agriculture</strong> in KaratuDistrict. They offer farmers subsoiling services with a tractor (TZS 60,000 peracre) In collaboration with SARI, TFSC has a demonstration plot with cover cropsand minimum and no-tillage trials; it holds workshops and courses on sustainable<strong>agriculture</strong>, the use of agricultural machinery and efficient crop production; itsells agricultural machinery and spare parts; and it services agricultural machinery(Bishop-Sambrook et al. 2004). However, as a private company, it was moreinterested in promoting its tractor business and implements, hoping that farmersafter seeing the results of higher yields caused by subsoiling would buy its tractorsor hire the services. The centre worked in close collaboration with the government,especially SARI, for research purposes and to report achievements (Mariki 2003).Challenges: Small-scale farmers found centre prices not affordable. TFSCpreferred to work on large areas of not less than 50 acres at a time, while manysmall-scale farmers have an average of 2–4 acres. On the other hand, TFSCfaced major challenges when dealing with small-scale farmers whose farms werescattered. Some farmers were dishonest and would not declare the exact acreage ofthe area to be subsoiled; some did not pay their debts. Machine operators neededclose supervision. Thus, TFSC clients are large-scale farmers.Karatu District 75
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49: Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51: 6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53: villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55: ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63: Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150:
Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152:
technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154:
In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156:
Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158:
Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives