6 Adapting and diffusing conservation<strong>agriculture</strong>Pathways<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> is a relatively new concept in Arumeru District. Thepathways to adapting and diffusing it have depended on agricultural developmentfacilitators, the farming systems, economics and culture. Moreover, within a village,pathways depend on household innovativeness, purchasing power and the ability toassociate with other farmers to learn. A farmer’s economic and social status affectsadopting an innovation.Small-scale farmers choose jab planters because they are easy to use and maintainfor farmers who usually use hand hoes. For a farmer with more than one acre, a jabplanter is not useful. These farmers choose animal-drawn implements, like rippersand direct seeders, because they reduce drudgery, labour and save time. They likedirect seeders because they can plant straight rows and maximize seed use, so thereis no need to thin later on. In conventional planting, two to four seeds are put in ahole, necessitating thinning later on.Large-scale farmers use their own tractor-driven machinery, including subsoilers,or hire them from the <strong>Tanzania</strong> Farm Service Centre. Commercial farmers haveadopted conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> over the decade, abandoning disc ploughing infavour of tractor-driven chisel ploughs, to harvest water and save on diesel (Mwalleyand Rockstrom 2002). Farming pigeon pea intercropped with maize has been atraditional, continuous practice among farmers in Arumeru. This made it easier tohave pigeon pea as a cover crop, rather than velvet bean (mucuna) and lablab.<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> is associated with other direct benefits to the household,especially the cover crops. Mucuna bean is not associated with economic gain,leading to its slow adoption. But by diversifying crops farmers have realizedthat mucuna offers good soil cover, especially when intercropped with banana.Lablab offers good soil cover and biomass and is preferred over mucuna, sinceit is edible. Among the Meru people it is a delicacy, prominent during culturalinitiation ceremonies and suitable for feeding lactating mothers. Lablab and pigeonpea are readily sold in local markets. Lablab in Arusha can fetch as much as TZS120,000/120 kg (USD 120 compared with USD 18 for maize). In Sakila, pigeonpea is mainly grown for sale; it is uncommon to use it as food.Another important pathway is through involving farmers in farmer groups. It isevident, even during the discussions, that farmers who were members of farmerfield schools were more knowledgeable on conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> and wereready to experiment with conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> on their own farms. In Manyirevillage, a CASARD site, Mrs Temu, Pastor Humphrey, Hilda Chondo, all farmerfield school members, managed to set aside land to try conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>.Different farmers adopted different practices. Mrs Temu was given a plot by herhusband. She practised no-till by using herbicides and ripping when she plantedmaize intercropped with lablab on one side of the plot and maize and pigeon peaon the other. Pastor Humphrey started by constructing contours and planting26 Maguzu et al.
fodder crops along the contours. He ripped his farm and did shallow uprooting ofweeds. He also planted maize, lablab and pigeon pea. Mama Hilda Chondo renteda piece of land and, despite being uncertain if she would have the land the nextseason, she ripped and planted maize with lablab and maize with pigeon pea. Shealso irrigated during the dry season.Some farmers use conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> on and off, depending on supplies,motivation from outsiders and the weather. Pastor Mbise from Sakila adhered toconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> during the Soil <strong>Conservation</strong> and Agroforestry project. Hisfarm had nicely done contours and he still has a ripper. However, after the projectwas phased out he despaired and reverted to conventional tillage, citing lack offinancial power to purchase certified seeds and herbicides.In Ngorbob village, weather dictated the amount of soil cover. Drought led to poorbiomass and soil cover. Lablab was greatly affected, just like other crops, by thedrought in 2002/03, making it impossible to benefit both the farmer and the soil.This led to some pioneer farmers abandoning soil cover and embracing ripping.Those who ripped their farms were able to sustain some crops.Experienced and innovative individuals, like Thomas Loronyo, who have been keento put into practice what they have been taught, have a well-defined farm layout withcontours and agroforestry. Such farmers embrace technology from different sourcesto improve their food security and pass on knowledge to other farmers. Accordingto Loronyo, while he has managed to adopt land ripping and crop rotation, hefailed completely to adopt permanent soil cover because of drought, termites andfree-range grazing. However, he is happy with ripping, since maize yields increasedthreefold and have been able to withstand at least some drought.Among livestock keepers, maize stover is still being removed from the field for feed,while pigeon pea, mucuna, and lablab are left to provide cover. The introduction ofelephant grass has reduced dependence on crop residue and cover crops for animalfeed.Approaches and methodsThe main approaches and methods used to adapt, disseminate and scale upconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> include forming groups, especially farmer field schools,using innovative farmers, farmer visits, group visits, study tours, on-farm trials,demonstration plots, field days and extension publications.Most conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> organizations train individual farmers on certainconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> techniques as the main approach. RELMA in partnershipwith SCAPA mostly trained innovative farmers on agroforestry, contourdevelopment, and crop and livestock management. They wanted to develop farmertrainers who would later train other farmers. Diffusion was slow, since the farmertrainers were few and had social obligations. The farmer trainers were also not paidto teach their fellow farmers.Another common approach was the demonstration trial. SCAPA held demonstrationtrials to test and develop different systems of conservation tillage in partnershipwith farmers with varying rainfall, soil and farm machinery. This was done in threeArumeru District 27
- Page 6: ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10: Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14: February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17: Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18: Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27: Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29: 8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31: Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33: It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35: The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39: MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41: middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43: 4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45: maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47: herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49: Most of the implements, except the
- Page 52 and 53: villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55: ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63: Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101:
Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103:
History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105:
what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107:
to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109:
mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111:
Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113:
study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115:
Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117:
abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119:
availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121:
package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123:
of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125:
Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127:
Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129:
Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132:
ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134:
AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136:
1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138:
3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142:
Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144:
egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148:
slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150:
Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152:
technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154:
In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156:
Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158:
Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives