11.07.2015 Views

Conservation agriculture Tanzania_casestudy.pdf - Sokoine ...

Conservation agriculture Tanzania_casestudy.pdf - Sokoine ...

Conservation agriculture Tanzania_casestudy.pdf - Sokoine ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Despite the soundness of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> principles in improving cropproduction, there are many challenges to overcome before conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>becomes a reality in Karatu. This case study documents experiences of conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> in Karatu District—its practices, achievements, challenges and gaps,and future prospects for it in the study area.2 Study objectivesGeneral objective• To develop a deeper understanding of the experiences of conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> in Karatu District.Specific objectives• To document the biophysical, socio-economic and institutional environmentof the study area• To give a history of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>–related work together with anoverview of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> adaptation, diffusion process and impact• To present gaps and challenges in conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> technologies• To document key issues in conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>, that is, labour, biomassmanagement and suitability of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> under differentbiophysical conditions3 MethodThe Karatu case study began with the formation of a local case study team byintegrating representatives from the Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI),RECODA (Research, Community and Organizational Development Associates)and the agricultural department of the Karatu District Council (KDC). Briefingmeetings included training, discussion of the framework and questionnaires, andallocation of specific duties.Relevant institutions were identified as key sources of information, and a list wasdrawn up of the type of information each institution was expected to provide.Selection of institutions was based on their being involved in soil and waterconservation, agricultural input supply, or manufacture of agricultural implements,and in improving crop production through research and extension services. Amongthe institutions earmarked and visited were SARI, <strong>Tanzania</strong> Farmers’ ServiceCentre (TFSC), Heifer Project <strong>Tanzania</strong>, Karatu Development Agency (KDA),Ngorongoro <strong>Conservation</strong> Area Authority (NCAA), <strong>Tanzania</strong> Association ofForesters (TAF), Centre for Agricultural Mechanization and Rural Technology(CAMATEC), <strong>Tanzania</strong> Engineering and Manufacturing Design Organization(TEMDO), Nandra Engineering Moshi, Mazingira Bora Karatu (MBK), andCanadian Physicians for Aid and Relief. The institutions were visited to relate theiractivities with sustainable <strong>agriculture</strong> and conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> improvement inKaratu District.58 Ringo et al.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!