The direct seeder was second, and rope and hand hoe in ploughed plots was last.The ripper, direct seeder and jab planter had good germination. The ripper waseasiest to use. The direct seeder cost the most, but used the least labour. However,there was inadequate soil cover at planting, which favoured the jab planter over theripper. Farmers who owned oxen considered the jab planter a step backward. Poorfarmers without work animals liked the jab planter.Dry seeding and labour peaksIntroduced conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> technology greatly improved the timelinessof planting and weeding in the area. Before conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>, plantingfollowed ploughing, which began with the rains at the end of November and earlyDecember. It takes about 32 person-hours per hectare to plant seeds and placefertilizer. The ripper moved up planting from early December to November, beforethe rains. Idle time became productive and at the same time, the peak demand forlabour, for planting and weeding, is spread evenly. The rains come when the seedsare already in the soil. The ripper, which opens furrows without full cultivation, canget the whole farm planted before the rains and has good seed germination.However, dry planting carries risks. A light first rain, although it will not fullygerminate seeds will cause them to swell and rot, requiring replanting. Care isneeded to separate seeds from basal fertilizers, if they contain nitrogen or improperlydecomposed manure, yet not so far apart to hinder fertilizer use by roots. Contactof the two will scorch the seeds and they will germinate poorly.Soil coverIn the trial plots cover crops were sown in the maize after the first weeding. Maizeresidue provided soil cover. Individual farmers could choose a cover crop out ofDolichos lablab, mucuna, canavalia, Crotalaria orchroleuca, Lupinus albus (white lupin)and Vicia vilosa (hairy-pod vetch). White lupin and hairy-pod vetch were for thehigh-altitude Kisilo site (2100 m). Following the maize and cover crop seed harvest,the vegetation had to be protected from free-range livestock, seekers of cut-andcarryfeed for their livestock, and bush fires. Lablab, mucuna and vetch are verygood livestock feeds. Fences have been effective in Kisilo village, but not in Msheweand Wanging’ombe.Awareness campaigns on the detrimental effect of bush fires and the benefits ofsoil cover have started to bear fruit in some villages, such as Mayale. No livestockhave been allowed to graze on a 5-ha farmer field school plot for three years, inspite of the absence of fences. Bush fires have been curbed in a similar way. Villagebylaws that restrict bush fires and call for compensation or fines for crop damageare normally enforced. Interpretation of the bylaws is yet to be extended to defineresidues or soil cover as a ‘crop’. The bigger challenge is enforcing the bylaws whencattle herds are in transit and on the run.No external mulches were brought in from outside the field. Inedible cover crops,such as Canavalia ensiformis, have proved valuable during the dry season, especiallyin the drier Wanging’ombe Division. Live hedges of Tephrosia vogelii were preferredin Mshewe, but the shrubs failed to survive in Wanging’ombe.124 Mkomwa et al.
Farmers were advised to slash the crop residues using the slasher, machete or billhook(nyengo) one month before sowing. Cutting them earlier risks fast decomposition andestablishing weeds. Dry seeding is recommended, and when this is done, there areno weeds. However, when there is a delay and seeding has to be done when weedshave already germinated, it is recommended to kill them with glyphosate two to fivedays before planting.Crop rotationCrop rotation was not common in the study area, presumably from limitedknowledge and the extensive intercropping practised by farmers. However, a fewfarmers rotated maize intercropped with beans and with sunflower intercroppedwith cowpeas. Bambara nut was normally grown on the least fertile soil that couldno longer support the maize and sunflower rotations.Indigenous conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>Components of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> have been practised by farmers in thesouthern highlands of <strong>Tanzania</strong> for generations. Planting with minimal soildisturbance has been traditional practice in the drier areas of Iringa, Njombe,Mbeya and Chunya Districts, to save labour and enhance planting timeliness. Inthe traditional kukomolea and kuberega systems, a planting stick, dibbler, or a hand hoewould make planting holes in the unploughed soil at the onset of the rains. Handhoeing or animal-drawn weeding would follow, in addition to mixed cropping witha legume, such as beans, cowpea or lablab. After the grains were harvested, freerangegrazing livestock or bush fires would destroy the soil cover. The little cropresidue left would be collected and burned a short time before the rains. In thefollowing season, the system started over.Faidherbia albida, locally known as mpogoro, is an indigenous legume tree that growswell in Wanging’ombe. It is recognized for its soil-enriching properties when grownin the field with other crops. It sheds its leaves during the rainy season when cropsare in the field and grows new ones in the dry season. Farmers would maintainit if it reseeded in their fields, but they did not know how to raise the seedlings.Farmers learned how to scarify seeds to enhance germination along with nurserymanagement under the agroforestry component of the soil fertility initiative ofMAFS. Farmers are now raising their own Faidherbia albida seedlings and growingthem in their fields.Mulching and no-tilling in the coffee and banana farming system in the highrainfallRungwe District of Mbeya is the only successful indigenous conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> practice in the zone. Maize, beans, taro and horticultural crops areintercropped with coffee and bananas. Planting holes are made with the hand hoe,and the few weeds that emerge from the banana leaf and chopped old pseudostemsoil cover were hand pulled or cut with the hoe. Fertility is maintained by applyingkitchen refuse, mulch and manure. However, this farming system has not attractedresearch. Different interventions are presented in appendix 3.Mbeya District 125
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49:
Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51:
6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53:
villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55:
ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59:
Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61:
to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63:
Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65:
and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67:
Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69:
Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71:
Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73:
Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77:
10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79:
Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81:
Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83:
Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87:
TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89:
Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91:
crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93:
used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95:
Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97:
Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 151 and 152: technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154: In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156: Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158: Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160: • Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162: 10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164: 12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166: Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168: No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170: Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172: Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174: Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176: Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178: Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180: The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182: Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183: Transferring crop residue for lives