Erosion is now considered responsible for silting up both Lakes Eyasi and Manyarawith drastic impact on both terrestrial and aquatic organisms (COPEC 2003).Soil erosion and loss of fertility were identified as major environmental constraintsin both high and low altitudes of Karatu. On some occasions a lack of welldefinedland ownership caused farmers to hesitate to make long-term investmentsin measures to conserve the environment. In addition, continuous cultivation is akey element in degrading cropped fields resulting in compaction, nutrient mining,structural damage and erosion, as the soil surface is left bare (KDC 2001).Land pressure on the high-potential agricultural areas in the uplands eventuallyresulted in increased cultivation of marginal lands (COPEC 2003). Intensive croppingon hill slopes without appropriate soil conservation measures resulted in increased soilerosion and reduced soil moisture capacity, which in turn have led to low agriculturalproductivity. On-site effects of soil erosion include loss of fertile topsoil and largefluctuations in volume of rivers and springs, leaving behind deformed terrain.Degraded land stores less water, which again makes crops vulnerable to water stresseven in a minor drought. Less water stored in upper catchments has a serious negativeeffect on the smooth supply of water in Lakes Manyara and Eyasi (COPEC 2003).Offsite effects of soil erosion on the land catena (land top sequence along the slope)cause pollution of water bodies, sedimentation on the farmlands, and physicaldamage to crops and infrastructure. Currently, there is concern about increasedsedimentation in Lake Manyara, which has significantly reduced the lake’s volume.Sedimentation is caused by chemical pollution from farming activities at the uppercatchment areas. It promotes growth of weeds. Environmental degradation inLake Manyara National Park may affect wildlife. As this park is one of the mostpopular tourist sites in <strong>Tanzania</strong>, there is a real concern that sedimentation andits associated problems may negatively affect the area’s tourist industry and thelivelihoods of those who depend on it (COPEC 2003).Farmers still rely on extractive forms of land management, which lead to loss inorganic matter, nutrient depletion and soil compaction (pers. comm., assistantDALDO, Karatu). Intensive and regular use of hand hoes for digging, and discand mouldboard ploughs for preparing land have created a hardpan layer. Thesehard soil layers hinder rainwater from percolating into the soil, hence less waterinfiltrates and runoff increases, resulting in surface erosion and gullies. Becausethe soil’s productive capacity has weakened over time as a result of low soil fertility,plough pans and droughts, crop yields have declined. Whereas farmers used to getan average of 15–20 bags 3 of maize per acre 4 , currently they are getting less than5 bags under the same land management (KDC 2001). The low yields have ledto severe food insecurity and poor livelihoods as farmers depended on the sale ofsurplus maize cash. In the past farmers responded to these low yields by opening newfields in more fertile areas but population increase has led to abandoning shiftingcultivation and adopting continuous cultivation (Meindertsman and Kessler 1997).In turn, this continuous cultivation led to nutrient mining and severe soil erosiondue to the depletion of soil organic matter and hardpan settings.3 1 bag of maize weighs 100 kg4 1 acre = 0.405 ha70 Ringo et al.
Lack of information and knowledge about existing technologies that can improveagricultural production and conserve the environment at the same time is an issue.There have been frequent droughts, which have affected crop production, particularlywhere land is degraded. Strong easterly to south-easterly winds near the end of the dryseason contribute significantly to erosion where soils are exposed, particularly thosewith very fine and light particles (Meindertsman and Kessler 1997; COPEC 2003).All the problems mentioned above call for comprehensive measures to tacklethem together—that is, environmental conservation integrated with agriculturaldevelopment will lead to sustainable husbandry practices.6 Institutional initiatives in soil and waterconservationKaratu District OfficeAchievements: The District Agriculture and Livestock Development Office(DALDO) some time ago put in place measures to conserve soil and water inselected areas of the Karatu highlands. Under the Department of Land Use andAgromechanization, DALDO has coordinated numerous activities such as treeplantingprogrammes, agroforestry (improved fallowing, trees around homesteadsand along boundaries and contours) and organic farming (URT 2004b). Underthe <strong>Conservation</strong> Tillage Project (CTP), which was a pilot project under theNational Livestock Extension Project, NALEP, the following activities were carriedout: promotion of a technical package for obligatory construction of contours,draught-animal power ripping, use of farmyard manure, specific row spacing, useof chemical fertilizer and weeding. In 1996, SARI with the support of GTZ startedsubsoiling services under reduced tillage. Predominantly at ward level, extensionagents played an important advisory and technical supporting role in differentagricultural and conservation activities. They provided extension services andnecessary follow-up to promote use of fertilizers, improved seed, improved breedsof dairy cows, improved milk processing, and use of contours and trees, cover cropsand leguminous species. Farmers have continued to apply most of these practiceseven after the projects involved in their introduction ended.Gaps and challenges: Extension services at the district level have been limited fora number of reasons including inadequate and irregular government funds togetherwith unreliable transport. In addition, extensionists are generally poorly motivatedand often overwhelmed by their professional mandate. This is compounded by thedifficulty in accessing rough terrain over large operational areas (a ward may havemore than three villages and more than 1500 households).The agricultural district office had only one computer, which was stolen with allthe data; hence following up of some coordination issues and writing reports wasmade more difficult.Karatu District 71
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45: maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47: herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49: Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51: 6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53: villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55: ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63: Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148:
slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150:
Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152:
technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154:
In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156:
Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158:
Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives