abreast of information. Information and knowledge deficits have resulted in lessthan adequate support from agricultural extensionists. These deficits have beenfurther exacerbated by the knowledge-intensive nature of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>,that is, how to use specialized implements, how to approach farmers to changetheir mindset, how to convince them to switch from conventional farming practices,demonstrating how to manage soil cover, etc. In addition, the number of extensionstaff in the district is low; many must cover an entire ward rather than a village.Extensionists are adversely affected by few incentives, limited working facilities, anda hostile environment.Lack of implements in the district<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> implements are not readily available at the districtheadquarters, and some are too expensive for farmers to buy. Local artisans arenot trained in how to make the required conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> implements. Agood number of people who practise crop rotation of wheat, maize and beans haverealized that they don’t have direct seed implements for wheat; hence they havedecided to plough under, and no longer practise conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>.Inadequate policy analysis and advocacy of related issuesFew attempts have been made to analyse the policy environment of conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> or to advocate conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> technologies in national policyprocesses regarding <strong>agriculture</strong> and natural resource management. The districtdoes not have an agricultural resource centre dealing with conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>technologies, inputs and implements, and it is difficult to depend on servicesfrom afar. When inorganic fertilizers were being promoted, there was a nationalcampaign with the government subsidizing fertilizers. Concurrently technical,material, facilities and financial support were readily available from FAO/Global2000 to facilitate and build capacity at institutional and grassroots levels.Problems of attaining permanent soil cover and weed controlWeed management, especially in the initial stages of adoption of conservation<strong>agriculture</strong>, is a major problem. The main reason is that both cover crops andcrop residue have other immediate advantages to the farmers and their families.Availability of rainfall, management of the soil cover and time of planting thecover crop affects biomass production. However, farmers prefer the cover crop andsoil cover options compared with the use of herbicides—mainly as the cover cropsfertilize as well as cover the soil, and herbicides are designed only to kill weeds(Bishop-Sombrook et al. 2004).Competition for livestock feeds and soil coverApproximately 90% of Karatu small-scale farmers practise mixed farming.Traditionally, crop leftovers are kept as dry season feed; it is almost impossible toleave crop residues as soil cover while animals are starving.92 Ringo et al.
Weak bylaw establishment and enforcementLand rights are weak and the poorest farmers reported that it is difficult for themto claim their land rights because the process is cumbersome and the outcomeuncertain. Enforcement of existing bylaws is weak; bylaws proposed by thecommunity are long delayed before getting district approval.Limited access to cover crop planting materialsMany seed stockists sell seeds, mainly of maize, horticultural crops and sunflowers—but not cover crops. This is where the facilitating role of SARI comes strongly intoplay. The role could go as far as supporting new stockists with the supply of covercrop seeds in the villages where the demand is high.Low rainfallAs people are shifting from populated potential areas (highlands of Rhotia andMbulumbulu) to marginal lowlands, establishing cover crops becomes more difficultas with an average annual rainfall of 300 mm, the rains are inadequate.Limited knowledge in agronomic practices for different covercropsMany farmers (about 250) were ready to plant multipurpose crops that canalso provide food and cash. That means they need to abide by all agronomicalpractices—timely planting, use of certified seeds, proper spacing, weeding and pestcontrol, proper harvesting and storage. That trend of knowledge is lacking so thatfarmers growing lablab and pigeon pea have being complaining about poor yieldsdue to poor agronomical practices and postharvest loss due to poor storage.<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> technologies and practice require intensive knowledge andexperience, which at present is not available locally. A functioning local network ofconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> stakeholders in the district with good links to the centressuch as Arusha is essential to keep knowledge sharing going among farmers.12 ConclusionAs conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> is still in its initial stages in the district, no big impact hasyet been realized, although the future is bright. The technology has the potentialto release small-scale farmers in Karatu from food insecurity, environmentaldegradation and poverty, especially considering that they form 85% of thepopulation. With the current climatic change of inadequate rainfall and poordistribution, poor soil fertility, and shortage of labour due to AIDS and migrationof workers to the towns, conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> practices become a promisingcoping strategy for improving <strong>agriculture</strong> and rural livelihoods.However, the decision by households to invest in land for higher productivity isbased on many factors. Land tenure, size of farm holding, use of farm inputs,Karatu District 93
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49:
Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51:
6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53:
villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55:
ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59:
Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61:
to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63:
Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65:
and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144: egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150: Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152: technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154: In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156: Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158: Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160: • Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162: 10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164: 12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166: Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives