Land tenureSmall-scale farmers willing to practise conservation measures need entitlement toland for more than one season to see improved soil fertility.Few conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> implements<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> implements were not readily available. Most of the rippers wererecalled, leaving farmers with no choice but to revert to conventional tillage. The ripperswere too few. In some cases, they were shared among stakeholders and institutions.Lack of follow-up and coordination<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> initiatives lacked coordination on implementation,up-scaling, documentation and evaluation. After projects phased out, little wasdocumented on the results of using the technology.Inadequate conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> skillsGovernment extension staff serve vast areas, though they are expected to be in touchwith farmers regularly. They are hindered by lack of adequate facilities. At the sametime most are not aware of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>, leaving the responsibility to thefew with extensive knowledge. Yet they could greatly contribute in spreading andmonitoring conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> as a daily duty. <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> is a newtechnology and the knowledge needs to be widely spread to enhance its adoption.Bylaw enforcementGrazing bylaws were weakly enforced by local governments, leading to continuedsoil degradation, competition with livestock for crop residue and loss of soil cover.MigrationMigration out of the district to the newly established districts affected thedevelopment of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>. <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> knowledge wasnot widespread and few were aware of it.Adequate soil cover and weedingThe cover crops had many uses, so adequate soil cover was not attained. This wasexacerbated by drought, pests and diseases, and competition for livestock feed.Consequently, soil cover did not greatly reduce labour for weeding.Diversity of crops for researchMaize has been the main crop used for research. Other crops needing conservation<strong>agriculture</strong> intervention are irrigated horticultural crops, barley and wheat, especiallywith conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> implements, which are not available in <strong>Tanzania</strong>.38 Maguzu et al.
9 Conclusion<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> is a good way to farm, reduce soil erosion, and increasewater infiltration, soil organic matter and, ultimately, food security. It requiresradical change in farmer and extension staff attitudes. This requires patience andcombined effort from all stakeholders involved in conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>.Practical demonstration of success through good yield is essential to increaseadoption and improvement in the standard of living. When farmers who adoptedconservation <strong>agriculture</strong> build a new house or repair an old one, it captures theattention of neighbours, who may decide to adopt conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> togain the benefits. The efforts of the successful farmer are not acknowledged—butcopied secretly.Farmers have been able to select and use different aspects of conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>,enabling them to see it as friendly and adaptable. Some farmers started with onepractice—reduced tillage or rotation or intercropping cover crops with main crops—and ended with planting pure stands of lablab. In almost all cases, farmers started ona small portion of their land, then expanded it after every season.<strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong> practices in Arumeru District are still at an initial stage,especially for small-scale farmers. The practice started almost entirely throughSARI in Arumeru. Although the technology supporting its principles existed, SARIdid not sustain its effort by moving from demonstrations to farmer plots. Currently,SARI works with a wide network of community organizations, NGOs and privatebusinesses. Sustainable <strong>agriculture</strong> and soil conservation were disseminated mainlythrough farmer innovators, who were supposed to pass on the knowledge acquired,which often did not happen. The farmer innovators themselves can still beidentified through their practice and knowledge, but few have learned from them.However, diffusion through the farmer groups has taken place quickly. This has ledto spontaneous conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> adoption and upscaling in plots, villagesand institutions, mainly with rippers, jab planters and cover crops.A lot of soil erosion still needs to be addressed in the lowlands. Soil erosion wasreduced on trial plots with ripping and cover crops. Government agricultural officeswill have to actively advocate attaining the recommended minimum of 30% soilcover. It will reduce labour and increase some yields. <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>agriculture</strong>is an appropriate intervention for small-scale farmers burdened by disease, lowpurchasing power, low productivity, low soil fertility and food insecurity.10 Recommendations• Most conservation <strong>agriculture</strong> was tested under normal rainfed <strong>agriculture</strong>conditions. Since the rains are not dependable, conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>initiatives need to diversify to suit different situations, such as irrigation andvegetable farming. Crops used in trials should involve crops other than maize.• Herbicides should be used in a manner that the farmers can manage withthe aim of gradually moving away from them. Information on managingArumeru District 39
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14: February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17: Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18: Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27: Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29: 8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31: Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33: It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35: The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39: MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41: middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43: 4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45: maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47: herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49: Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51: 6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53: villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55: ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57: Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59: Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61: to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 64 and 65: and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69: Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71: Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73: Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77: 10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79: Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81: Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83: Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85: NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87: TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89: Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91: crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113:
study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115:
Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117:
abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119:
availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121:
package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123:
of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125:
Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127:
Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129:
Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132:
ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134:
AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136:
1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138:
3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141 and 142:
Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 143 and 144:
egin until the first rains. Maize y
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148:
slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150:
Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152:
technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154:
In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156:
Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158:
Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160:
• Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162:
10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164:
12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168:
No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172:
Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174:
Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176:
Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178:
Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180:
The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182:
Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183:
Transferring crop residue for lives