A background check for Mayale village revealed the area under crop cultivationbetween 1960 and 1980 tripled from increased use of oxen for farming. However,over the past 20 years, the area under cultivation has remained constant—probablyfrom increasing population density. Conversely, the production of maize andbambara nut has declined, while sorghum, finger millet and tobacco cultivationhas ceased. Sunflower, groundnut and cowpea production has gradually increasedover the years. Reasons for the increase are better market prices, low demandfor external inputs, mainly industrial fertilizers, and increased village sunflowerprocessing coupled with households using the oil and feeding the cake to livestock.Results of an absolute weighting exercise in Mapogoro village for men showed that85% of an average household’s cash income from the sale of crops, 10% from sellingchickens, goats and pigs, and the rest, 5%, from hiring out labour within the village.Cash income for women in Mapogoro village was 37% from cash crops, 20% fromsmall businesses, 19% from brewing, 13% from sale of small livestock, 6% from hiringout labour and 5% from savings within a group and received periodically (fig. 3).19% Local brewing5% Savings13% Small livestock37% Cash crops6% Sale of labour20% Petty businessFigure 3. Income sources for women in Mshewe.Average areas for each household for the different crops are maize 3 ha, sunflower1.2 ha, cowpea 1.4 ha and groundnut 0.4 ha. Draught animals are the main tillingpower source at 85% and hand hoeing is 15% for Wanging’ombe. In Mshewe,draught-animal power is 65%, hand cultivation 30% and tractor 5%. Area withmaize intercropped with beans is 35% and sunflower intercropped with cowpea is50%.Crop rotation is maize with groundnut or sunflower and back to maize. Beans are oftenintercropped with maize. The farming calendar starts in November and ends in June.Improved crop varieties are used by no more than 30% of the households and oxen areused to control weeds by less than 5% of the communities. Farmyard manure is greatlyvalued and used by the Wanging’ombe farmers; its use is lower in Mshewe.Drought in three out of five years, coupled with low fertility sandy soils andconsequent low crop yields were the reason for trying conservation <strong>agriculture</strong>technology and its adaptations. Timeliness of planting, so vital for better yields insemi-arid lands, could not be done with time-consuming ox ploughing. It could not118 Mkomwa et al.
egin until the first rains. Maize yield had dropped to less than 1 t/ha (Mkoga et al.2002; ARI 2004, and response to inorganic fertilizer on maize yield was low andunpredictable, partly from low soil moisture (Isaac Kimaro, village extension officerWanging’ombe Division 1998, pers. comm.).Because 85% of the land is cultivated by the ox plough, ox-drawn soil moistureconservation with reduced tillage and labour-saving rippers, ridgers and tie-ridgerswere introduced for evaluation. Legume cover crops and shrubs (mucuna, lablab,canavalia, tephrosia, pigeon pea and sesbania) were also introduced to improve soilfertility and retain soil moisture.LivestockThe principal livestock kept by farmers in both Wanging’ombe and Mshewe wardsare cattle, donkeys, goats, sheep, poultry and pigs. Cattle are the most importantand are owned by about 40% of households. They are used for power, manure,dowry, ceremonial rituals, meat and security during famine.Households that own cattle find it easier to invest in implements than do thosewithout. Owning cattle enables them to sell an animal to purchase an implement,such as a ripper, and to use draught-animal power. Within households, men decidewhen to dispose of livestock, except chickens. This gender imbalance hindersintroducing draught-animal power for tasks men do not do or do not understand,such as the drudgery in head porterage and hand hoe weeding. Consequently, oxcarts for domestic chores, a women’s task, or ox weeders for women crops, such asbeans and bambara nuts, receive the least investment.Crop and livestock interactionThe importance of cattle in the farming systems cannot be overemphasized.Manure from cattle is highly valued, although almost always applied without beingadequately composted. Oxen provide highly valued power for farm operations.Livestock is herded collectively. About 5–10 households from a single hamlet bringtheir cattle, sheep, goats and donkeys together and rotate the responsibility ofherding them—about two days in two weeks. Details of livestock and ownershipare given in table 3.Table 3. Livestock, livestock ownership and herd sizeLivestock Wanging’ombe Mshewe UsesOwnlivestock(%)Livestockunits(mean)Ownlivestock(%)Livestockunits(mean)Cattle 40 5 35 6 draught, manure, sale, meatGoats 3 4 5 6 sale, meat, manureSheep 1 4 2 4 sale, meat, manure, ritualsDonkeys 1 3 1 4 pack transportation, manurePigs 5 3 5 3 sale, meat, manureChickens 95 6 85 4 meat, eggs, sale, manureSource: Survey dataMbeya District 119
- Page 6:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 10:
Full conservation agriculture, howe
- Page 13 and 14:
February 2005, which made possible
- Page 16 and 17:
Table B. Key characteristics of cas
- Page 18:
Overemphasis on field-scale, techni
- Page 26 and 27:
Arumeru DistrictCatherine W. Maguzu
- Page 28 and 29:
8 Gaps and challenges .............
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive summaryA case study of co
- Page 32 and 33:
It has shown increase in yields, re
- Page 34 and 35:
The case study teamThe local team w
- Page 36 and 37:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 38 and 39:
MarketsThe urban centres are Kikati
- Page 40 and 41:
middle-aged, who migrate to towns t
- Page 42 and 43:
4 Conservation agriculture historyI
- Page 44 and 45:
maize, pigeon pea, and lablab seeds
- Page 46 and 47:
herbicide was completely abandoned
- Page 48 and 49:
Most of the implements, except the
- Page 50 and 51:
6 Adapting and diffusing conservati
- Page 52 and 53:
villages with eight farmers (Mwalle
- Page 54 and 55:
ecognition and enforcement of the b
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 3. Labour for conservation ag
- Page 58 and 59:
Timeliness in irrigating a farm is
- Page 60 and 61:
to rehabilitate his land by constru
- Page 62 and 63:
Land tenureSmall-scale farmers will
- Page 64 and 65:
and handling herbicides should be d
- Page 66 and 67:
Appendix 1Conservation agriculture
- Page 68 and 69:
Organization Activities Methods to
- Page 70 and 71:
Appendix 3Lablab and mucuna seed di
- Page 73:
Karatu DistrictDominick E. Ringo, C
- Page 76 and 77:
10 Benefi ts and effects of conserv
- Page 78 and 79:
Karatu acknowledgementsWe are very
- Page 80 and 81:
Forces driving for adoption of cons
- Page 82 and 83:
Despite the soundness of conservati
- Page 84 and 85:
NgorongoroKageraMaraMonduliArumeruM
- Page 86 and 87:
TemperatureTemperature decreases wi
- Page 88 and 89:
Most of the surface and underground
- Page 90 and 91:
crop does not store well. But when
- Page 92 and 93: used to attend to AIDS sufferers an
- Page 94 and 95: Erosion is now considered responsib
- Page 96 and 97: Traditional methods of soil conserv
- Page 98 and 99: Tanzania Association of ForestersAc
- Page 100 and 101: Tanganyika Farmers AssociationAchie
- Page 102 and 103: History of conservation agriculture
- Page 104 and 105: what is feasible is to intercrop, w
- Page 106 and 107: to connect experiences from differe
- Page 108 and 109: mainly cover crop practices were ad
- Page 110 and 111: Alfred’s neighbour Cornel has bee
- Page 112 and 113: study tours, organizing farmer fiel
- Page 114 and 115: Socio-economic and process aspectsW
- Page 116 and 117: abreast of information. Information
- Page 118 and 119: availability of agriculture credit,
- Page 120 and 121: package being introduced should con
- Page 122 and 123: of a planning workshop on conservat
- Page 124 and 125: Organiza tionRIDEP (1980-1984)Natio
- Page 126 and 127: Organiza tionMazingira BoraKaratu (
- Page 128 and 129: Appendix 3 Estates in Karatu Distri
- Page 131 and 132: ContentsAbbreviations .............
- Page 133 and 134: AbbreviationsARIAgricultural Resear
- Page 135 and 136: 1 IntroductionOver 80% of the peopl
- Page 137 and 138: 3 MethodMbeya was selected as a cas
- Page 139 and 140: Table 1. Agricultural characteristi
- Page 141: Three agricultural officers serve t
- Page 145 and 146: Table 4. Conservation agriculture r
- Page 147 and 148: slasher, machete and billhook (nyen
- Page 149 and 150: Farmers were advised to slash the c
- Page 151 and 152: technical support. Trial treatments
- Page 153 and 154: In the latest FARM Africa project,
- Page 155 and 156: Crop yieldsNineteen farmers in Wang
- Page 157 and 158: Changes in costs and incomeThe aver
- Page 159 and 160: • Farmers proposed that to improv
- Page 161 and 162: 10 Gaps and challengesDespite the s
- Page 163 and 164: 12 Recommendations• While some be
- Page 165 and 166: Appendix 1 Selected farmer profiles
- Page 167 and 168: No. Farmer name M/F Age(yrs)Fam ily
- Page 169 and 170: Appendix 3Intervention detailsIniti
- Page 171 and 172: Conservation agriculture technology
- Page 173 and 174: Land degradation due to soil erosio
- Page 175 and 176: Banana crop with mucuna as a cover
- Page 177 and 178: Types of soil cover: lablab plus ma
- Page 179 and 180: The pigeon pea crop has been left o
- Page 181 and 182: Demonstrating conservation agricult
- Page 183: Transferring crop residue for lives