11.07.2015 Views

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

94 Section 2: <strong>The</strong> neuropsychiatric evaluationA consultant recognized the patient’s acute condition as malignant catatonia/neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS). <strong>The</strong> patient had a grasp reflex,Gegenhalten (negativism), <strong>and</strong> could be postured. A lorazepam challengeconfirmed the diagnosis, temporarily relieving some <strong>of</strong> the rigidity, <strong>and</strong>permitting the patient to speak a few words. A course <strong>of</strong> bilateral ECT resolvedthe catatonia, although mild increased muscle tone <strong>and</strong> a mild resting tremorremained. <strong>The</strong> patient was able to dress, feed <strong>and</strong> care for herself. She couldconverse in a normal manner most <strong>of</strong> the time, <strong>and</strong> revealed that the “strangepeople” in her room were “little blue men” <strong>and</strong> that the food she saw on herbed was “bowls <strong>of</strong> fruit”. At times, however, she briefly failed to respond <strong>and</strong>walked about the inpatient unit touching ordinary objects as if she did notrecognize what they were.<strong>The</strong> consultant re-defined the clinical features: misidentification delusions(the neighbor), Lilliputian visual hallucinations (the little blue men), basalganglia motor signs, <strong>and</strong> a hypersensitivity to antipsychotics. Further questioningrevealed a history <strong>of</strong> several falls <strong>and</strong> a concern several years beforethat she might be developing Parkinson’s disease. A diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Lewy Bodydementia was made.Patients 4.1 <strong>and</strong> 4.2 had degenerative brain diseases for which there are nocurative treatments. Those processes would have progressed regardless <strong>of</strong> thediagnostic label. How did the more objective diagnosis help? For Patient 4.1, itled to a change in the attitudes <strong>of</strong> her treaters. When she was believed to have apsychogenic movement disorder, her physicians treated her as the perpetrator <strong>of</strong>her condition <strong>and</strong> with perfunctory respect. When she was seen as the victim <strong>of</strong> aterrible neurologic disease, their attitudes changed markedly <strong>and</strong> she was treatedmore kindly. Appropriate arrangements were made for her continued care.Patient 4.2 was being transferred for hospice care where death would likely haveoccurred within the next several weeks. Once recovered from her malignantcatatonia/NMS, 7 however, she was transferred to an assisted living programwhere she remained active <strong>and</strong> happy. Her condition stabilized for the nextseveral years <strong>and</strong> no further hospitalizations were needed.Precise terminologyInformation from the clinical evaluation needs to be organized into the medicalrecord <strong>and</strong> communicated to others. Vague or ambiguous statements are unhelpful.It is unacceptable to examine a patient’s heart <strong>and</strong> lungs <strong>and</strong> report “<strong>The</strong>heart beat wasn’t normal ...breath sounds were odd.” It is also unacceptableto describe patients with behavioral syndromes in vague or ambiguous terms.To describe the patient as “bizarre or confused, or as having incomprehensible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!