11.07.2015 Views

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

Descriptive Psychopathology: The Signs and Symptoms of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

31 Chapter 2: A history <strong>of</strong> psychiatric classificationrisk, introduced the concept <strong>of</strong> circular insanity (la folie circulaire) in 1854. JulesBaillarger, in a publication a few months later, used the term folie à double forme.<strong>The</strong>se “rare” conditions were conflated by Kraepelin into his manic-depressiveillness concept. 62 Baillarger also recognized the association between melancholia,stupor <strong>and</strong> what was to become known as catatonia.Classification <strong>of</strong> mental disorders, however, remained uncertain <strong>and</strong> differentsystems were espoused across Europe. Johann Christian Heinroth, a Germanpsychiatrist in the early nineteenth century, considered psychological <strong>and</strong> theologicalderangements to be fundamental to mental illness. Heinroth was more afundamentalist theologian than an objective clinician. 63 But there was no generalagreement on classification, with different versions (all elaborate) or schoolscentered about a prominent psychopathologist. <strong>The</strong> humoral theory, Galen’sideas about fever <strong>and</strong> pulse, <strong>and</strong> theological considerations continued to shapenosologies.<strong>The</strong> early “lumpers” <strong>and</strong> the unitary notion <strong>of</strong> insanityWilhelm Griesinger was influenced by the neurophysiologist Hermann Helmholtz.He considered psychiatry a natural science, not a philosophical or theologicaldiscipline <strong>and</strong> rejected Heinroth’s theological notions. He sought unity amongpsychiatric syndromes, viewing then as brain diseases. He wrote: “psychiatry<strong>and</strong> neurology are not merely two closely related fields; they are but one fieldin which one language is spoken <strong>and</strong> the same laws rule.” 64 Griesinger’s textbook<strong>of</strong> psychiatry inspired a generation <strong>of</strong> German neuro-psychiatrists. 65Griesinger took general paresis as a model <strong>of</strong> a single disease process expressedas several seemingly distinct syndromes. He applied this idea to the mentaldisorders. This unitary psychosis model (Einheitspsychose) came to dominateclassification. Syndromes were considered stages <strong>of</strong> a single disease rather th<strong>and</strong>ifferent patterns reflecting different diseases. <strong>The</strong> sufferer passed throughthe stages <strong>of</strong> melancholia, mania, <strong>and</strong> amentia (delirium), ending in dementia.Griesinger <strong>and</strong> his followers were not perturbed by the awareness that whilesome patients experienced different episode types, others with the same presumedunderlying illness experienced one or only a few types. An influencialcontemporary wrote: “<strong>The</strong>re is but one type <strong>of</strong> mental disturbance <strong>and</strong> we callit insanity.” 66Because the major syndromes were thought to reflect the same underlyingprocess, there was less need for classification <strong>and</strong> greater focus on etiology.<strong>The</strong> return <strong>of</strong> the splittersHenry Maudsley, a nineteenth-century British alienist, separated psychiatricsyndromes according to presumed faculties <strong>of</strong> the mind (emotion <strong>and</strong> intellect)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!