Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Draft 2012 Science Plan B. Integration and Theory. SCEC supports and coordinates interpretive and theoretical investigations on earthquake problems related to the Center’s mission. Proposals in this category should be for the integration of data or data products from Category A, or for general or theoretical studies. Proposals in Categories A and B should address one or more of the goals in Section VII, and may include a brief description (
B. Proposals may be strengthened by describing: 1. Collaboration • Within a disciplinary or focus group • Between disciplinary and/or focus groups • In modeling and/or data gathering activities • With engineers, government agencies, and others. (See Section XI) 2. Leveraging additional resources • From other agencies • From your institution • By expanding collaborations 3. Development and delivery of products • Community research tools, models, and databases • Collaborative research reports • Papers in research journals • End-user tools and products • Workshop proceedings and CDs • Fact sheets, maps, posters, public awareness brochures, etc. • Educational curricula, resources, tools, etc. 4. Educational opportunities • Graduate student research assistantships • Undergraduate summer and year-round internships (funded by the project) • K-12 educator and student activities • Presentations to schools near research locations • Participation in data collection Draft 2012 Science Plan C. All research proposals will be evaluated by the appropriate disciplinary committees and focus groups, the Science Planning Committee, and the Center Director. CEO proposals will be evaluated by the CEO Associate Director and the Center Director. D. The Science Planning Committee is chaired by the Deputy Director and comprises the chairs of the disciplinary committees, focus groups, and special projects. It is responsible for recommending a balanced science budget to the Center Director. E. Recommendations of the planning committees will be combined into an annual spending plan and forwarded to the SCEC Board of Directors for approval. F. Final selection of research projects will be made by the Center Director, in consultation with the Board of Directors. G. The review process should be completed and applicants notified by the end of February, 2012. VI. Coordination of Research between SCEC and USGS-EHRP Earthquake research in Southern California is supported both by SCEC and by the USGS Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (EHRP). EHRP's mission is to provide the scientific information and knowledge necessary to reduce deaths, injuries, and economic losses from earthquakes. Products of this program include timely notifications of earthquake locations, size, and 2011 SCEC Annual Meeting | 105
Page 1 and 2:
38˚ 36˚ 34˚ 32˚ 38˚ 36˚ 34˚
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Page 5 and 6:
SCEC Annual Meeting Program Sunday,
Page 7 and 8:
15:15 Introduction to the Automatic
Page 9 and 10:
Monday, September 12th 07:00 - 08:0
Page 11 and 12:
MONDAY | Meeting Program observatio
Page 13 and 14:
TUESDAY | Meeting Program evolution
Page 15 and 16:
TUESDAY | Meeting Program 17:20 Dra
Page 17 and 18:
WEDNESDAY | Meeting Program seismic
Page 19 and 20:
SCEC DIrector | Report reviews, bot
Page 21 and 22:
SCEC DIrector | Report The current
Page 23 and 24:
SCEC DIrector | Report meetings to
Page 25 and 26:
A Word of Thanks Figure 4. This "Br
Page 27 and 28:
SCEC Advisory Council | Report Afte
Page 29 and 30:
SCEC Advisory Council | Report and
Page 31 and 32:
SCEC Advisory Council | Report 3. C
Page 33 and 34:
Input and reaction to the SCEC4 Pro
Page 35 and 36:
SCEC Advisory Council | Report meet
Page 37 and 38:
Communication, Education, and Outre
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
SCEC Research Accomplishments | Rep
Page 47 and 48:
Lett., Seismological Society of Ame
Page 49 and 50:
Funning et al. resurveyed 19 GPS si
Page 51 and 52:
earthquakes. They find that plastic
Page 53 and 54:
Earthquake Geology SCEC Research Ac
Page 55 and 56:
SCEC researchers are also attemptin
Page 57 and 58: observed waveforms (after Olsen and
Page 59 and 60: SCEC Research Accomplishments | Rep
Page 61 and 62: urial depth, long-term tectonic str
Page 67 and 68: Figure 31. Image of the branching j
Page 73 and 74: Workshops SCEC Research Accomplishm
Page 77 and 78: Local-Scale Models CDM group resear
Page 81 and 82: Figure 54. CLM splitting from mantl
Page 83 and 84: Figure 59. The short-term rates aft
Page 87 and 88: esponse peaks to the incident groun
Page 91 and 92: Non-Linear Structural Simulations u
Page 99 and 100: References SCEC Research Accomplish
Page 105 and 106: Draft 2012 Science Plan SCEC Planni
Page 107: Draft 2012 Science Plan H. Award Pr
Page 111 and 112: Draft 2012 Science Plan 2a. Improve
Page 113 and 114: A. Seismology Draft 2012 Science Pl
Page 115 and 116: Draft 2012 Science Plan • Quantif
Page 117 and 118: IX. Interdisciplinary Focus Areas D
Page 119 and 120: Draft 2012 Science Plan E. Developm
Page 121 and 122: Draft 2012 Science Plan objectives
Page 123 and 124: Draft 2012 Science Plan relax segme
Page 125 and 126: D. National Partnerships through Ea
Page 127 and 128: A-024 VISUALIZING STRUCTURAL RESPON
Page 129 and 130: A-137 DISCOVERING THE GEOMORPHIC RE
Page 131 and 132: A-103 IMPACTS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC
Page 133 and 134: A-072 ANALYZING BUILDING RESPONSE T
Page 135 and 136: B-147 INCORPORATING GPS VELOCITIES
Page 137 and 138: INHIBITION OF VERY STRONG SHAKING,
Page 139 and 140: B-030 EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERING AND AFT
Page 141 and 142: B-127 SEISMOGRAM-BASED ASSESSMENT O
Page 143 and 144: Poster Abstracts New paleoseismolog
Page 145 and 146: Poster Abstracts ground motion depe
Page 147 and 148: Poster Abstracts this delay becomes
Page 149 and 150: Poster Abstracts time series analys
Page 151 and 152: Poster Abstracts of a ‘weight vec
Page 153 and 154: Perris2: .17, .16, .20, .23 Poster
Page 155 and 156: Poster Abstracts amplitude with the
Page 157 and 158: Poster Abstracts COMPARISON OF CO-L
Page 159 and 160:
Poster Abstracts found at other sta
Page 161 and 162:
Poster Abstracts This poster will p
Page 163 and 164:
Poster Abstracts Previous models of
Page 165 and 166:
Poster Abstracts of surface deforma
Page 167 and 168:
ADDITIONAL SHEAR RESISTANCE FROM FA
Page 169 and 170:
Poster Abstracts Seismic data were
Page 171 and 172:
Poster Abstracts providing omega-sq
Page 173 and 174:
Poster Abstracts understanding the
Page 175 and 176:
Poster Abstracts Although substanti
Page 177 and 178:
Poster Abstracts We will present th
Page 179 and 180:
E.H. Hearn, F.F. Pollitz, W.R. That
Page 181 and 182:
S. Hiemer, Q. Wang, D.D. Jackson, Y
Page 183 and 184:
Poster Abstracts STRONG GROUND MOTI
Page 185 and 186:
Poster Abstracts incorporated as ad
Page 187 and 188:
Poster Abstracts velocity model in
Page 189 and 190:
Poster Abstracts InSAR results base
Page 191 and 192:
Poster Abstracts We have observed h
Page 193 and 194:
Poster Abstracts near the rupture f
Page 195 and 196:
Poster Abstracts CRUSTAL STRUCTURE
Page 197 and 198:
Poster Abstracts volume from the RG
Page 199 and 200:
Poster Abstracts individuals (30%),
Page 201 and 202:
Poster Abstracts and Northridge Hil
Page 203 and 204:
Poster Abstracts In an emergent vie
Page 205 and 206:
Poster Abstracts analysis into a ge
Page 207 and 208:
Poster Abstracts silts and sands. T
Page 209 and 210:
Poster Abstracts Pegasus WMS provid
Page 211 and 212:
Poster Abstracts THE 2011 MW 9 TOHO
Page 213 and 214:
Poster Abstracts has proved to be a
Page 215 and 216:
Poster Abstracts Preliminary result
Page 217 and 218:
Poster Abstracts Comparison of this
Page 219 and 220:
Poster Abstracts DYNAMIC RUPTURE SI
Page 221 and 222:
Poster Abstracts between our two me
Page 223 and 224:
Poster Abstracts 3.0 sec). In the w
Page 225 and 226:
Poster Abstracts distance from past
Page 227 and 228:
Poster Abstracts colonies would be
Page 229 and 230:
Poster Abstracts SPACE GEODETIC INV
Page 231 and 232:
Poster Abstracts and 1857. Individu
Page 233 and 234:
ADVANCEMENTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISM
Page 235 and 236:
CONSTANT STRESS DROP FITS EARTHQUAK
Page 237 and 238:
Poster Abstracts 233 e 233 a 233 r
Page 239 and 240:
Poster Abstracts mainshock, but the
Page 241 and 242:
Poster Abstracts PLATE TECTONICS: A
Page 243 and 244:
Poster Abstracts THE MECHANICS OF E
Page 245 and 246:
Poster Abstracts 241 C 241 a 241 l
Page 247 and 248:
Poster Abstracts Geodetic and geolo
Page 249 and 250:
COMPARISONS AMONG EARTHQUAKE SIMULA
Page 251 and 252:
Poster Abstracts compaction of a di
Page 253 and 254:
Poster Abstracts installed and tele
Page 255 and 256:
Poster Abstracts are adopted for up
Page 257 and 258:
Poster Abstracts safety zones for t
Page 259 and 260:
Z. Xu and P. Chen Poster Abstracts
Page 261 and 262:
Poster Abstracts The Whittier fault
Page 263 and 264:
Poster Abstracts SAF have had a maj
Page 265 and 266:
Poster Abstracts ground motions whi
Page 267 and 268:
FREYMUELLER Jeffrey, U Alaska Fairb
Page 269 and 270:
RUIZ Ricardo, Chaffey HS RUNDLE Joh
show all

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?