24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />

Numerous research groups are exploring various topics through dynamic rupture modeling. Segall and Dunham continued<br />

their analysis of thermal pressurization, analyzing its effect through all phases of nucleation and into the early stage of<br />

dynamic rupture using rate and state friction with the aging form of the state evolution law on an infinitely thin fault. Their<br />

simulations begin using a quasi-static nucleation code and switch to an elastodynamic code just before seismic radiation<br />

becomes significant (Schmitt et al. 2011). When they compare purely quasi-dynamic simulations to those incorporating<br />

elastodynamics, they find that the slip distributions are the same, but rupture propagation is about 2.5 times faster in the<br />

quasi-dynamic case. Incorporating elastodynamics slows crack growth to the P-wave speed. For an infinitely thin slip surface,<br />

they find that thermal pressurization begins to dominate fault-weakening at 0.06 mm/s, and once a maximum velocity of 0.2<br />

mm/s is reached, thermal pressurization is the only important weakening term (Figure 26). Inconsistent with observations,<br />

incorporating thermal pressurization in the dynamic simulations results in a total loss of shear strength, an artifact that they<br />

attribute to the spatially uniform stress and shear resistance. They have begun to explore models with two types of<br />

Figure 25. Simulations of the normal stress changes and shear stress response in the experiments that are shown in Fig. 2 of <strong>SCEC</strong><br />

Report #10145. The left 4 panels are using the constitutive relations of Linker and Dieterich (1992), arranged in the same order as in<br />

Fig. 2. Right 4 panels are using the constitutive relations of Prakash (1998).<br />

60 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!