Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table of Contents D. Computational Science ................................................................................................................................. 111 IX. Interdisciplinary Focus Areas ........................................................................................................................... 113 A. Unified Structural Representation (USR) .................................................................................................... 113 B. Fault and Rupture Mechanics (FARM) ....................................................................................................... 113 C. Stress and Deformation Over Time (SDOT) ................................................................................................ 114 D. Earthquake Forecasting and Predictability (EFP) ........................................................................................ 115 E. Ground-Motion Prediction (GMP) ............................................................................................................... 115 F. Southern San Andreas Fault Evaluation (SoSAFE) ..................................................................................... 116 G. Earthquake Engineering Implementation Interface (EEII) ........................................................................... 117 X. Special Projects and Initiatives ........................................................................................................................... 118 A. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) ............................................................ 118 B. Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) ............................................................... 119 C. Community Modeling Environment (CME) ................................................................................................ 120 D. National Partnerships through EarthScope ................................................................................................. 121 XI. SCEC Communication, Education, and Outreach ......................................................................................... 121 CEO Focus Area Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 121 POSTER PRESENTATIONS: GROUP A ......................................................................................................................... 122 Communication, Education, Outreach (CEO) ...................................................................................................... 122 Community Modeling Environment (CME) ........................................................................................................ 123 Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) ......................................................................................................................... 123 Earthquake Geology / Southern San Andreas Fault Evaluaton (SoSAFE) ...................................................... 123 Fault Rupture and Mechanics (FARM) ................................................................................................................. 125 Tectonic Geodesy ...................................................................................................................................................... 127 Undergraduate Studies in Earthquake Information Technology (USEIT) ........................................................ 129 POSTER PRESENTATIONS: GROUP B ......................................................................................................................... 130 Crustal Deformation Modeling (CDM) ................................................................................................................. 130 Earthquake Forecasting & Predictability (EFP) .................................................................................................... 131 Ground Motion Prediction (GMP) ......................................................................................................................... 132 Lithospheric Architecture & Dynamics (LAD) .................................................................................................... 133 Seismic Hazard & Risk Analysis (SHRA) ............................................................................................................. 133 Seismology ................................................................................................................................................................. 134 Unified Structural Representation (USR) .............................................................................................................. 137 POSTER ABSTRACTS .................................................................................................................................................... 138 MEETING PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................................................................. 262 iv | Southern California Earthquake Center
SCEC Annual Meeting Program Sunday, September 11th 07:00 – 18:30 Registration Check-In (Hotel Lobby) 07:00 – 08:00 Breakfast (Poolside) 08:00 – 12:00 WORKSHOP: Source Inversion Validation Conveners: P. Martin Mai (KAUST), Morgan Page (USGS), and Danijel Schorlemmer (USC/GFZ) Location: Palm Canyon Room SUNDAY | Meeting Program The 2011 Source Inversion Validation (SIV) workshop will focus on the inversion results for the first test inversion problem, which is based on a dynamic rupture for an M ~6.6 strike-slip earthquake, embedded in a layered media. Synthetics at 40 sites are to be used for the inversion, forward-prediction from the obtained model at additional 16 sites are required to help assess the quality and robustness of the solution. Additionally, we will discuss the modelers experience with the SIV-wiki and the newly created benchmarking site in order to streamline the dissemination of future exercises (data and descriptions) and the upload and automated analysis and comparison capacities of the online toolbox. We hope that many source-modeling teams will present their results and experience with the SIV exercise. However, general contributions on recent developments for source-inversion strategies are welcome as well. We also encourage presentations on finite-fault source studies for recent well-recorded earthquakes that highlight the challenges in kinematic rupture inversions. 08:00 Introduction 08:10 Recent Developments in the SIV Portal and Its Benchmarking Tools (M. Mai, KAUST) 08:20 SIV Modeling Teams on Their Results for Exercise: in1_dip (15 minutes per group) 09:20 Discussion: SIV Portal, Exercise inv1_dip, Future SIV Exercises 10:00 Break 10:15 Source Studeis of the Sept 2010 M 7.1 and Feb M 6.3 Earthquakes in New Zealand (GNS Researchers) 10:45 High Frequency Aspects of Earthquake Rupture Imaged By Back-Projection of Seismic Array Data (J.-P. Ampuero, Caltech) 11:15 Discussion: Back-Projection Constraints for Finite-Fault Inversion, New Data for SIV Exercises 12:00 Adjourn 08:00 – 12:00 WORKSHOP: El Mayor-Cucapah Science and Earthquake Response Conveners: Mike Oskin (UC Davis), Sinan Akciz (UC Irvine), and Ramon Arrowsmith (ASU) Location: Horizon Ballroom More than a year has passed after the M7.2 El Mayor Cucupah earthquake. The event provided a view of a major earthquake in Southern California and opportunities for new discoveries in earthquake science and for reflection on future earthquake response activities. The event also engendered important cross border scientific collaborations. Our goals for this workshop are to review the recent research results as well as to take away lessons for the next major Southern California earthquake. Strict time constraints for the presentations will be enforced with 10 minutes on science and 3 minutes on lessons for response. Introduction 08:05 The 4 April 2010 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake source, from initial glimpse to synoptic overview (K. Hudnut, USGS) Seismology 08:20 The 4 April 2010 El Mayor - Seismological evidence and dynamic model of reverse rupture propagation during the 2010 M7.2 El Mayor Cucapah earthquake (L. Meng, Caltech) 08:35 Seismic field response to the El Mayor - Cucapah earthquake (E. Cochran, USGS) 2011 SCEC Annual Meeting | 1
Page 1 and 2: 38˚ 36˚ 34˚ 32˚ 38˚ 36˚ 34˚
Page 3: Table of Contents Table of Contents
Page 7 and 8: 15:15 Introduction to the Automatic
Page 9 and 10: Monday, September 12th 07:00 - 08:0
Page 11 and 12: MONDAY | Meeting Program observatio
Page 13 and 14: TUESDAY | Meeting Program evolution
Page 15 and 16: TUESDAY | Meeting Program 17:20 Dra
Page 17 and 18: WEDNESDAY | Meeting Program seismic
Page 19 and 20: SCEC DIrector | Report reviews, bot
Page 21 and 22: SCEC DIrector | Report The current
Page 23 and 24: SCEC DIrector | Report meetings to
Page 25 and 26: A Word of Thanks Figure 4. This "Br
Page 27 and 28: SCEC Advisory Council | Report Afte
Page 29 and 30: SCEC Advisory Council | Report and
Page 31 and 32: SCEC Advisory Council | Report 3. C
Page 33 and 34: Input and reaction to the SCEC4 Pro
Page 35 and 36: SCEC Advisory Council | Report meet
Page 37 and 38: Communication, Education, and Outre
Page 45 and 46: SCEC Research Accomplishments | Rep
Page 47 and 48: Lett., Seismological Society of Ame
Page 49 and 50: Funning et al. resurveyed 19 GPS si
Page 51 and 52: earthquakes. They find that plastic
Page 53 and 54: Earthquake Geology SCEC Research Ac
Page 55 and 56:
SCEC researchers are also attemptin
Page 57 and 58:
observed waveforms (after Olsen and
Page 59 and 60:
SCEC Research Accomplishments | Rep
Page 61 and 62:
urial depth, long-term tectonic str
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 31. Image of the branching j
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Workshops SCEC Research Accomplishm
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Local-Scale Models CDM group resear
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 54. CLM splitting from mantl
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 59. The short-term rates aft
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
esponse peaks to the incident groun
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Non-Linear Structural Simulations u
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
References SCEC Research Accomplish
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Draft 2012 Science Plan SCEC Planni
Page 107 and 108:
Draft 2012 Science Plan H. Award Pr
Page 109 and 110:
B. Proposals may be strengthened by
Page 111 and 112:
Draft 2012 Science Plan 2a. Improve
Page 113 and 114:
A. Seismology Draft 2012 Science Pl
Page 115 and 116:
Draft 2012 Science Plan • Quantif
Page 117 and 118:
IX. Interdisciplinary Focus Areas D
Page 119 and 120:
Draft 2012 Science Plan E. Developm
Page 121 and 122:
Draft 2012 Science Plan objectives
Page 123 and 124:
Draft 2012 Science Plan relax segme
Page 125 and 126:
D. National Partnerships through Ea
Page 127 and 128:
A-024 VISUALIZING STRUCTURAL RESPON
Page 129 and 130:
A-137 DISCOVERING THE GEOMORPHIC RE
Page 131 and 132:
A-103 IMPACTS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC
Page 133 and 134:
A-072 ANALYZING BUILDING RESPONSE T
Page 135 and 136:
B-147 INCORPORATING GPS VELOCITIES
Page 137 and 138:
INHIBITION OF VERY STRONG SHAKING,
Page 139 and 140:
B-030 EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERING AND AFT
Page 141 and 142:
B-127 SEISMOGRAM-BASED ASSESSMENT O
Page 143 and 144:
Poster Abstracts New paleoseismolog
Page 145 and 146:
Poster Abstracts ground motion depe
Page 147 and 148:
Poster Abstracts this delay becomes
Page 149 and 150:
Poster Abstracts time series analys
Page 151 and 152:
Poster Abstracts of a ‘weight vec
Page 153 and 154:
Perris2: .17, .16, .20, .23 Poster
Page 155 and 156:
Poster Abstracts amplitude with the
Page 157 and 158:
Poster Abstracts COMPARISON OF CO-L
Page 159 and 160:
Poster Abstracts found at other sta
Page 161 and 162:
Poster Abstracts This poster will p
Page 163 and 164:
Poster Abstracts Previous models of
Page 165 and 166:
Poster Abstracts of surface deforma
Page 167 and 168:
ADDITIONAL SHEAR RESISTANCE FROM FA
Page 169 and 170:
Poster Abstracts Seismic data were
Page 171 and 172:
Poster Abstracts providing omega-sq
Page 173 and 174:
Poster Abstracts understanding the
Page 175 and 176:
Poster Abstracts Although substanti
Page 177 and 178:
Poster Abstracts We will present th
Page 179 and 180:
E.H. Hearn, F.F. Pollitz, W.R. That
Page 181 and 182:
S. Hiemer, Q. Wang, D.D. Jackson, Y
Page 183 and 184:
Poster Abstracts STRONG GROUND MOTI
Page 185 and 186:
Poster Abstracts incorporated as ad
Page 187 and 188:
Poster Abstracts velocity model in
Page 189 and 190:
Poster Abstracts InSAR results base
Page 191 and 192:
Poster Abstracts We have observed h
Page 193 and 194:
Poster Abstracts near the rupture f
Page 195 and 196:
Poster Abstracts CRUSTAL STRUCTURE
Page 197 and 198:
Poster Abstracts volume from the RG
Page 199 and 200:
Poster Abstracts individuals (30%),
Page 201 and 202:
Poster Abstracts and Northridge Hil
Page 203 and 204:
Poster Abstracts In an emergent vie
Page 205 and 206:
Poster Abstracts analysis into a ge
Page 207 and 208:
Poster Abstracts silts and sands. T
Page 209 and 210:
Poster Abstracts Pegasus WMS provid
Page 211 and 212:
Poster Abstracts THE 2011 MW 9 TOHO
Page 213 and 214:
Poster Abstracts has proved to be a
Page 215 and 216:
Poster Abstracts Preliminary result
Page 217 and 218:
Poster Abstracts Comparison of this
Page 219 and 220:
Poster Abstracts DYNAMIC RUPTURE SI
Page 221 and 222:
Poster Abstracts between our two me
Page 223 and 224:
Poster Abstracts 3.0 sec). In the w
Page 225 and 226:
Poster Abstracts distance from past
Page 227 and 228:
Poster Abstracts colonies would be
Page 229 and 230:
Poster Abstracts SPACE GEODETIC INV
Page 231 and 232:
Poster Abstracts and 1857. Individu
Page 233 and 234:
ADVANCEMENTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISM
Page 235 and 236:
CONSTANT STRESS DROP FITS EARTHQUAK
Page 237 and 238:
Poster Abstracts 233 e 233 a 233 r
Page 239 and 240:
Poster Abstracts mainshock, but the
Page 241 and 242:
Poster Abstracts PLATE TECTONICS: A
Page 243 and 244:
Poster Abstracts THE MECHANICS OF E
Page 245 and 246:
Poster Abstracts 241 C 241 a 241 l
Page 247 and 248:
Poster Abstracts Geodetic and geolo
Page 249 and 250:
COMPARISONS AMONG EARTHQUAKE SIMULA
Page 251 and 252:
Poster Abstracts compaction of a di
Page 253 and 254:
Poster Abstracts installed and tele
Page 255 and 256:
Poster Abstracts are adopted for up
Page 257 and 258:
Poster Abstracts safety zones for t
Page 259 and 260:
Z. Xu and P. Chen Poster Abstracts
Page 261 and 262:
Poster Abstracts The Whittier fault
Page 263 and 264:
Poster Abstracts SAF have had a maj
Page 265 and 266:
Poster Abstracts ground motions whi
Page 267 and 268:
FREYMUELLER Jeffrey, U Alaska Fairb
Page 269 and 270:
RUIZ Ricardo, Chaffey HS RUNDLE Joh
show all

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?