Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Abstracts<br />
the experiment is for each model to generate a forecast that specifies the expected number of earthquakes for the next 24 hours<br />
in bins specified by ranges of latitude, longitude, and magnitude. The spatial cells are 0.1 degrees by 0.1 degrees, and the<br />
models target all earthquakes with magnitude greater than or equal to 3.95 in bins of 0.1 units. We examined the first three<br />
years of results; during this time, 270 target earthquakes occurred in the testing region, including a swarm in Baja California<br />
throughout February 2008 and the April 2010 M 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake.<br />
Through the testing component of this experiment, we discovered a flaw in the STEP implementation; it was corrected, and<br />
we evaluated forecasts based on the revised implementation. To evaluate the models, we conducted investigations of<br />
consistency (each model relative to the observation) and comparison (each model relative to the other). Based on joint loglikelihood<br />
measures, we found that both models are reasonably consistent with the observations of interest: the number of<br />
earthquakes, their spatial distribution, their magnitude distribution, and the joint distribution. To compare the models, we<br />
computed the rate-corrected average information gain per earthquake; this is the natural logarithm of the probability gain.<br />
STEP had an average information gain of 0.43 relative to ETAS; in other words, STEP had, on average, a 54% higher forecast<br />
rate than ETAS in bins where target earthquakes occurred, indicating that STEP was superior in this experiment.<br />
FOCAL MECHANISM WITH ERROR ESTIMATION USING REGIONAL WAVEFORMS: A CASE STUDY<br />
WITH THE 2008 CHINO HILLS EARTHQUAKE (B-072)<br />
Z. Zhan, S. Wei, and D. Helmberger<br />
Earthquake focal mechanisms are now routinely reported using regional records. However, due to difficulties in fitting<br />
seismograms with inadequate velocity model, and the usually non-linear inverse methodology, error estimation of focal<br />
mechanism is not a trivial problem. Here we explore the potential of using the bootstrapping method to estimate the error of<br />
focal mechanism from Cut-And-Paste (CAP). CAP first cuts the regional seismograms into Pnl wave and surface wave<br />
segments, then fits them allowing different time shifts, period bands and weights. CAP finds the best waveform-fitting focal<br />
mechanism by grid-searching the whole model space so we have the full information about each station's waveform misfit for<br />
every possible focal mechanism. This information naturally goes into the bootstrapping method. We validate this technique<br />
with the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake, which is well recorded and studied with the dense regional data from the TriNet. We<br />
also test the possibility to correct Amplitude Amplification Factors (AAFs) for each station using the information from the<br />
large number of bootstrapping solutions. Tests with both synthetic test and real data show largely reduced errors of focal<br />
mechanism parameters.<br />
STRAIN LOCALIZATION AND CRUSTAL THICKNESS VARIATION ACROSS MAJOR STRIKE SLIP<br />
FAULTS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REVEALED BY RECEIVER FUNCTION STUDIES (B-140)<br />
P. Zhang, M.S. Miller, J.F. Dolan, I.W. Bailey, and D.A. Okaya<br />
The degree to which faults are localized or distributed within the continental lithosphere has been a controversial subject for<br />
decades. Reflection and refraction studies indicate that the San Andreas fault (SAF) extends into the lower crust as a narrow<br />
fault zone in northern California and along the Mojave segment of the fault. However, the discretness of lithospheric<br />
deformation along the southernmost segments of the SAF system (e.g., the Elsinore, the San Jacinto and the Coachella segment<br />
of the San Andreas) remains unclear. We have begun a detailed study of how the distribution of strain at depth is in southern<br />
California using P receiver functions to image crustal and lithospheric thickness variations. We specifically focus on the<br />
depths of the Moho and lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) underneath the major faults. Our results for the geometry<br />
of crustal and lithospheric interfaces provide insight into the strain localization in this region. Our preliminary results using<br />
events recorded by Southern California Seismic Network and USarray reveal complex crustal and lithospheric structure in this<br />
region. A SW-NE profile across the Elsinore, San Jacinto, and and San Andreas faults indicates that the Moho dips to the<br />
southwest. Moreover, receiver gathers at certain stations near the faults show a strong back-azimuthal variation. Using simple<br />
velocity models to project the Ps conversions to depth, we find that some of the back-azimuth variation can be related to<br />
different sides of the faults. These back-azimuthal variations of the Moho signal indicate three-dimensional complexity<br />
beneath the central San Jacinto fault that may suggest strain localization at these depths.<br />
AWP-ODC-SGT: WAVE PROPAGATION AND DYNAMIC RUPTURE SIMULATION SOFTWARE WITH<br />
STRAIN GREEN’S TENSOR (SGT) CAPABILITIES FOR CYBERSHAKE 2.0 (A-031)<br />
J. Zhou, S. Callaghan, S. Song, P. Chen, K. Olsen, R. Graves, P. Small, P. Maechling, Y. Cui, and T. Jordan<br />
CyberShake (Graves, et al., 2008/2011) is a <strong>SCEC</strong> research project to develop a physics-based computational approach to<br />
create a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). CyberShake uses fully 3D wave propagation simulations to forecast<br />
260 | Southern California Earthquake Center