24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments | Report<br />

database searches and easier identification of fault components, alternative representations, and possible system-level<br />

associations of individual 3D fault elements that comprise CFM.<br />

Finally, we also completed a second version of the statewide Community Fault Model (SCFM 2.0), which includes updates in<br />

the southern California model along with more than 150 new fault representations in northern California (Figure 17). In<br />

conjunction with the California Geological Survey and USGS, the model inventory was expanded to include all of the priority<br />

faults defined by the Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF 3) working group. We are currently<br />

coordinating our formal evaluation of the SCFM with the UCERF 3 effort. This will involve a virtual workshop in which<br />

participants evaluate the SCFM 2.0 using the <strong>SCEC</strong> VDO visualization software and be asked to assess the accuracy and<br />

completeness of the representations. This<br />

will involve assigning a quality ranking<br />

to each fault representation based on<br />

criteria used to evaluate the <strong>SCEC</strong> CFM.<br />

These rankings, which largely reflect the<br />

amount of data available to directly<br />

constrain the interpretations, will be<br />

used to rank alternative fault<br />

representations, with the highest ranked<br />

alternative being used to compose the<br />

preferred (versioned) fault model.<br />

References<br />

Anderson, M. L., C. W. Roberts, and R. C.<br />

Jachens, 2000, Principal facts for<br />

Figure 17. Perspective view of the Statewide CFM (SCFM 2.0), which includes more than<br />

gravity stations in the vicinity of San<br />

300 fault representations. Earthquakes are shown from Shearer et al., (2005).<br />

Bernardino, southern California, U.S.<br />

Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 00-193, 32 pp.<br />

Chen, P., Lee, E., Jordan, T. H., Maechling, P. J., Denolle, M., & Beroza, G. C., 2011, Full-3D Waveform Tomography for<br />

Southern California, 2011 SSA <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong>, Memphis, TN.<br />

Chen, P., L. Zhao, Li, T. H. Jordan, 2007, Full 3D tomography for the crustal structure of the Los Angeles region, Bulletin of the<br />

Seismological Society of America, vol.97, no.4, pp.1094-1120.<br />

Graves, R., 2008, The Seismic Response of the San Bernardino Basin Region during the 2001 Big Bear Lake Earthquake,<br />

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 241–252.<br />

Komatitsch, D., Q. Liu, J. Tromp, P. Süss, C. Stidham, and J. H. Shaw, (2004), Simulations of strong ground motions in the Los<br />

Angeles basin based upon the spectral element method, BSSA, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 187–206.<br />

Lee, E., Chen, P., Jordan, T. H., Maechling, P. J., Denolle, M., & Beroza, G. C., 2010, Full-3D Waveform Tomography for<br />

Southern California, 2010 AGU Fall <strong>Meeting</strong>, San Francisco, CA.<br />

Magistrale, H., S. Day, R. W. Clayton, and R. Graves, 2001, The <strong>SCEC</strong> Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional<br />

Seismic Velocity Model Version 2: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 90, no. 6B, p. S65-S76.<br />

Mayhew, J.E., and K.B. Olsen (2009). Goodness-of-fit criteria for broadband synthetic seismograms, with application to the<br />

2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, earthquake, submitted to Seism. Res. Lett.<br />

Nicholson, C., A. Plesch, J.H. Shaw, 2011, CFM v.4.0: Continued upgrades and improvements to the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Fault<br />

Model and its associated databases, 2011 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong>, Palm Springs, CA.<br />

Olsen, K. B., and J. E. Mayhew (2010), Goodness-of-fit criteria for broadband synthetic seismograms, with application to the<br />

2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills, California, earthquake, Seis. Res. Lett., 81 (5), 715–718.<br />

Plesch, A., John H. Shaw, Christine Benson, William A. Bryant, Sara Carena, Michele Cooke, James Dolan, Gary Fuis, Eldon<br />

Gath, Lisa Grant, Egill Hauksson, Thomas Jordan, Marc Kamerling, Mark Legg, Scott Lindvall, Harold Magistrale, Craig<br />

Nicholson, Nathan Niemi, Michael Oskin, Sue Perry, Ge<strong>org</strong>e Planansky, Thomas Rockwell, Peter Shearer, Christopher<br />

Sorlien, M. Peter Süss, John Suppe, Jerry Treiman, and Robert Yeats, 2007, Community Fault Model (CFM) for Southern<br />

California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 97, no. 6.<br />

Plesch, A., C. tape, and J.H. Shaw, 2009, CVM-H 6.0: integration of adjoint-based tomography, the San Joaquin basin and other<br />

advances in the <strong>SCEC</strong> community velocity model, <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong>, Palm Springs, CA.<br />

2011 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!