Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />
medium (Harris and Day, 1993), they find that plastic yielding<br />
has little influence on compressional step-over ruptures, but<br />
significantly reduces the along strike overlap required for<br />
jumping and allows for a wider stepover region along<br />
dilatation stepovers (Figure 29). Time-dependent porepressure<br />
changes allow rupture jumping over wider<br />
compressional stepovers, but significantly reduce the ability<br />
Figure 28. Rupture contours every 0.5 s are mapped on the fault.<br />
for rupture jumping at dilatational stepovers. When<br />
considered together, time-dependent pore-pressure changes have the greatest effect on the resultant behavior (Figure 30).<br />
Several research groups examined rupture propagation along branching faults. Rice and colleagues address the physical and<br />
modeling issues associated with rupture propagation through branched triple junctions using 2D finite element methods<br />
(DeDontney et al., 2011). When a non-cohesive<br />
elastic-plastic material is employed, the elevated stresses around the rupture tip and at the branch junction promote material<br />
failure and inhibit opening, especially in the damage zones of mature faults (Figure 31). Opening may occur in intact<br />
crystalline rock and deformed zones that have experienced significant cementation (i.e., rocks having large cohesive strength),<br />
but is accompanied by significant material softening, decreasing the material strength with shear. Off-fault-plasticity also<br />
promotes rupture of extensional side branches and inhibits rupture on compressional side branches. Oglesby and Bowman<br />
continue to use the finite-element method to model the dynamics of branched faults, extending the work of King et al. (2005).<br />
Over the past year, <strong>SCEC</strong> intern Jennifer Tarnowski, investigated how the size and shape of the barrier on the vertical fault<br />
affected rupture propagation to the dipping fault. Her results suggest that the barrier on the vertical fault must be larger than<br />
some minimum area for the rupture to move to the dipping fault (Figure 32). To test the hypothesis that rupture propagation<br />
preferentially occurs in the direction of the more compliant side of a bi-material interface, producing greater damage on the<br />
stiffer side, and to understand the influence of material contrast on fault branching in 2D, DeDontney et al. (2011 in press;<br />
2011; 2011 submitted) examined the role of stress state on the distribution of plastic strain and the direction of rupture<br />
propagation. Their results suggest several factors contribute to determining rupture directivity and branch location. For plastic<br />
deformations, the most critical parameter is the orientation of the greatest compressive stress. DeDontney et al. demonstrate<br />
that plastic yielding is predicted in both the stiff and compliant sides, depending on the stress orientation, and rupture<br />
propagation can occur in the direction of slip displacement in the stiffer material if the most compressive stress is at a low<br />
angle to the master fault. Furthermore, fault branches are more<br />
likely to rupture when the branch is in the more compliant<br />
material, regardless of the stress state (Figure 33). Returning to<br />
the theme of planar faults and bimaterials (e.g., Andrews and<br />
Ben-Zion, 1997; Harris and Day, 1997), Rubin and Wang use<br />
observations to test the hypothesis that directivity is related to<br />
across-fault contrast in elastic properties. They (Wang and<br />
Rubin, 2011) performed inversions of spectral ratios of<br />
microearthquakes on the northern creeping section of the SAF<br />
to determine if SE propagation is favored. The spectral ratio<br />
data were fit with the moving point source model to give<br />
estimates of rupture lengths. The data suggest that of the 40% of<br />
earthquake events that can be classified as bilateral ruptures,<br />
the rupture length of the SE end is longer in ~67% of the cases,<br />
Figure 29. Effects of off-fault off- off fault plastic yielding on locations on fault 2 where<br />
and for rupture segments that can be defined as more nearly<br />
propagating ruptures on fault 1 (blue line) jump onto fault 2 through dilational or unilateral, more than ~75% propagate to the SE, and when<br />
compressional stepovers with different widths. Internal friction of 0.85 and defined, have approximately 10% faster propagation velocities.<br />
cohesion of 25 MPa are used to characterize off-fault rock strength in the models They conclude that the asymmetry in aftershock occurrence and<br />
with off-fault plastic deformation.<br />
SE directivity reflect the across-fault material contrast.<br />
Although the inversion results show that the directivity is<br />
somewhat broadly scattered, their analysis clearly demonstrates<br />
that several SE-propagating, strongly unilateral events do not<br />
have NW-propagating counterparts, regardless of the model<br />
62 | Southern California Earthquake Center<br />
Figure 30. Combined effects of off-fault plastic yielding and time-dependent<br />
pore-pressure on the ability of rupture jumping across a stepover.