24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />

medium (Harris and Day, 1993), they find that plastic yielding<br />

has little influence on compressional step-over ruptures, but<br />

significantly reduces the along strike overlap required for<br />

jumping and allows for a wider stepover region along<br />

dilatation stepovers (Figure 29). Time-dependent porepressure<br />

changes allow rupture jumping over wider<br />

compressional stepovers, but significantly reduce the ability<br />

Figure 28. Rupture contours every 0.5 s are mapped on the fault.<br />

for rupture jumping at dilatational stepovers. When<br />

considered together, time-dependent pore-pressure changes have the greatest effect on the resultant behavior (Figure 30).<br />

Several research groups examined rupture propagation along branching faults. Rice and colleagues address the physical and<br />

modeling issues associated with rupture propagation through branched triple junctions using 2D finite element methods<br />

(DeDontney et al., 2011). When a non-cohesive<br />

elastic-plastic material is employed, the elevated stresses around the rupture tip and at the branch junction promote material<br />

failure and inhibit opening, especially in the damage zones of mature faults (Figure 31). Opening may occur in intact<br />

crystalline rock and deformed zones that have experienced significant cementation (i.e., rocks having large cohesive strength),<br />

but is accompanied by significant material softening, decreasing the material strength with shear. Off-fault-plasticity also<br />

promotes rupture of extensional side branches and inhibits rupture on compressional side branches. Oglesby and Bowman<br />

continue to use the finite-element method to model the dynamics of branched faults, extending the work of King et al. (2005).<br />

Over the past year, <strong>SCEC</strong> intern Jennifer Tarnowski, investigated how the size and shape of the barrier on the vertical fault<br />

affected rupture propagation to the dipping fault. Her results suggest that the barrier on the vertical fault must be larger than<br />

some minimum area for the rupture to move to the dipping fault (Figure 32). To test the hypothesis that rupture propagation<br />

preferentially occurs in the direction of the more compliant side of a bi-material interface, producing greater damage on the<br />

stiffer side, and to understand the influence of material contrast on fault branching in 2D, DeDontney et al. (2011 in press;<br />

2011; 2011 submitted) examined the role of stress state on the distribution of plastic strain and the direction of rupture<br />

propagation. Their results suggest several factors contribute to determining rupture directivity and branch location. For plastic<br />

deformations, the most critical parameter is the orientation of the greatest compressive stress. DeDontney et al. demonstrate<br />

that plastic yielding is predicted in both the stiff and compliant sides, depending on the stress orientation, and rupture<br />

propagation can occur in the direction of slip displacement in the stiffer material if the most compressive stress is at a low<br />

angle to the master fault. Furthermore, fault branches are more<br />

likely to rupture when the branch is in the more compliant<br />

material, regardless of the stress state (Figure 33). Returning to<br />

the theme of planar faults and bimaterials (e.g., Andrews and<br />

Ben-Zion, 1997; Harris and Day, 1997), Rubin and Wang use<br />

observations to test the hypothesis that directivity is related to<br />

across-fault contrast in elastic properties. They (Wang and<br />

Rubin, 2011) performed inversions of spectral ratios of<br />

microearthquakes on the northern creeping section of the SAF<br />

to determine if SE propagation is favored. The spectral ratio<br />

data were fit with the moving point source model to give<br />

estimates of rupture lengths. The data suggest that of the 40% of<br />

earthquake events that can be classified as bilateral ruptures,<br />

the rupture length of the SE end is longer in ~67% of the cases,<br />

Figure 29. Effects of off-fault off- off fault plastic yielding on locations on fault 2 where<br />

and for rupture segments that can be defined as more nearly<br />

propagating ruptures on fault 1 (blue line) jump onto fault 2 through dilational or unilateral, more than ~75% propagate to the SE, and when<br />

compressional stepovers with different widths. Internal friction of 0.85 and defined, have approximately 10% faster propagation velocities.<br />

cohesion of 25 MPa are used to characterize off-fault rock strength in the models They conclude that the asymmetry in aftershock occurrence and<br />

with off-fault plastic deformation.<br />

SE directivity reflect the across-fault material contrast.<br />

Although the inversion results show that the directivity is<br />

somewhat broadly scattered, their analysis clearly demonstrates<br />

that several SE-propagating, strongly unilateral events do not<br />

have NW-propagating counterparts, regardless of the model<br />

62 | Southern California Earthquake Center<br />

Figure 30. Combined effects of off-fault plastic yielding and time-dependent<br />

pore-pressure on the ability of rupture jumping across a stepover.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!