24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts<br />

VISUALIZING COMPARATIVE HAZARD VULNERABILITY THROUGH GIS/SHAKEMAP INTEGRATION<br />

(A-157)<br />

S.C. Boss, F. Gutierrez, K.Y. Lin, T. Papikyan, and C.M. Valen<br />

The 2011 <strong>SCEC</strong> Undergraduate Studies in Earthquake Information Technology (USEIT) internship program challenged the<br />

Data Team to research information on specific earthquake sequences using global earthquake catalogs and incorporate the<br />

data into Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The internship focused on being able to integrate GIS into <strong>SCEC</strong>-Virtual<br />

Display of Objects (<strong>SCEC</strong>-VDO) software. The Data Team compiled information about six global earthquake sequences: the<br />

2010 Maule sequence in Chile, the 2010 Port-au-Prince sequence in Haiti, the 2011 Tohoku sequence in Japan, the 2010 El<br />

Mayor-Cucapah sequence in Mexico, the 2010 Canterbury sequence in New Zealand, and the 2004 Indonesian trench sequence<br />

in Sumatra. Information on population density, transportation routes, and infrastructure was located for each of the six<br />

countries and California. Data on hospitals, major airports, major roads, railways, and nuclear power plants was displayed<br />

onto maps in GIS. This information can be used to assess the hazards and the impact an earthquake could have on society. In<br />

addition, California data included locations of schools, fire stations, and police stations.<br />

The Data team also incorporated earthquake catalogs that were used to gather information on each sequence as well as focal<br />

mechanisms. Each earthquake sequence included the mainshock, aftershocks, and foreshocks. The global earthquake catalogs<br />

that were used included the National Earthquake Information Center Preliminary Determination of Epicenters (NEIC PDE)<br />

and the Global CMT (Global Centroid Moment Tensor). The Institute of Geologic and Nuclear Science (GNS) catalog was used<br />

to gather earthquake information in New Zealand. Research was also conducted on the ShakeMaps that <strong>SCEC</strong> created. All of<br />

the resulting information was then posted on the data team’s own website, which is <strong>org</strong>anized by corresponding countries.<br />

DO SMALL SURFACE STRAINS IN THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE REFLECT A PHYSICAL PROCESS?<br />

(B-152)<br />

O.S. Boyd, Y. Zeng, L. Ramirez-Guzman, and R. Smalley<br />

We reevaluate GPS data over the decade from 2000–2010 and model the resulting observations with local deformation<br />

mechanisms: viscoelastic relaxation subsequent to the 1811–1812 New Madrid, MO, earthquakes and slip across deeply buried<br />

finite dislocations to represent interseismic strain accumulation. The reevaluation of the GPS data accounts for outliers, offsets<br />

in the position time-series, and annual and bi-annual seasonal variations. Site velocities are found from the slope of the<br />

position time-series and are relative to a reference, which is the stack of all position time-series for a given component. We find<br />

that relative site velocities have a standard deviation of about 0.2 mm/yr with uncertainties on the order of 0.1 to 0.2 mm/yr<br />

or more. Uncertainty is difficult to estimate directly because the random walk component of noise, which contributes most to<br />

uncertainty in long geodetic time series, cannot be distinguished from the flicker and white noise components.<br />

Multiple models can account for some of the variance in the GPS data. A viscoelastic response of the crust from the 7 February<br />

1812 earthquake on the Reelfoot fault can account for 41% of the variance in the data. We perform an F-test and find that such<br />

a model has a 99% chance of being better able to match the data than does a null hypothesis. In this model, viscosity and slip<br />

are directly correlated such that increasing the viscosity by an order of magnitude requires an increase in slip by an order of<br />

magnitude to generate the same surface deformation. A viscoelastic response due to an earthquake on the Cottonwood Grove<br />

fault does not significantly improve our ability to model the data, but the lack of significance may be partly due to data<br />

limitations. Alternatively, a lower crustal right-lateral dislocation along the Cottonwood Grove fault slipping between 2 and 3<br />

mm/yr from 20 to 40 km depth can account for 25% of the variance and has a 70% chance of being better able to match the<br />

data than does a null hypothesis, while slip on a down-dip extension of the Reelfoot fault cannot significantly reduce the<br />

variance of the GPS data. These results suggest that having a good estimate of the subsurface rheology might allow for<br />

estimation of mean slip and magnitude of the 1811–1812 earthquakes as well as ongoing loading of the seismic zone.<br />

OPEN-SOURCE GROUND MOTION SELECTION USING THE GENERALIZED CONDITIONAL INTENSITY<br />

MEASURE (GCIM) APPROACH (B-013)<br />

B.A. Bradley<br />

The increasing use of time domain analysis is seismic assessment has resulted in a frequent requirement for site-specific<br />

ground motions. Many heuristic ground motion selection approaches have been proposed, and the use of a range of such<br />

methods has been shown to result a in large range of seismic performance statistics. A theoretically-founded ground motion<br />

selection methodology, based on the generalized conditional intensity measure (GCIM) approach, is presented. Both asrecorded<br />

and simulated ground motions can be selected using a semi-automated algorithm that requires only the specification<br />

146 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!