24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts<br />

understanding the physics of the subsidence process, the role of faults, the geohydrology of the local aquifers, and the<br />

mechanism of creep on the faults, as well as for decision-making for future investments in the Mexicali Valley.<br />

Before the earthquake, faults were slipping vertically few centimeters per year, a rate of about half the subsidence rate<br />

observed in the nearest subsidence bowl. Coseismic slip observed from the instruments and from manual measurements was<br />

of the order of centimeters, suggesting a strong consolidation effect triggered by seismic waves. One year after the earthquake,<br />

vertical slip observed on the Saltillo fault has been slower, while vertical slip on the Cerro Prieto fault ceased.<br />

A precision leveling survey in the Mexicali Valley had been done 2 months before the earthquake and was repeated two<br />

months after the earthquake. As expected for this earthquake, an uplift of about 30 cm towards the NE was observed along a<br />

38 km line in the SW-NE direction. Three subsidence bowls differ from this general pattern. While two bowls lay within the<br />

limits of subsidence area observed before the earthquake, the deepest one, with 36 cm relative depth, is situated to the<br />

southwest outside of the subsidence zone. All the subsidence bowls are probably associated with liquefaction observed in the<br />

area, with more liquefaction observed close to the epicenter.<br />

We checked the subsidence pattern after the earthquake using InSAR images. The small number of available images does not<br />

allow drawing definite conclusions, but suggests that the subsidence process continues at the previous rate.<br />

IDENTIFYING FAULT HETEROGENEITY THROUGH MAPPING SPATIAL ANOMALIES IN ACOUSTIC<br />

EMISSION STATISTICS (B-029)<br />

T.H. Goebel, T. Becker, D. Schorlemmer, S. Stanchits, C. Sammis, E. Rybacki, G. Dresen<br />

Frictional properties of fault surfaces fundamentally influence the local strength of the seismogenic crust. We investigate the<br />

relationship between fault asperities and the creation of micro-cracks and damage by analyzing acoustic emission (AE) events<br />

emitted during sliding of fractured Westerly granite surfaces in the laboratory. We developed a three stage procedure, for<br />

which rock samples are initially fractured under triaxial loading, followed by fault locking due to pressure increase and a final<br />

stage of fault reactivation. We observed three different types of behavior: (1) frictional sliding with decreasing differential<br />

stress (creeping fault) (2) linear and non linear stress increase, slow as well as abrupt stress drops (3) approximately linear<br />

stress increase followed by abrupt stress drop events between 10 to 300 MPa (stick slips with saw tooth pattern). We<br />

performed a detailed spatial analysis of event clusters before and after stick slips, primarily focusing on their b-values, seismic<br />

moment release and AE event densities. AE hypocenter distributions showed a high degree of spatial clustering close to low<br />

b-value regions. Slip events and the connected acoustic emission “aftershocks” nucleated within or at the periphery of areas of<br />

low b. To identify larger scale geometric asperities we combined fault structural information from post-experimental CT-scans<br />

with AE statistics. Asperities were connected seismically to low b-value regions, high moment release and increased AE event<br />

density and structurally to anomalous thin fault parts and point contacts of the host rock walls.<br />

The rough fracture surfaces during laboratory experiments, strongly favor the creation of spatial and temporal distinct AE<br />

clusters which have similar characteristics to seismicity observed on crustal scales. Specific crustal seismicity anomalies may<br />

be an expression of fault heterogeneity and mark areas of increased seismic hazard.<br />

CONNECTING THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS TO FAULT ROUGHNESS<br />

DURING STICK-SLIP EXPERIMENTS (B-036)<br />

T.H. Goebel, C. Sammis, and T. Becker<br />

Most continental earthquakes occur on or close to narrow fault zones within the seismogenic crust. Variations in size and<br />

spatial distribution of seismic events are likely influenced by differences in roughness and degree of heterogeneity of faults.<br />

The understanding of controlling factors of seismicity distributions around natural faults is limited due to largely unknown<br />

crustal stress, fault zone structure and roughness. Unlike field studies, high pressure laboratory stick-slip experiments enable<br />

the investigation of earthquake analog systems under controlled conditions. We connected spatial distributions of acoustic<br />

emissions (AEs) to post-experimental fault structure and slip surface roughness of previously faulted and saw-cut Westerly<br />

granite samples.<br />

To create stick-slip events we locked the specimen by increasing the confining pressure and resumed axial loading. Our<br />

experimental set-up enables the creation of a series of stick-slip events on a single fault plane. AEs were recorded and located<br />

with high speed and accuracy using 14 piezo-ceramic sensors attached directly to the rock sample. We analyzed the degree of<br />

localization of AEs with increasing stress level leading up to slip events. AE hypocenter distributions were quantified by<br />

computing the fractal dimension of spatial AE distributions and the activity fall-off with fault normal distance. Fault structure<br />

2011 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!