24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Abstracts<br />

Although substantial progress has been made in physics-based ground motion simulations in the recent years, the engineering<br />

community is still reluctant to use simulated time series for design. One of the reasons for this is a lack of understanding of<br />

how simulated ground motions compare to recorded ground motions, especially when it comes to their impact on structural<br />

response. There are on-going efforts of validation and verification of simulated ground motions, but these tend to be focused<br />

on record properties or on the response of single-degree-of-freedom systems. We are proposing a different approach: we plan<br />

to compare the nonlinear structural response of buildings subjected to recorded and simulated ground motions, given that<br />

both sets have similar spectral shapes.<br />

The responses of buildings to recorded motions have already been processed in a project recently completed by the PIs. The<br />

recorded set is representative of a magnitude 7 earthquake, rupturing within 20 km from a site with a Vs30 of 400 m/s<br />

(average shear wave velocity of the upper 30 meters of the soil column). We selected <strong>SCEC</strong> simulated records (for the same<br />

type of event and site conditions) with spectral shapes that were consistent with the recorded set previously used by the PIs.<br />

We then performed the structural simulations and compared the response results from both sets of time series (recorded and<br />

simulated). We present the summary of the approach used and the structural response results we have obtained for recorded<br />

and simulated ground motion records.<br />

DETECTION OF ANOMALOUS STRAIN TRANSIENTS USING PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND<br />

COVARIANCE DESCRIPTOR ANALYSIS METHODS (A-064)<br />

R.A. Granat, J.W. Parker, S. Kedar, and Y. Bock<br />

We have tested two classes of anomalous transient detectors that are completely independent of each other in origin, logic and<br />

implementation. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been successfully implemented in tectonic geodesy for regional<br />

filtering and common mode removal. Covariance Descriptor based detection methods are relatively recent technologies that<br />

have seen considerable success in the field of computer vision, and are predominantly used to detect statistically significant,<br />

spatially correlated anomalies in images. The two techniques examine the data in a fundamentally different and<br />

complementary way. The one (PCA) detecting common fundamental modes of ground motion across the array, and the other<br />

(CDA) detecting statistically significant common anomalies in a space-time “image” composed of deformation time series.<br />

The advantage of the PCA technique lies in its ability to resolve temporal transients that although common to a particular<br />

region, are not necessarily of the same amplitude across it. In addition, examination of higher residual modes highlights<br />

whether or not the transient has propagated across the network in time.<br />

Covariance descriptor methods are typically used in image analysis applications, where a set of filters is applied to an image,<br />

and the outputs of these filters form a feature vector for each pixel. The covariance matrices of the feature vectors for different<br />

image regions are calculated (these are termed the covariance descriptors for the regions), and then compared using a distance<br />

metric. The generalized covariance distance between regions that resemble one another (in the chosen feature space) will be<br />

small, while that between regions that are dissimilar will be relatively large. In this manner anomalies or matches between<br />

regions can be identified. This method can be readily extended to tectonic time series analysis, where the “image” regions are<br />

simply time windows, while the feature vectors are the tectonic displacement time series measurements themselves. The<br />

covariance descriptor of the time series as a whole is calculated and compared with covariance descriptors of localized time<br />

windows. Descriptors for localized windows that are far from the descriptor for the entire time series are likely anomalous.<br />

We present results from synthetic cases, where these methods were tested using an iterative approach, in which the output of<br />

one technique was used to fine-tune the input to the other.<br />

TESTING <strong>SCEC</strong> 3D SEISMIC VELOCITY MODELS IN THE SAN BERNARDINO AND LOS ANGELES BASIN<br />

REGIONS (B-018)<br />

R.W. Graves, A. Plesch, and J. Shaw<br />

The 2001 Mw 4.6 Big Bear Lake earthquake was recorded at over 180 broadband sites of the Southern California Seismic<br />

Network throughout the greater Los Angeles region of southern California. At periods longer than about 1 sec, the ground<br />

motions in the San Bernardino, San Gabriel and Los Angeles basins have significantly larger amplitudes and extended<br />

durations relative to sites outside the basins. To model the longer period (T > 1 sec) near-source motions, Graves (2008)<br />

developed a 3D representation of the basin structure in the San Bernardino region based on the potential field modeling of<br />

Anderson et al. (2000). This study extends the previous analysis by modeling the motions across the San Gabriel, Chino and<br />

Los Angeles basins using two Southern California Earthquake Center three-dimensional seismic velocity models (CVM-S4 and<br />

2011 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!