Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />
Another advance has been the application of multiple 10Be surface exposure dates to model the onset of fragility of<br />
precariously balanced rocks (Figure 14), recently published in Quaternary Geochronology (Balco et al., 2011).<br />
References<br />
Balco, G., Purvance, M., and Rood, D. (2011) Exposure dating of precariously balanced rocks, Quaternary Geochronology, v. 6,<br />
p. 295-303.<br />
Behr, W., Rood, D., Fletcher, K., Guzman, N., Finkel, R., Hanks, T., Hudnut, K., Kendrick, K., Platt, J., Sharp, W., Weldon, R.,<br />
and Yule, J. (2010) Uncertainties in slip-rate estimates for the Mission Creek strand of the southern San Andreas fault at<br />
Biskra Palms Oasis, southern California, Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 122, p. 1360-1377.<br />
Fletcher, K., Sharp, W., Kendrick, K., Behr, W., Hudnut, K., and Hanks, T. (2010) 230Th/U dating of a late Pleistocene alluvial<br />
fan along the southern San Andreas fault, Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 122, p. 1347-1359.<br />
Oskin, M., Arrowsmith, J., Hinojosa, A., Elliott, A., Fletcher, M., Fielding, E., Gold, P., Gonzalez, J, Hudnut, K., Liu-Zheng, J.,<br />
and Teran, O., (2010) Near-field deformation from the El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake quantified with airborne LiDAR,<br />
submitted to Nature Geoscience.<br />
Shelef, E., and Oskin, M., (2010) Deformation processes adjacent to active faults: Examples from Eastern California, Journal of<br />
Geophysical Research – Solid Earth, Vol. 115, B05308, 24 pp., doi:10.1029/2009JB006289.<br />
Disciplinary Activities<br />
Within the <strong>SCEC</strong> structure, the focus groups are responsible for coordinating interdisciplinary activities in six major areas of<br />
research: Unified Structural Representation, Fault and Rupture Mechanics, Crustal Deformation Modeling, Lithospheric Architecture<br />
and Dynamics, Earthquake Forecasting and Predictability, Ground Motion Prediction, and Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. The<br />
following sections summarize the year’s activities in each of these areas.<br />
Unified Structural Representation<br />
The Unified Structural Representation (USR) Focus Area develops models of crust and upper mantle structure in California<br />
for use in a wide range of <strong>SCEC</strong> science, including strong ground motion prediction, earthquake hazards assessment, and fault<br />
systems analysis. These efforts include the development of Community Velocity Models (CVM-S, CVM-SI, & CVM-H) and<br />
Community Fault Models (CFM, CFM-R, SCFM), which together comprise a USR. In partnership with other working groups<br />
in <strong>SCEC</strong>, the USR Focus Area also helps support the evaluation and improvement of these models through ground motions<br />
simulations, 3D waveform tomography, earthquake relocations, and fault systems modeling.<br />
1. This past year’s accomplishments include:<br />
2. Development of new versions of the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Velocity Model (CVM-H 11.2 and 11.9), which include new<br />
representations of the San Bernardino and offshore Santa Maria basins;<br />
3. Development of a new version of the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Velocity Model (CVM-SI), which includes perturbations to<br />
an existing model (CVM-S) as a result of iterative inversion simulations by Chen et al (2011) and Lee et al (2010). A<br />
similarly refined CVM-H model was released as versions 11.2 to 11.9, and is currently being updated.<br />
4. Support for the development of the statewide<br />
UCVM by the <strong>SCEC</strong> CME group, which includes<br />
these latest southern California model versions<br />
(CVM-S, CVM-SI, CVM-H) along with other<br />
alternative and complimentary regional velocity<br />
models in a common delivery platform.<br />
5. Implementation of a new CVM evaluation system by<br />
the <strong>SCEC</strong> CME that uses wave propagation<br />
simulations of moderate magnitude historical<br />
earthquakes and goodness-of-fit (GOF)<br />
measurements that compare simulated and<br />
52 | Southern California Earthquake Center<br />
Figure 15. Map of difference in Vs between CVM-SI i5-i0 and CVM-S<br />
4.0 at depth 0m (after Chen et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2010).