24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />

Another advance has been the application of multiple 10Be surface exposure dates to model the onset of fragility of<br />

precariously balanced rocks (Figure 14), recently published in Quaternary Geochronology (Balco et al., 2011).<br />

References<br />

Balco, G., Purvance, M., and Rood, D. (2011) Exposure dating of precariously balanced rocks, Quaternary Geochronology, v. 6,<br />

p. 295-303.<br />

Behr, W., Rood, D., Fletcher, K., Guzman, N., Finkel, R., Hanks, T., Hudnut, K., Kendrick, K., Platt, J., Sharp, W., Weldon, R.,<br />

and Yule, J. (2010) Uncertainties in slip-rate estimates for the Mission Creek strand of the southern San Andreas fault at<br />

Biskra Palms Oasis, southern California, Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 122, p. 1360-1377.<br />

Fletcher, K., Sharp, W., Kendrick, K., Behr, W., Hudnut, K., and Hanks, T. (2010) 230Th/U dating of a late Pleistocene alluvial<br />

fan along the southern San Andreas fault, Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 122, p. 1347-1359.<br />

Oskin, M., Arrowsmith, J., Hinojosa, A., Elliott, A., Fletcher, M., Fielding, E., Gold, P., Gonzalez, J, Hudnut, K., Liu-Zheng, J.,<br />

and Teran, O., (2010) Near-field deformation from the El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake quantified with airborne LiDAR,<br />

submitted to Nature Geoscience.<br />

Shelef, E., and Oskin, M., (2010) Deformation processes adjacent to active faults: Examples from Eastern California, Journal of<br />

Geophysical Research – Solid Earth, Vol. 115, B05308, 24 pp., doi:10.1029/2009JB006289.<br />

Disciplinary Activities<br />

Within the <strong>SCEC</strong> structure, the focus groups are responsible for coordinating interdisciplinary activities in six major areas of<br />

research: Unified Structural Representation, Fault and Rupture Mechanics, Crustal Deformation Modeling, Lithospheric Architecture<br />

and Dynamics, Earthquake Forecasting and Predictability, Ground Motion Prediction, and Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. The<br />

following sections summarize the year’s activities in each of these areas.<br />

Unified Structural Representation<br />

The Unified Structural Representation (USR) Focus Area develops models of crust and upper mantle structure in California<br />

for use in a wide range of <strong>SCEC</strong> science, including strong ground motion prediction, earthquake hazards assessment, and fault<br />

systems analysis. These efforts include the development of Community Velocity Models (CVM-S, CVM-SI, & CVM-H) and<br />

Community Fault Models (CFM, CFM-R, SCFM), which together comprise a USR. In partnership with other working groups<br />

in <strong>SCEC</strong>, the USR Focus Area also helps support the evaluation and improvement of these models through ground motions<br />

simulations, 3D waveform tomography, earthquake relocations, and fault systems modeling.<br />

1. This past year’s accomplishments include:<br />

2. Development of new versions of the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Velocity Model (CVM-H 11.2 and 11.9), which include new<br />

representations of the San Bernardino and offshore Santa Maria basins;<br />

3. Development of a new version of the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Velocity Model (CVM-SI), which includes perturbations to<br />

an existing model (CVM-S) as a result of iterative inversion simulations by Chen et al (2011) and Lee et al (2010). A<br />

similarly refined CVM-H model was released as versions 11.2 to 11.9, and is currently being updated.<br />

4. Support for the development of the statewide<br />

UCVM by the <strong>SCEC</strong> CME group, which includes<br />

these latest southern California model versions<br />

(CVM-S, CVM-SI, CVM-H) along with other<br />

alternative and complimentary regional velocity<br />

models in a common delivery platform.<br />

5. Implementation of a new CVM evaluation system by<br />

the <strong>SCEC</strong> CME that uses wave propagation<br />

simulations of moderate magnitude historical<br />

earthquakes and goodness-of-fit (GOF)<br />

measurements that compare simulated and<br />

52 | Southern California Earthquake Center<br />

Figure 15. Map of difference in Vs between CVM-SI i5-i0 and CVM-S<br />

4.0 at depth 0m (after Chen et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!