24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments | Report<br />

A “Workshop on Satellite Observations and Earthquake Predictability” was held in July 2011. This workshop brought together<br />

two separate communities that are active in attempting to understand how and whether it is possible to predict earthquakes.<br />

One is a group of space scientists involved in making satellite-based observations of anomalous electromagnetic and thermal<br />

signals that may be associated with earthquakes. The other consists of earthquake scientists involved in making seismological<br />

and geodetic observations, many of whom are involved with <strong>SCEC</strong>. These communities have had insufficient communication<br />

or collaboration, and bringing them together may<br />

help each understand better each other’s data and<br />

perspectives.<br />

References<br />

McGuire, J. J. (2008), Seismic Cycles and Earthquake<br />

Predictability on East Pacific Rise Transform<br />

Faults, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 98(3), 1067-1084, doi:<br />

10.1785/0120070154.<br />

Ground-Motion Prediction<br />

The primary goal of the Ground-Motion Prediction<br />

focus group is to develop and implement physicsbased<br />

simulation methodologies that can predict<br />

earthquake strong-motion waveforms over the<br />

frequency range 0-10 Hz. At frequencies less than 1<br />

Hz, the methodologies deterministically predict the<br />

amplitude, phase and waveform of earthquake<br />

ground motions using fully three-dimensional<br />

representations of Earth structure, as well as<br />

dynamic or dynamically compatible kinematic<br />

representations of fault rupture. At higher<br />

frequencies (1-10 Hz), the methodologies predict the<br />

main character of the amplitude, phase and<br />

waveform of the motions using a combination of<br />

deterministic and stochastic representations of fault<br />

rupture and wave propagation.<br />

Rupture characterization plays a vital role in<br />

ground-motion prediction and significant progress<br />

has been made in the development of more realistic<br />

implementations of dynamic and dynamically<br />

compatible kinematic representations of fault<br />

rupture within ground-motion simulations.<br />

Verification (comparison against theoretical<br />

predictions) and validation (comparison against<br />

observations) of the simulation methodologies<br />

continues to be an important component of this focus<br />

group with the goal being to develop robust and<br />

transparent simulation capabilities that incorporate<br />

consistent and accurate representations of the<br />

earthquake source and three-dimensional velocity<br />

structure. The products of the Ground-Motion<br />

Prediction group are designed to have direct<br />

application to seismic hazard analysis, both in terms<br />

of characterizing expected ground motions in future<br />

Figure 61. Examples of Green's functions derived from abient noise analysis<br />

(black) and synthetic ones from the <strong>SCEC</strong> CVM 4.0 (lower traces) and the<br />

model revised using full waveform tomography (CVM4SI2). The map shows<br />

the epicenter (start) and CMT solution (red beachball) of the Chino Hills<br />

earthquake and the inter-station paths (green lines) for the Green's functions.<br />

Figure 62. Three component (transverse: top, radial: middle, vertical:<br />

bottom) Green's functions for three paths within the waveguide (A-C) and<br />

one outside the waveguide (D). The Green's functions relatively impulsive<br />

for the path outside the waveguide, whereas the Green's functions contain<br />

long duration reverberations for paths within the waveguide, supporting its<br />

presence in the <strong>SCEC</strong> Community Velocity Model.<br />

2011 <strong>SCEC</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> | 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!