24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts<br />

The data employed so far involves several aftershock sequences on small and known fault segments. These constrains allow<br />

for better consideration of the path and site effects, including the path in the near vicinity of the source. Therefore, as opposed<br />

to most models (using either the epicentral distance for low magnitude events or the closest surface projection of the fault for<br />

stronger events) we consider the hypocentral source-receiver distance as controlling both the geometrical spreading and the<br />

inelastic path effects. This approach is not only more physical for M < 5 events, but also reveals the upper crustal<br />

heterogeneity (< 20km) in the San Jacinto Fault Zone area. The continuing work will focus on incorporating more data as it<br />

becomes available, and using the results to develop updated Ground Motion Prediction Equations. The results will be useful<br />

for earthquake engineering and for exploring the crustal heterogeneity around active faults.<br />

LOCAL AND REGIONAL SEISMIC RESPONSE TO INJECTION AND PRODUCTION AT THE SALTON SEA<br />

GEOTHERMAL FIELD, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (B-061)<br />

L.J. Lajoie and E.E. Brodsky<br />

California hosts both the largest geothermal resource capacity and highest seismicity rate in the nation. With plans to increase<br />

geothermal output, and proven earthquake triggering in the vicinity of geothermal power plants worldwide, it is important to<br />

determine the local and regional effects of geothermal power production. This study focuses on relating the volume of fluid<br />

extracted from and re-injected into wells at the Salton Sea geothermal field (SSGF) in Southern California to local seismicity<br />

rate and increased probability of larger events on nearby faults such as the San Andreas and Imperial faults. Seismic data is<br />

obtained from the publicly available Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) catalog and SSGF injection and production<br />

data from the State of California Department of Conservation. We identify triggered earthquakes in the catalog by modeling<br />

seismicity in a 15km radius around the SSGF according to an Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) method. The model<br />

seeks to fit the cumulative seismicity curve from our dataset by optimizing five seismic parameters in accordance with<br />

Gutenberg-Richter and Omori's law. The modeled curve is then removed from the dataset to isolate the non-ETAS, or<br />

production-triggered, signal. We then formulate a constitutive law to relate the seismicity rate to the driving stress (i.e.<br />

volumetric strain in the reservoir). Defining the local stressing rate provides a tool for predicting the effects that production<br />

has on regional seismicity rates.<br />

The largest spike in SSGF net production volume over the past 30 years is accompanied by the one of the largest increases in<br />

both seismicity rate and moment release within the geothermal field. This indicates a direct coupling between net fluid<br />

production volume (volume extracted minus volume re-injected) and seismicity rate and cumulative seismic moment in the<br />

field. Three dimensional plots of hypocentral earthquake locations show that seismicity is concentrated on an approximately<br />

NW-SE striking plane that dips shallowly to the west. Numerous inactive low angle normal faults with the same orientation<br />

have been mapped within and bounding the Salton Trough, suggesting the fault underlying the SSGF could be a reactivated<br />

detachment fault. Elevated seismicity rates on the detachment increases the probability of a larger earthquake on the fault that<br />

could directly trigger an event on the San Andreas fault.<br />

ELASTOSTATIC SOLUTIONS FOR REALISTIC SLIP AND STRESS AROUND MODE II AND III CRACKS (A-<br />

111)<br />

V.R. Lambert, S. Barbot, and J. Avouac<br />

A common practice for analyzing the displacement and stress caused by slip on buried faults is to discretize the fault area into<br />

finite size patches of assumed uniform slip and use the corresponding Green’s functions to predict strain at the surface or<br />

within the bulk of the medium. This formalism is commonly used to invert observation of co-seismic deformation for fault slip,<br />

in afterslip analyses, stress transfer studies and in numerical models of the seismic cycle, such as the Uniform California<br />

Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF). The discretization of the fault into areas of uniform slip introduces stress singularities<br />

at the edges of each patch, which might make the results quite sensitive to the choice of the discretization scheme. Yet, little<br />

attention has been paid to this issue so far. Here, we derive analytic expressions of the Green’s functions, for which the<br />

Okada’s solution is a special case. We derive a full-space formulation for linearly interpolated fault slip distributions, which<br />

allows discretization of any fault slip distributions without introducing stress singularities. We investigate the case of a finite<br />

crack with a uniform distribution of stress on the fault. We show that the Okada solution provides an inadequate<br />

representation of the stress distribution for mode II and III cracks, even in the limit of infinitely small discretization. We<br />

introduce a critical size of fault discretization below which stress singularities dominate and bias the distribution. Our<br />

tapered-slip solution does not suffer from these shortcomings, suppresses all singularities and converges to a uniform stress<br />

with smaller discretization. Our results demonstrate the need to resolve the areas of stress concentration in our models of fault<br />

slip evolution.<br />

190 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!