24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />

subjected to transient creep, asperity failure occurs, initiating tremor sequences. Parametric studies are underway to define the<br />

properties that control the propagation velocity and distance.<br />

Pollard and Madden investigated the effects of non-planar and non-vertical fault geometry on aftershock focal mechanisms<br />

and fault slip distributions for the 1992 Landers earthquake. They analyzed slip distributions compiled and digitized by the<br />

California Geological Survey (CGS) (Bryant, 1992, 1994, 2004; CGS, 2002), used the HASH (Hardebeck and Shearer, 2002)<br />

algorithm and aftershocks relocated by Zanzerkia (2003), and performed numerical modeling using the quasi-static, linear<br />

elastic, boundary element program Poly3D (Thomas, 1993; Maerten et al., 2005). Their 3D characterization suggests that the<br />

orientations of focal mechanisms may reflect the local<br />

stress field produced by slip during the main shock<br />

and are sensitive to fault geometry. They show that<br />

failure is predicted on non-planar faults having a<br />

wide range of orientations (Figure 22 and Figure 23),<br />

not all consistent with the orientation of and sense-ofslip<br />

on the mainshock faults if they were assumed to<br />

be vertical and planar. Also exploring aspects of fault<br />

complexity, Cooke performed claybox models to<br />

study fault formation and demise in restraining<br />

stepovers along strike-slip faults. Part of her efforts<br />

focused on characterizing the rheologic properties of<br />

wet kaolin (in collaboration with van der Elst and<br />

Brodsky) demonstrating that below the yield stress<br />

wet kaolin displays elastic-plastic behavior, and at<br />

failure exhibits velocity weakening rate-and-state<br />

behavior, thereby serving as a sufficient analog<br />

material for upper crustal deformation.<br />

Micromechanics and Constitutive Behavior<br />

Using micromechanical damage mechanics, Sammis et al. have extended their investigation of the effect of strain rate on the<br />

generation of off-fault damage in the process zone of faults. They demonstrate direct agreement with laboratory data on<br />

fracture strength as a function of slip rate from quasistatic to coseismic rates (Figure 24), and are working to extend their<br />

analysis to address the relation of off-fault damage to earthquake rupture mechanics specifically for the case of a large fault<br />

subjected to multiple earthquakes. Oglesby and Beeler are investigating the dependence of fault strength on rapid changes in<br />

normal stress and their implications for<br />

dynamic rupture in the laboratory by<br />

shearing bare granite surfaces at normal<br />

stress between 5 and 7 MPa. They find that<br />

the response of shear stress to changes in<br />

normal stress evolves with time or<br />

displacement, therefore more closely<br />

resembling the results of Prakash (1998)<br />

and that constitutive relationship of<br />

Prakash (1998) provides the best model of<br />

the results (Figure 25). Oglesby and Beeler<br />

interpret these results to reflect the<br />

enhanced resolution and digital recording<br />

capabilities that were not available at the<br />

time of the Linker and Dieterich (1992)<br />

study. Continuing their work investigating<br />

plastic deformation and strain localization<br />

and their implications for dynamic rupture,<br />

Carlson et al. are generalizing their STZ<br />

58 | Southern California Earthquake Center<br />

Figure 22. Preferred model geometry in (a) map view with icons showing<br />

the locations of the analyzed aftershocks, and (b) oblique view, looking<br />

northwest. Vertical bars indicate fault extents.<br />

Figure 23. Normalized preferred model slip distributions along the (a) Johnson<br />

Valley fault, JVF and (b) Homestead Valley fault, HVF. Horizontal bars below the slip<br />

distributions show the extents of faults, as in Figs. 1 and 2 of <strong>SCEC</strong> Report #10035.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!