Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
Annual Meeting - SCEC.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Report | <strong>SCEC</strong> Research Accomplishments<br />
subjected to transient creep, asperity failure occurs, initiating tremor sequences. Parametric studies are underway to define the<br />
properties that control the propagation velocity and distance.<br />
Pollard and Madden investigated the effects of non-planar and non-vertical fault geometry on aftershock focal mechanisms<br />
and fault slip distributions for the 1992 Landers earthquake. They analyzed slip distributions compiled and digitized by the<br />
California Geological Survey (CGS) (Bryant, 1992, 1994, 2004; CGS, 2002), used the HASH (Hardebeck and Shearer, 2002)<br />
algorithm and aftershocks relocated by Zanzerkia (2003), and performed numerical modeling using the quasi-static, linear<br />
elastic, boundary element program Poly3D (Thomas, 1993; Maerten et al., 2005). Their 3D characterization suggests that the<br />
orientations of focal mechanisms may reflect the local<br />
stress field produced by slip during the main shock<br />
and are sensitive to fault geometry. They show that<br />
failure is predicted on non-planar faults having a<br />
wide range of orientations (Figure 22 and Figure 23),<br />
not all consistent with the orientation of and sense-ofslip<br />
on the mainshock faults if they were assumed to<br />
be vertical and planar. Also exploring aspects of fault<br />
complexity, Cooke performed claybox models to<br />
study fault formation and demise in restraining<br />
stepovers along strike-slip faults. Part of her efforts<br />
focused on characterizing the rheologic properties of<br />
wet kaolin (in collaboration with van der Elst and<br />
Brodsky) demonstrating that below the yield stress<br />
wet kaolin displays elastic-plastic behavior, and at<br />
failure exhibits velocity weakening rate-and-state<br />
behavior, thereby serving as a sufficient analog<br />
material for upper crustal deformation.<br />
Micromechanics and Constitutive Behavior<br />
Using micromechanical damage mechanics, Sammis et al. have extended their investigation of the effect of strain rate on the<br />
generation of off-fault damage in the process zone of faults. They demonstrate direct agreement with laboratory data on<br />
fracture strength as a function of slip rate from quasistatic to coseismic rates (Figure 24), and are working to extend their<br />
analysis to address the relation of off-fault damage to earthquake rupture mechanics specifically for the case of a large fault<br />
subjected to multiple earthquakes. Oglesby and Beeler are investigating the dependence of fault strength on rapid changes in<br />
normal stress and their implications for<br />
dynamic rupture in the laboratory by<br />
shearing bare granite surfaces at normal<br />
stress between 5 and 7 MPa. They find that<br />
the response of shear stress to changes in<br />
normal stress evolves with time or<br />
displacement, therefore more closely<br />
resembling the results of Prakash (1998)<br />
and that constitutive relationship of<br />
Prakash (1998) provides the best model of<br />
the results (Figure 25). Oglesby and Beeler<br />
interpret these results to reflect the<br />
enhanced resolution and digital recording<br />
capabilities that were not available at the<br />
time of the Linker and Dieterich (1992)<br />
study. Continuing their work investigating<br />
plastic deformation and strain localization<br />
and their implications for dynamic rupture,<br />
Carlson et al. are generalizing their STZ<br />
58 | Southern California Earthquake Center<br />
Figure 22. Preferred model geometry in (a) map view with icons showing<br />
the locations of the analyzed aftershocks, and (b) oblique view, looking<br />
northwest. Vertical bars indicate fault extents.<br />
Figure 23. Normalized preferred model slip distributions along the (a) Johnson<br />
Valley fault, JVF and (b) Homestead Valley fault, HVF. Horizontal bars below the slip<br />
distributions show the extents of faults, as in Figs. 1 and 2 of <strong>SCEC</strong> Report #10035.