24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster Abstracts<br />

necks in the immediate area of the fumaroles. The Calipatria fault is subparallel to the San Andreas and Imperial faults and<br />

only one of many verified or suspected faults (including cross faults) in the complex tectonic setting of the Salton Trough.<br />

Mud from several volcanoes was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray<br />

spectroscopy (EDS). One sample contained boussingaultite, (NH4)2Mg(SO4)2·6(H2O), a rare mineral that is known to sublime<br />

under fumarolic conditions, possibly by ammoniation of hydrated MgSO4.<br />

As the Salton Sea level continues to drop, the third fumarole field is expected to surface in the next couple of years. It is also<br />

likely that as more land emerges, many of the CO2 gas seeps currently under water will begin to form mud volcanoes and<br />

mud pots, most of them along the same NW trending axis as the others. At about the same time a land bridge will form to<br />

Mullet Island, the first in about 60 years.<br />

IBEM3D: A REMOTE STRESS INVERSION PROGRAM HONORING MECHANICAL RELATIONSHIPS<br />

BETWEEN STRESS AND FAULT GEOMETRY (A-112)<br />

E.H. Madden, F. Maerten, and D.D. Pollard<br />

Aftershocks have been correlated spatially with changes to the Coulomb shear stress on optimally orientated planes (e.g. Stein<br />

and Lisowski, 1983; King et al, 1994) and static stress change on nodal planes inferred from focal mechanisms (e.g. Hardebeck<br />

et al, 1998; Seeber and Armbruster, 2000) due to slip on planar mainshock faults. The orientations of individual aftershocks<br />

have been mechanically related to the perturbed stress field from slip on non-planar faults, with distinct fault geometries<br />

producing the best-fit model Coulomb planes at aftershock hypocenters, as well as honoring the recorded slip distribution at<br />

Earth’s surface (Madden and Pollard, 2011, submitted). However, stress inversions generally overlook these connections<br />

between aftershocks, fault geometry and stress perturbations. New inversion software, iBem3D (Maerten, 2010), uses a<br />

homogeneous remote stress with one principal axis vertical to drive slip on non-planar faults and determines the resulting<br />

stress state at all aftershock locations. The orientation and remote principal stress magnitudes that minimize the ‘cost’ or misfit<br />

between aftershock focal mechanisms and model Coulomb plane orientations or slip vectors are converged upon iteratively,<br />

over multiple model runs. The cost of individual aftershocks may be analyzed for systematic effects on inversion results of<br />

aftershock characteristics such as magnitude, distance in time and space from the mainshock, and focal mechanism<br />

uncertainty, or to determine locations where mainshock fault geometry may be incorrect, producing a cluster of aftershocks<br />

with large misfits. The sum of all individual costs quantitatively assesses the relative performance of inversions executed with<br />

different model geometries or subsets of aftershocks. In addition, relative costs are used to select one nodal plane, from the<br />

two provided by the aftershock focal mechanism, for inclusion in the inversion. Other observed data, such as the orientations<br />

of slickenlines, veins, or secondary faults, may be used to constrain the inversion, either in addition to, or instead of,<br />

aftershock focal mechanisms; the only change to iBem3D procedure is adjustment of the cost function applied.<br />

COMPILATION OF SLIP IN LAST EARTHQUAKE DATA FOR HIGH-SLIP RATE FAULTS IN CALIFORNIA<br />

FOR INPUT INTO SLIP DEPENDENT RUPTURE FORECAST (A-129)<br />

C.L. Madden Madugo, J.R. Arrowsmith, D.E. Haddad, J.B. Salisbury, and R.J. Weldon<br />

Slip in the last earthquake along a fault, in conjunction with the application of appropriate recurrence models, can be used to<br />

estimate the timing and size of future ground-rupturing earthquakes. Surface slip measurements are relatively easy to acquire<br />

along highly active faults because offsets from the last event are often well preserved by geomorphic features in the landscape.<br />

We present a comprehensive database of slip measurements for high slip rate strike-slip and dip-slip faults in California for<br />

input into the slip-dependent 2011 Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF 3). Our database includes<br />

historic, paleoseismic, and geomorphic data on slip in the last event and multi-event offsets. Faults were prioritized by highest<br />

slip rates and longest time since the last event relative to average recurrence interval. Slip rate, timing of the last event, and<br />

recurrence interval were obtained from past reports by the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, unless<br />

more recently published data were available. A literature search determined the availability of offset data for the highest<br />

priority faults. We contacted authors of published slip studies to ascertain whether additional data exist in unpublished<br />

archives, gray literature, or publications in preparation. Lack of consistency in existing schemes to rate offset quality led us to<br />

develop a new semi-quantitative method to asses feature and tectonic quality for new and existing data. Recent analyses of<br />

newly available, high-resolution LiDAR topography for micro-geomorphic offsets have substantially increased the number of<br />

slip measurements available for our compilation. For faults with LiDAR coverage, but limited offset data, we identified<br />

reaches with high potential to preserve geomorphic offsets and calculated slip measurements. The methodology for our<br />

geomorphic analyses has been developed and implemented successfully in recent studies along the central San Jacinto Fault<br />

and 1857 earthquake reach of the San Andreas Fault. Last, we compiled data collected from our literature search and LiDAR<br />

200 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!