24.11.2012 Views

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

Annual Meeting - SCEC.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Abstracts<br />

COMPOUND EARTHQUAKES ON A BIMATERIAL INTERFACE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RUPTURE<br />

MECHANICS (B-040)<br />

E. Wang and A.M. Rubin<br />

Rubin and Ampuero [2007] simulated slip-weakening ruptures on a 2-D (line fault) bimaterial interface and observed<br />

differences in the timescales for the two edges to experience their peak stress after being slowed by barriers. The barrier on the<br />

"negative" side reached its peak stress when the P-wave stopping phase arrives from the opposite end, which takes ~20 ms for<br />

a 100 m event. This may be long enough for a potential secondary rupture to be observed as a distinct subevent. In contrast,<br />

the same timescale for a barrier at the "positive" front is nearly instantaneous, possibly making a secondary event there<br />

indistinguishable from the main rupture. Rubin and Gillard [2000] observed that 5 of a family of 72 similar earthquakes along<br />

the San Andreas fault in Northern California are compound and in all cases the second event was located on the negative<br />

(NW) side of the main event. Based on their simulations, Rubin and Ampuero interpreted this as being due to the abovementioned<br />

asymmetry in the dynamic stressing-rate history on the two sides of a rupture on a bimaterial interface.<br />

In this study, we search more systematically for secondary arrivals within 0.15 s of the first P arrival for microearthquakes on<br />

the San Andreas. Using an iterative deconvolution method described in Kikuchi & Kanamori [1982], we deconvolve the first<br />

0.64 s following the P arrival of a target event using a nearby Empirical Green's Function (EGF). When the EGF is a simple<br />

earthquake and the target is compound, the deconvolution result is expected to show two positive spikes, corresponding to<br />

the main and secondary events. A subevent is considered robust only when the difference between the waveforms of the<br />

target event and the aligned and scaled EGF is similar enough to the EGF at multiple stations. The azimuthal consistency of<br />

delays between the main and secondary arrivals is more convincing evidence that the target is a compound event.<br />

Using these criteria we temporarily identified ~70 compound events out of ~8300 in our catalog. Future work will include<br />

improving the quality of the inter-event delay time by using Monte Carlo simulations to allow the amplitudes and arrival<br />

times of both spikes (as opposed to just the second spike) to vary. Accurate relative locations and times can improve our<br />

understanding of the triggering mechanism of the subevents and perhaps the longer-timescale aftershock asymmetry<br />

observed in this region as well.<br />

AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF SHALLOW FAULT CREEP IN INSAR DATA (A-065)<br />

M. Wei, D. Sandwell, and J. McGuire<br />

Fault creep in Southern California mostly occurs at the shallow part of a fault with clear surface breakage. Monitoring and<br />

observing these shallow fault creep is important for regional seismic hazard assessment and improving our understanding of<br />

fault mechanics. Many fault creep occurred in remote area where no other observation instruments nearby. Even on faults<br />

with creepmeters, partial creep on sections that do not coincide with the creepmeter becomes undetectable. InSAR has been<br />

used to study fault creep in this region. However, as the volume of InSAR data has increased dramatically, over ~1000 scenes<br />

in California, and will continue to increase as future missions such as DESDynI start, searching for fault creep manually in<br />

InSAR data becomes time consuming and unrealistic. An automatic detector of fault creep in InSAR data is called for.<br />

Here, we developed an automatic detector using pattern recognition algorithm developed for road detection in SAR data to<br />

find shallow fault creep in InSAR data. The main workflow includes: process InSAR data, make gradient image of the phase<br />

image, detect linear features, and report possible fault creep. We tested this detector in Salton Trough with ERS, ENVISAT and<br />

ALOS data. Our method successfully detected most fault creep, mainly on the Superstition Hills Fault and San Andreas Fault.<br />

Limitations of the method include: prefer flat area with little sharp topography change; only be able to detect displacement<br />

larger than ~1 cm; can't detect deep fault creep. Nevertheless, this detector is a useful tool for monitoring shallow fault creep.<br />

REGIONAL BROADBAND WAVEFORM MODELING USING UPGOING AND DOWNGOING WAVE FIELDS<br />

(A-116)<br />

S. Wei and D. Helmberger<br />

3D crustal structure usually complicates the modeling of regional waveforms. The Cut and Paste (CAP) waveform inversion<br />

method, on the other hand, is much less sensitive to velocity models and lateral crustal variation, because it breaks the<br />

waveforms into Pnl and Surface waves and inverts them separately, allowing different time shifts to align the data and the<br />

synthetics for different portions of the waveform. These time shifts represent the difference between the 1D structure and the<br />

real earth. Similar idea is applied to the upgoing and downgoing wave fields, where we use different time adjustments for<br />

upgoing and downgoing waveforms to improve the broadband waveform fits. Furthermore, different source-time-functions<br />

250 | Southern California Earthquake Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!