11.07.2015 Views

Glenbrook Sation REF (pdf 3.15MB) - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

Glenbrook Sation REF (pdf 3.15MB) - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

Glenbrook Sation REF (pdf 3.15MB) - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX F CLAUSE 228 CHECKLISTReview of Environmental Factors<strong>Glenbrook</strong> commuter car park and interchange upgradeA checklist of factors that should be considered in the assessment of impacts prior to its determination isincluded within Clause 228 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. This clauseidentifies fifteen issues that need to be addressed. The following text provides summary details of each ofthe issues, the majority of which have been addressed within the body of this document.Factora. Any environmental impact on a community?During construction there would be a temporary increase in noise and vibration, dustand traffic disruptions.The Proposal would provide 56 car parking spaces <strong>for</strong> commuters, DDA parking andsafer pedestrian access to the station.b. Any trans<strong>for</strong>mation of a locality?The Proposal would potentially reduce the amount of on street parking by providingparking in the proposed commuter car park.c. Any environmental impact on the ecosystems of the locality?Some mature trees would be removed and some vegetation would be removed <strong>for</strong>the relocation of an 11kV power line. The mature trees are not hollow‐bearing andthe removal of the vegetation would not have a significant impact.Short‐term negativeLong‐term positivePotential long‐termpositiveMinornegativelong‐termd. Any reduction of the aesthetic, recreational, scientific or otherenvironmental quality or value of a locality?There would be no reduction of the aesthetic, recreational, scientific or otherenvironmental quality or value of a locality.e. Any effect on a locality, place or building having aesthetic, anthropological,archaeological, architectural, cultural, historical, scientific or social significance orother special value <strong>for</strong> present or future generations?The Proposal would be located in the curtilage of two locally significant heritageitems. Part of a goods siding that could be part of the Historic rail line would beremoved. The track to be removed would be photographically recorded and wouldnot result in any loss of archaeological, cultural or historical value.f. Any impact on the habitat of protected fauna (within the meaning of theNational Parks and Wildlife Act 1974)?There would be no impact on the habitat of protected fauna.g. Any endangering of any species of animal, plant or other <strong>for</strong>m of life,whether living on land, in water or in the air?There would be no endangering of any species of animal, plant or other <strong>for</strong>m of life,whether living on land, in water or in the air.h. Any long‐term effects on the environment?The Proposal would provide improved access to public transport.i. Any degradation of the quality of the environment?During construction there would be an increase in noise and vibration, dust and trafficdisruptions.NilLong‐term negativeNilNilNilShort‐term negative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!