A4 für Copyshop GB.indd - Bayerische Landesbank
A4 für Copyshop GB.indd - Bayerische Landesbank
A4 für Copyshop GB.indd - Bayerische Landesbank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
96 Report on the Bank and the Group<br />
} Return to satisfactory<br />
operating<br />
result after difficult<br />
years<br />
} Improved return<br />
on equity<br />
Key banking regulatory figures in accordance with the German Banking Act (KWG)*<br />
EUR billion<br />
BayernLB Group<br />
31.12.2004 31.12.2003<br />
Risk positions as per Principle I 127.7 137.2<br />
Own funds<br />
– of which core capital<br />
Own funds ratio (at Group level) 12.5 % 11.3 %<br />
Core capital ratio 8.3 % 7.8 %<br />
* Based on the approved accounts<br />
Earnings position<br />
Following three difficult years – measured in terms of operating profit – marked by the<br />
realignment of the credit and participations portfolios, the BayernLB Group once again<br />
succeeded in achieving a satisfactory performance in 2004. This was due not least to<br />
the Bank’s fundamental transformation of its business model.<br />
Factors contributing to this encouraging performance included dramatically decreased<br />
risk expenditure in credit business and, given the reduction of risk assets, consistently<br />
high revenues and low administrative expenses. As part of the Group’s strategic reori-<br />
entation, the participations portfolio was realigned and essential value adjustments<br />
16.0<br />
9.4<br />
carried out. Net income for the year was affected by an extraordinary expense of<br />
EUR 320 million. This amount represented a payment to the Free State of Bavaria upon<br />
conclusion of the EU state aid proceedings regarding housing construction funds.<br />
In 2004, return on equity was further enhanced both in the Group and at BayernLB.<br />
The Group’s return on equity was 9.5 percent (up from 4.9 percent in the previous<br />
year), while BayernLB’s was 8.0 percent (compared to 4.5 percent).<br />
15.5<br />
9.6