Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYbeen propagated for decades. Materialism (“wealth”), hedonism (“pleasure”),and emancipation from social bonds are “values” which are beingpursued. The statistical numbers of single households, divorces, andlack of children clearly indicate that nowadays young people are hardlycapable of forming lasting social bonds; that love and loyalty, responsibilityand altruism, that is: the will to make sacrifices for others, foremostand first of all for one’s own family, but also for kin, community,people, fatherland, and one’s own culture hardly exists. Among them,the love for children is the purest, deepest, most selfless and intensiveform of love or even form of emotion of our entire emotional world.The rejection of children therefore proves the inaptitude of an entiregeneration to love. The striking lack of these features, which lets thissociety collapse to such a degree that, if this development continuessteadily for another 100 years, there will be basically no German peopleleft, proves unshakably that these new generations are no longer sociallycompetent. And to go even further: the behavior of this generation isultimately destroying their society. I think that there can hardly be amore socially incompetent behavior than the one leading to the extinctionof a society itself. The question arises: What are the causes of thisdramatic change of behavior? We revisionists at least cannot be blamedfor this.If one is politically so inclined, one could give an answer to thisquestion as follows: It is obvious that a change of behavior affectingpeople from all walks of life at once can be caused only by correspondingdepictions in the mass media. The primary cause would then be thepropagation of hedonism, materialism, and egoistic self-realization aswell as the disparagement of traditional family values, among them father-and motherhood, animosity toward children, and abasement ofself-sacrificial engagement for a family and for the society at large. Theway the German law for the protection of the youth is currently written,such a way of arguing would permit the indexing of a major part of theGerman mass media, provided one has the political will.Please don’t misunderstand me. I am not in favor of such measuresat all, as I am opposed to censorship in general, but this example shows,what kind of arbitrary misuse your laws permit. As undefined as thissection of the law is, it is not only unlawful in my eyes but potentiallyvery dangerous.When revisionist media are indexed, the claim that they endangerthe social competence of adolescents is never substantiated. It is131