Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYsaid that it ought to be understood as a call for tolerance toward otherviews. But those adolescents did not listen anymore. No sooner had Iembarked on my way back to our car than these youngsters suddenlycame running after me yelling words like “Beat the Nazi!”Back then we had the two sons of said acquaintance with us, whowere of a similar age as those adolescents. The two boys were trulyshocked about such aggressiveness of the other youngsters. Withoutassistance from us they stated dryly that children and adolescents areeducated to hatred and intolerance in this museum – and very specificallyso against Germans in general and against historical dissidents on thistopic in particular.All three examples prove that the Holocaust propaganda permanentlygoing on in western countries – no matter whether based on truth orfalsehood – is nothing else but a gigantic incitement of the peoples ofthe world against the German people. This is even true for Germany,where the population’s mind is filled with hatred against everythingGerman; or in other words: in this country Germans’ minds are beingfilled with hatred against themselves.Hence, if you are searching for persons poisoning people’s mindsand for individuals and institutions traumatizing adolescents and pervertingthem into socially incompetent humans, maybe you should foronce look into the other direction. We revisionists do not traumatizeanybody with our media, and you cannot find any depictions of violenceor the glorification of it either.In the context of attempts by the German Assessment Agency to indexa revisionist book on the causes of World War II, the administrativecourt of Cologne has decided that such a censorship is unlawful. Shortlythereafter this verdict was confirmed by Germany’s Constitutional HighCourt with a decision from which I have quoted already early in connectionwith the definition of science. I may now quote from the decisionof the administrative court: 153“The Federal Assessment Agency ignores that it is exactly thepossibility of an open dispute between different opinions which supportsthe critical faculties of adolescents, which requires a free discussion.Apart from the conveyance of historical knowledge thisdownright requires the critical contention with deviating opinions.153 Administrative Court Cologne, confirmed by BVerfG, ref. 17 K 9534/94, re. Udo Walendy,Wahrheit für Deutschland, Verlag für Volkstum und Zeitgeschichtsforschung, Vlotho 1964;Engl.: Truth for Germany, ibid. 1981.134