Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYyet others are plausible, without giving comprehensible reasons, issimply shady.Next the Public Prosecution of Bochum states that, within the frameworkof article 130 German Penal Code, “the criterion of ‘trivialization’”requires“that it derives from the overall consideration of the pertinentstatement that the nature and extent of the genocidal acts perpetratedby the National Socialist regime against the Jewish people aresubject to a different historical assessment, for instance by representingthem as ‘police measures’ or as ‘inevitable acts of war’ (cf.Tröndle/Fischer, comments on German Penal Code, 50th ed., article130, no. 24). This cannot be ascertained regarding the essay ‘TheNumber of Victims of Auschwitz.’”But this cannot be ascertained for any of the writing I have authoredor published either.The Public Prosecution of Bochum finally asserted that Meyer hadstated himself “at the end of the text that his result does not relativizethe barbarity, yet verifies it.” In the quotes from my book Lectures referredto in chapter D.III.3. above, which the Public Prosecution ofMannheim has ignored, I have stated the following, which I have condensedhere:a) The persecutorial fate of the Jews and its illegal nature have to beand are recognized.b) This persecution was bad and barbaric.c) Already such measures of persecution not leading to death were unacceptable,and each victim is one too many.d) We owe compassion and respect to the victims.e) National Socialism is under any circumstances at least partiallyguilty for the fate of those incarcerated innocently, even if those incustody died due to “acts of God.” 180f) The mere deportation into camps with horrific hygienic and organizationalconditions resulting in the death of tens of thousandsRevisionism,” The Revisionist 2 (2), (2004), pp. 131-139; Gottfried Zarnow, “Kritik an FritjofMeyer durch einen Universitätslehrer,” Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung 8 (4)(2004) pp. 443f.180 Using the term “partially guilty” in my defense speech didn’t go down well with the publicprosecutor, because this allegedly constitutes trivialization. This was one of the reasons for theconfiscation of my defense speech; see Appendix 9, p. 363. According to this one has to holdNational Socialism 100% responsible for everything, if one does not want to be liable for prosecutionin Germany.163