Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYinvestigation five months later due to the same words, although now inwriting.This penal investigation was stayed in April 2008 as a result of mydefense lawyer’s negotiating skills, though. 172Hence, as a precautional measure I have severely expurgated thesubsequent chapters by merely addressing two exemplary quotationsinstanced by the prosecution. I have moreover rewritten the originalstatements in such a way that they do no longer contain any quotationsfrom my prohibited book, but only descriptions of the content. Furthermorethose passages in particular have been deleted which met withobvious disapproval of the prosecution and/or of the court.He who wants to read the exact quotes is free to read the indictment160 and to compare it with my book.* * *The prosecution’s quotations from the book Lectures on the Holocauston pages 13–16 of the indictment are either incomplete, selective,or have been ripped out of their context. By so doing the meaning ofsome of these quotes has been distorted. Other quotes obviously do notmeet any criteria required to render them prosecutable. In contrast tothis, such quotes which would refute the prosecution’s accusations havebeen totally omitted. Hence and in summary, the prosecution is guilty ofhaving committed distorting falsification. The following has to be remarkedabout the individual quotations as listed in the indictment: (Lectures= Lectures on the Holocaust)p. 13 Indictment, p. 17 Lectures:On page 15 to 17 of the Lectures an article in the German newspaperFrankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung (FAZ) is discussed which reportsabout a total of 26 million people who perished in the camps of theThird Reich as well as about shoes as traces of the crime. It is selfevidentand in need of no further proof that the death toll of 26 millionhawked around by the FAZ is excessively inflated. Furthermore thequestion of whether or not shoes as such are evidence for crimes is criticallydiscussed on those pages. This claim is corrected by an officialPolish-communist source which established as early as 1969 that theshoes found in the Majdanek camp did not belong to the victims of the172 Acc. to article 154, paragraph 1, German Penal Law (the expected punishment “does not carryweight” in comparison to the valid conviction); Staatsanwaltschaft Mannheim, ref. 503 Js22710/07, of 15 April 2008.155