Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYnewspaper to the skies between the lines or even expressly. His bookteems with pride about the “Corporate Identity” of his employer. Hemust have missed, though, that precisely his beloved FAZ has uncriticallyreproduced “this obviously false report,” that is to say the 26 millionlie.p. 13 indictment, p. 19 Lectures:This quotation deals with the origin of the figure of six million Jewishvictims. This quote by the prosecution is distorted in a particularlymalicious way by omitting the pivotal first half of the sentence withoutapparent reason except for the intention to deceive, for this half sentenceclarifies that the subsequent statement is based on nothing else butthe findings of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg (IMT)as recorded in its protocol. Besides, this also follows from the sourcesquoted in the book, which the prosecution has omitted as well. Althoughit is common practice to omit footnotes when quoting text, inorder to understand my statement about the six million figure it wouldhave been absolutely essential to know that it is based on sources, andnot just any sources. In the respective footnote I quote ten locations inthe IMT protocol which mention or deal with the six million figure. Byomitting the fact that my statement refers to the Nuremberg IMT and isproved by its protocol, the prosecution obfuscates that I am not theorigin of this statement but the IMT is, the quoting of which cannotpossibly by a prosecutable act.All further remarks about the quotations in the indictment unfortunatelyhave to be omitted here for legal reasons.3. Withheld StatementsIn contravention to her legal obligations the prosecution has deliberatelywithheld all statements in my book which would exonerate mefrom the accusations. This includes numerous locations where I recognizedthe persecutorial fate of the victims of the Third Reich, ascertainand condemn the illegal and barbaric nature of these measures, and categorizethe persecution of the Jews as genocide, as already mentioned:…[Most of the subsequently listed exonerating locations from my bookas quoted in my defense speech as well as their discussion must unfortunatelyalso be omitted here for legal reasons. Merely the page num-157