11.07.2015 Views

Resistance

Resistance

Resistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYBossi & ZiegertAttorneys Bossi & Ziegert · Sophienstr. 3 · 80333 MunichDefense Attorney MailMr.Germar Rudolf…Dear Mr. Rudolf,Attorneys at LawRolf BossiProf. Dr. Ulrich ZiegertMarkus SchwarzMaximilian Pauls…27 April 2007MP/uf/RudolfIt is my pleasure to comply with your wish and to subsequently explainonce more how the plea bargain with the court and the prosecutioncame about regarding the recent closure in mutual agreement of yourpenal proceedings:First it has to be affirmed that the main reason for the court’s and theprosecution’s preparedness for a dialog is to be seen in the precedingpenal trial against Ernst Zündel in front of a different penal chamber ofthe Mannheim District Court. As is generally known, a pure confrontationaldefense took place during the aforementioned Zündel trial especiallyby the lady lawyer Sylvia Stolz. As a result of this the proceedingswere dragged out to an extreme length due to a multitude of motionsto introduce evidence and to challenge the judges on grounds ofbias.The justified worry of the court and the prosecution resulting fromthis that such a protraction of the trial by your then lawyer Mrs. SylviaStolz could happen in your trial as well, was on the one hand a basicprerequisite for the preparedness of the court for a dialog and on theother hand a decisive trump card to achieve a bearable sentence for you.After the first talks of rapprochement had been conducted by me withthe associate lady judge of the 2nd Penal Chamber and the prosecutorand after I could glean from these talks that the court indeed had theworries described above about a protraction of the trial, I presented thefollowing suggestion to the court: The defendant Germar Rudolf willfrom now on file no more motions, in particular no motions to introduceevidence, will not make any statements in the matter anymoreand will cancel the appointment of Mrs. Sylvia Stolz as hislawyer with immediate effect. Hence the taking of evidence can beclosed and a verdict can be pronounced shortly. In turn I demand aprison term of two years.358

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!