11.07.2015 Views

Resistance

Resistance

Resistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYBy so doing the youth can conceivably be protected much more effectivelyfrom becoming susceptible to distorted historical presentationsthan by an indexing, which may even confer some justified attractionto such views, […] which the General Assessment Agencyhas not taken into consideration at all in their assessment.”Needless to say that this is true not just for books on the origins ofwars, but in principle for any topic, be they treated scientifically or not.He who prohibits always exposes himself to suspicions to have no argumentsanymore. I myself can therefore not get rid of the suspicionthat revisionists are censored only because their literature enables peopleto think again in a balanced and assessing way by neutralizing thetraumatization – that is, the brain washing or “social-ethical confusion,”as it used to be called in older version of the law for the protection ofthe youth, which is caused by established literature and by the massmedia.In any case, children and adolescents cannot even process my expertliterature intellectually. Censorship against these books is therefore notonly illegal but also ridiculous. The targeted group for this censorship istherefore not the adolescent as an individual requiring protection, butthe critical adult, that is, the populace at large.I have already pointed out the questionable and in my view clearlyunlawful practice of the Assessment Agency to no longer make the listsof indexed books generally accessible and to keep revisionist writingsin particular on secret lists. Add to this the fact that a few years ago thedeadline to file an objection against a decision to index a medium wasreduced to one week, which is a mockery especially for publishersabroad if considering their extended postal delivery times.In summary I have to conclude that the proceedings and the legal basisof the German Federal Assessment Agency cannot be brought intoalignment with the Kantian principle of a universal law, which is essentiallyalso the principle of the German Basic Law. Because an utterlyvaguely formulated law permitting everything to be banned which runsagainst the ideological grain of the current Powers That Be has to degenerateto despotism and is therefore unacceptable. In chapter D.V. Iwill elaborate in detail about the individual cases where I am accused ofhaving violated the law for the protection of the youth.135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!