Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYIt may well be true that evidence was destroyed – something thatMayer considers unnecessary to prove, but which is very necessary indeed!– but the reason why no evidence exists is irrelevant; non-existentevidence simply proves nothing.Example 2:The late Prof. Raul Hilberg, in his day the most worldwide acclaimedhistorian of the “Holocaust” – acclaimed by mainstream society,not by me! – has stated the following: 95“But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction [of theJews] not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency.There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructivemeasures. They [these measures] were taken step by step, one step ata time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, butan incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind reading by a farflung[German] bureaucracy.”Let me now place Hilberg’s thesis in the above used pattern:Thesis:A gigantic genocide took place.Demand: Verifiable proof.1st Support Thesis: No evidence has been created.Demand: How was it implemented? Explanation required.2nd Support Thesis: By mind reading.Since the second support thesis lies outside the realm of modern scientificresearch, Hilberg has logically “immunized” his theory againstrefutation.Example 3:Let us now look at the holes in the roof of Morgue no. 1 in CrematoryII of Auschwitz Birkenau. According to eyewitness testimony,Zyklon B granules were dropped into this morgue through holes in itsroof in order to commit mass gassings.Preliminary Theses: (based on testimony, in contradiction to evidence.)– Summer 1941: Auschwitz Concentration Camp receives orders formass exterminations.– Fall 1941: The first test gassing takes place.– Winter 1941: Implementation & start of mass exterminations.95Newsday, Long Island, New York, 23 Feb. 1983, p. II/3.73