Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY5. that the book proves the official depiction of the mass killings ofJews summarized under the term “Holocaust” to be inconclusive;6. that the author of the Lectures shows how the official version is fullof inconsistencies;7. that the witness statements upon which the historical Holocaustconcept rests have consistently been omitted from critical scrutinyby the proponents of the official version;8. that official historiography has neglected to elucidate and reflectupon the necessary technical conditions and processes of theclaimed mass killings, and to investigate the court testimonies ofwitnesses as well as the descriptions of experiences by contemporarywitnesses with regard to whether and, where applicable, towhat extent they are consistent with technical knowledge and insightsinto natural laws, or else have to be considered as refuted;9. that the deficiencies of official Holocaust historiography listed hereunder 6. to 8. prove it to be “unscientific” and “propagandistic”;10. that the objections of “revisionist” historiography against the official“Holocaust” version appear more than plausible and justify seriousdoubts about the historical concept protected by art. 130, para.3, German Penal Code;11. that the claimed planned and systematically implemented massmurder of Jews for racist motives has at no point in time been sufficientlyand competently researched by historians following thiscreed;12. that instead and right from the start the thesis of the physical exterminationof the Jews residing in the area of influence of theGerman Reich by the National Socialist government has been prescribedto historical research as a dogma and that attempts by historicalresearchers to oppose this were punished with massive defamations,destruction of the social existence as well as legal prosecutionsand were thus almost entirely suppressed;13. that a freely evolved consensus in the sense of a voluntarily recognizedundisputedness of the official historical concept of the Holocaustcannot be ascertained;14. that with the appearance of “revisionist” writings […] the officialHolocaust version is profoundly challenged in all its essentials aspects,so that the question arises whether the “revisionist” argumentscan be refuted by more thorough research activities orwhether the official concept of history has to be abandoned, so that246