Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY1. In a letter to Dr. Rolf Kosiek, Prof. Emil Schlee wrote: [289] “Alreadydecades ago […] I performed an assessment of the works by HerrRudolf in terms of correct scientific methods, […]. It is beyond disputethat Herr Rudolf meets the formal criteria. To insinuate anythingelse would be pure malice!” The witness will confirm thisstatement. (Letter of 27 July 2006)2. The witness will confirm that the following works meet the criteriaof scientific works: 290– Germar Rudolf, Vorlesungen über den Holocaust– Germar Rudolf, Das Rudolf Gutachten– Ernst Gauss, Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte– Herbert Verbeke, Auschwitz: Nackte Fakten– Wilhelm Stäglich, Der Auschwitz-Mythos– Jürgen Graf, Carlo Mattogno, Das Konzentrationslager Stutthof…– Jürgen Graf, Riese auf tönernen Füßen– Arthur R. Butz, Der Jahrhundertbetrug3. The witness will furthermore confirm that these works serve researchand science.Germar RudolfAnnex 18In the matter of Germar Rudolf I request to hear the expert witnessProf. Dr. Raul Hilberg, to be summoned via his address, for the followingprobative allegations:1. The witness stated the following, as quoted by the U.S. magazineVanity Fair (issue of June 1996) in the article “Hitler’s Ghost” byChristopher Hitchens: “If these people [revisionists, G.R.] want tospeak, let them. It only leads those of us who do research to reexaminewhat we might have considered as obvious. And that’s usefulfor us.”2. The witness will confirm that he is considered worldwide to be oneof the leading scientists on the so-called Holocaust.3. The witness will confirm that he considers the publications of therevisionist generally as useful, since they serve research and scienceby subjecting their results to tough attempts at refutation. This leadsto the exposure of weak points in the depictions of the Holocaust andthus to their qualitative improvement. Revisionist publications there-290 See notes 55, 47, 125, 85, 141, 181, 186, 191 for the English editions, in this order.242